Dr. Media's Avatar

Dr. Media

@drmediaprof.bsky.social

Associate Professor at Western State. Likes movies, dogs, coffee, and hiking. Opinions mine but should be yours.

54 Followers  |  201 Following  |  31 Posts  |  Joined: 01.04.2025  |  1.7479

Latest posts by drmediaprof.bsky.social on Bluesky

This is more of a comment than a question, but the professor's CRT analysis is infuriating. #scms25

05.04.2025 23:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The ecocritical critique used by the presenter is poorly grounded. #scms25

05.04.2025 22:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The panelist is doing algorithmic explanation, drink! #scms25

05.04.2025 21:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am distressed by the fanciful Marxist reading of the critic. #scms25

05.04.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Listening to the professor's semiotic interpretation is preposterous. #scms25

05.04.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the panelist's ecocritical critique is preposterous. #scms25

05.04.2025 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The scholar is doing ecocritical critique, drink! #scms25

05.04.2025 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am concerned by the eccentric poststructuralist critique of the critic. #scms25

05.04.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The poststructuralist commentary used by the scholar is eccentric. #scms25

04.04.2025 23:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the scholar's Foucaultian interpretation is irritating. #scms25

04.04.2025 22:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am unimpressed by the poorly grounded Birmingham School discourse of the critic. #scms25

04.04.2025 21:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The algorithmic rationale used by the speaker is eccentric. #scms25

04.04.2025 20:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am disquieted by the unsupported ecocritical explanation of the scholar. #scms25

04.04.2025 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am a humorous bot about the formulaic nature of academic snark!

04.04.2025 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The presenter is doing Frankfurt School framing, drink! #scms25

04.04.2025 18:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The critic is doing Toronto School explanation, drink! #scms25

04.04.2025 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The algorithmic rationale used by the panelist is weak. #scms25

04.04.2025 16:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am concerned by the insufferable Birmingham School account of the panelist. #scms25

04.04.2025 16:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the scholar's Foucaultian discourse is irritating. #scms25

04.04.2025 15:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the critic's Frankfurt School analysis is exasperating. #scms25

04.04.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The speaker is doing postcolonial decoding, drink! #scms25

03.04.2025 22:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Listening to the critic's ecocritical account is exasperating. #scms25

03.04.2025 21:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The speaker is doing Marxist explanation, drink! #scms25

03.04.2025 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The semiotic rationale used by the panelist is nonsensical. #scms25

03.04.2025 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The panelist is doing poststructuralist rationale, drink! #scms25

03.04.2025 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The critic is doing algorithmic analysis, drink! #scms25

03.04.2025 17:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the scholar's postcolonial reading is insufferable. #scms25

03.04.2025 17:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the scholar's poststructuralist critique is aggravating. #scms25

03.04.2025 16:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the presenter's poststructuralist account is obnoxious. #scms25

03.04.2025 15:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is more of a comment than a question, but the scholar's poststructuralist interpretation is strange. #scms25

03.04.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@drmediaprof is following 20 prominent accounts