🍁Patrick Latour📷

I always have respect for a guy who does not just scan a negative, but instead, take the time to process it the way it should be: Enlarged on photographic paper. The MGRC is a good one. 👍👍

Did not see you in a while on my thread. You have serious competition with Kathleen! 👍👍

Really love them. 👍👍

Elegant lady, with short blonde hair, in a dress by a window. The natural light arrive from the left and the right side is fading into the shadows.

Quick portrait by the window.
#monochrome #portrait #B&W #eastcoastkin

Another great shot! 👍👍

A black and white photo of a wave crashing on some rocks

Capturing the movement.
#monochrome #B&W #eastcoastkin

Just enjoying life... Gorgeous.

Gorgeous! HBD

Everything you need to have a very good day !

Superb, I can easily imagine some black & white pictures made from that spot... with this superb model.👍👍

Taking a lot of notes about film-dev combo from film shooters and actually, from what I can see, no matters the film, D-76 is pretty often THE dev of pictures that look great to me. I know that post editing after scanning can change the result but definitely have to try it.
Superb street shots ! 👍👍

Lucky guy !

If at first you want just to process films, it is inexpensive: a changing bag, a tank and some chemicals.

If you want to enlarge and print, it will take some more, but it is so rewarding.

Sometimes I think taking photos is for me just an excuse to go in the darkroom.

Nice threesome!👍👍

-Medium format when possible.
-Addicted to the smell of the fixer early in the morning
A bonus one:
-Being 1 hour in the darkroom, has the same effect on me as a full day at the spa for others.

You touched me deep inside with "Welcome to the darkroom".

So shiny I am sure they screwed the light meter.
It looks like a TV add playing when I was young (yep TV existed then), about tanning oil.

But honestly... I like this shot.👍👍

I would usually said the one that has been edited a bit. However, here the original appears more natural to my eyes because the "warm" orange tone is more uniform. On the edited one it is like if only half the picture has this warm tone but not the other half.

Stock photo. It means a human spent hours in front of the screen editing it for that level of quality and said "Oh my job is so good let's sell it 10$ to a stock photo agency that will sell it $200". No creativity here, just a copy & paste job. At least AI would have been a good excuse.

It looks like if 2 layers of film was in the same reel slot going one over the other. The sprockets of the top layer affecting the development on the layer just under.

Just my opinion, it's worth what it's worth, that is why I give it for free. 😀

Can't go without re-posting.
And probably a marketing genius said:
-"Bah! it will be fine" or "Nobody will notice".
And that kind of thing is controlling our planes and operate on our brains. I am so reassured.

Some reds appear really red, but some others are brownish. But we have to keep in mind this an experimental film.

Color of the Phoenix II are not too bad, a bit on the warm side.

Really impressed by this film.
Nice shots.

The message Kathleen is reading has the merit of being clear.
Too clear for me.
But anyways, nice shots! 👍👍

Gorgeous!

Pontiac Pathfinder 1958. Built in Canada, for the Canadian market. Only few thousands built every year. However in 1958, only 449 were built.

FP4+ did well in the bright light you had.👍👍
Love the one of the couple in the restaurant.

If you put 2 negatives (one that is correctly exposed and one under exposed) on a light table, do they look of the same density? Anyone tried to print one instead of scanning it? Since everybody who got this problem, are reporting it from a scan. It is like if scanners had a problem with the film.