Quickstart for your first Leapter blueprint:
docs.leapter.com/get-started/...
@leapter.bsky.social
AI-generated code is great. But only if we can trust it. At Leapter, we want to reinvent how software is delivered, from prompt to production. Read more about how we're approaching the problem on our blog: https://www.leapter.com/blog/
Quickstart for your first Leapter blueprint:
docs.leapter.com/get-started/...
Graphic titled “Deterministic tools for AI agents.” Steps include: identify a high value decision, define the spec, make logic visible, involve domain experts, version tools, build in Leapter, test with real data and edge cases, then export into n8n, MCP, API, or code.
Agents should orchestrate. Deterministic tools should decide.
We wrote up a practical workflow: generate a spec, review the logic visually, test boundary cases, then export into n8n, MCP, API, or code. 
www.leapter.com/post/determi...
Docs drop: start here if you want to build + verify a blueprint.
docs.leapter.com
A practical pattern: Langflow talks. Leapter computes the rules.
www.leapter.com/post/using-l...
Purple geometric background with a centered white quote: “For quick prototypes, speed can be enough. But when it comes to business-critical systems, speed without understanding isn’t an advantage; it’s a liability.” Leapter’s small white logo mark appears at the bottom center.
Speed is fine for prototypes.
In production, speed without understanding is a liability.
www.leapter.com/post/ai-help...
Why agents fail at logic (and what a deterministic tool changes).
www.leapter.com/post/why-age...
Leapter as a trust engine: rules live somewhere deterministic, not inside a model’s “best guess.”
www.leapter.com/post/introdu...
Purple-to-pink gradient graphic with the headline “Human-verifiable logic.” Three points define it: Visual (every branch and decision is exposed), Deterministic (no hidden guesses; same inputs, same output), and Executable (the blueprint is the code and the code is the blueprint; changes update the implementation). Leapter logo in the bottom-right with abstract geometric shapes on the right.
If vibe coding lets anyone generate code, the bottleneck is understanding it.
Human-verifiable logic = visual + deterministic + executable: inspect every branch, run test inputs, then publish it as a tool.
www.leapter.com/post/what-do...
The hardest part of building software is shared understanding.
Leapter’s pitch: make logic visible + verifiable.
www.leapter.com/post/what-is...
White background graphic with large black headline on the left: ‘Keeping humans in the loop.’ Below, two short paragraphs read: ‘We don’t need more black boxes that ship “something” and then ask engineers to clean up the consequences. We need a glass box: logic you can see, reason about, and agree on as a team.’ and ‘Keeping humans in the loop means AI can propose solutions, but humans can verify the rules. The output stays auditable, repeatable, and collaborative, not a magic trick you’re forced to trust.’ On the right side are stacked purple-to-pink gradient squares, plus a small pixel-like icon in the bottom right.
We don’t need more black boxes that ship “something” and then make engineers clean up the consequences.
Keeping humans in the loop means the logic stays visible and testable: inspect the rules, verify the behavior, ship with confidence.
www.leapter.com/post/mind-th...
Source (MIT Technology Review): www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/15/1...
05.01.2026 14:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Purple gradient graphic with translucent square blocks; centered white quote reads, “It has become obvious that LLMs are not the doorway to artificial general intelligence.” A small white pixel-style Leapter logo sits at the bottom center.
Welcome to 2026: the hype correction is a feature, not a bug.
LLMs generate code fast. But logic still has to be owned, inspected, tested, repeatable.
If an agent ships what you can’t verify, you didn’t gain speed. You moved the cost into review, incidents, rework.
Link in first comment. 🔗
McKinsey’s 1-year agentic AI takeaway: focus on workflows, not shiny agents. 
Our add: agents orchestrate, deterministic tools decide. If the rule matters, you should be able to inspect what ran. www.mckinsey.com/capabilities...
Agents should talk. Tools should decide.
We demoed @langflow.org + Leapter with a pizza-ordering agent: Langflow orchestrates, Leapter computes deterministic pricing via MCP.
🍕Playful example, production pattern.
www.leapter.com/post/using-l...
Agents aren’t failing because they can’t “reason.”
They fail because they can’t reason consistently—and deterministic logic doesn’t tolerate vibes. 
Why Agents Fail at Logic (and how to fix it):
www.leapter.com/post/why-age...
“You can’t trust what you didn’t validate. And you shouldn’t have to.”
AI-generated code can run and still be wrong. When logic is opaque, teams pay the review tax.
Leapter makes logic visible first — so humans can verify it before it becomes code.
www.leapter.com/post/mind-th...
Can you trust your AI agent with pricing, risk scores, or approvals?
In this new video, Marlene Schlegel shows how Leapter’s Logic Server gives agents deterministic tools they can call instead of guessing from a prompt.
🎥 www.youtube.com/watch?v=oggt...
Agents can’t “vibe” their way through pricing or risk rules.
In this video, Lena Hall uses Leapter + @n8n.io to keep logic visual, verifiable, and deterministic while the agent handles execution.
🎥 www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nLJ...
Most AI tools generate code. The real problem is agreeing on the logic before the code exists.
Leapter makes that logic visible so teams can trust what they ship.
McKinsey’s latest AI report makes a clear point: AI inaccuracy is already creating real problems for teams.
This is exactly why we built Leapter around visual, human-verifiable logic. If you can’t see the logic, you can’t trust it.
Report → archive.ph/aj7mb
People talk a lot about agent “intelligence," and not enough about agent consistency.
Leapter adds determinism with a human-verified logic layer.
Revisiting this post → www.leapter.com/post/introdu...
AI agents improvise. Your tools shouldn’t.
Here’s how to build deterministic, human-verified tools without writing code, test the logic visually, and export them straight into #n8n.
🎥 www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nLJ...
AI agents are multiplying, but reliability hasn’t caught up. They reason probabilistically, not deterministically.
Leapter adds the missing layer: human-verified logic agents execute rather than guess.
Why it matters → www.leapter.com/post/introdu...
Just a little glimpse of Leapter in London. 🇬🇧
Big ideas, small talk, and a question we keep coming back to:
What if we built a language both humans and AI could understand?
🎥 www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iuyq...
#ICYMI: Turning business intent into trusted software shouldn’t require a dozen handoffs.
Leapter makes logic visual, auditable, and human-verifiable so teams ship faster and smarter.
🔗 www.leapter.com/what-is-leap...
Software often breaks in translation.
The business explains. Product rewrites. Engineering interprets.
Leapter fixes the loop — turning business intent into visual, human-verifiable blueprints everyone can trust.
🔗 www.leapter.com/what-is-leap...
AI tools can write code—but can you trust it?
Speed means nothing if you can’t see the logic.
Leapter makes AI output visible, auditable, and human-verifiable—so teams move fast and trust what they ship.
www.leapter.com/mind-the-gap...
A close-up photo of a green frog perched on a leaf. The frog is looking directly at the camera, symbolizing a clear leap forward — used here as a visual metaphor for Leapter’s mission to bring clarity and trust into software development.
Big leaps in software come from clarity, not just code. 🐸
Leapter makes business logic visual & verifiable—so teams can trust what they ship.
The myth of AI code gen:
🚫 Hallucinations aren’t going away
🚫 “Faster” now means slower later in validation
At Leapter, trust comes first: visible, verifiable blueprints → production code.
🎥 Oliver Welte explains.
What if “human in the loop” meant the business user—not just the developer?
Leapter makes it possible for domain experts to validate system logic early. Trust, built in.