It appears that this legend owns a little bookstore โ and you can order books from him instead of Bezos. Link in next post.
25.01.2026 17:45 โ ๐ 12966 ๐ 3873 ๐ฌ 106 ๐ 97@abby8964.bsky.social
#Atheist ๐โ๐ค ๐ฅ&๐น
It appears that this legend owns a little bookstore โ and you can order books from him instead of Bezos. Link in next post.
25.01.2026 17:45 โ ๐ 12966 ๐ 3873 ๐ฌ 106 ๐ 97I donโt think itโs useful to continue this conversation anymore if you have not read the paper.
Do your readings or ask your classmates for a note.
In other words, itโs not just a good trader finding good stocks.
The benefit came from the firms whose performance they can influence.
No it does not. Authors find
1. leadersโ trading activities predicts future regulatory behaviors (Investigations, hearings).
2. leaders are also more likely to vote for/against bills that benefit/harm firms they bought
3.firm purchased by leaders experienced significant increase in federal contract
Dedham Priest pissing off all the right people by removing Jesus from the church's nativity scene and putting up an ICE WAS HERE sign in His place.
www.boston25news.com/news/local/i...
No.
1. The empirical test compares person A and B who are similar in age, party, tenure, etc.
2. They had similar returns in the past. So similar social connections/market knowledge.
3. After person A gain a leadership position, A had higher return than B.
โโwe distinguish between corporate news likely known in advance by company executives (e.g., dividend increases) and those arising from external or unpredictable events (e.g., lawsuits), we find that only the former are anticipated by leadersโ trades.โโ
03.12.2025 19:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โWe find that leadersโ stock purchases/sales reliably forecast a higher incidence of positive/negative corporate news over the following
year[โฆ] the same individuals did not exhibit this predictive ability prior to becoming leaders.โ
Without wiretapping everyone, this is what data can tell.
Person A asks broker to buy stock X. How would a broker know if that decision is driven by insider information or something else? Why should a broker ask a client โwhy do you want to buy thisโ?
03.12.2025 19:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 01. Sample is limited due to data availability.
2. I donโt think any other data on private investors collect demographics information (or would be legal to share private transactional-level data).
3. It referenced other research showing congress membersโ returns are higher than market average.
6. Paul Pelosi worked in finance/ knows people. Such private connections did not change at the SAME TIME as Pelosi became leader.
7. If the Pelosi family benefitted from such connections, their portfolios WOULD HAVE BEEN better BEFORE she assumed office.
But data says no. They only did better AFTER
4. The difference in return occurred only AFTER assuming leadership position.
5. Unless EVERY leaderโs family/social connection/market knowledge also dramatically changed at EXACTLY the same time as their position change, one cannot attribute the difference to these โcould beโ reasons.
1. Data covers 1995-2021. Your example is at most one data point.
2. Comparison is between leaders/non-leaders with matching tenure, party, chamber, sex, and age.
3. Their portfolios behave the SAME before assuming leadership position, so existing industry/family connections, did not matter.
I think the worst part is that people died, but ok
03.12.2025 16:39 โ ๐ 15 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0ICE DETAINED MARILYN. Fuck these people. www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
27.11.2025 16:35 โ ๐ 6781 ๐ 3160 ๐ฌ 229 ๐ 465Home Depo certainly avoided pissing off people on the right, but at the cost of losing customers on the left ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Seems like companies need to figure out the โmedianโ customerโs political stance now. future marketing/PR office hires may require a degree in political science ๐ซฃ๐ซฃ
There are speculations about them sharing parking area security videos etc but unconfirmed.
Also, they didnโt need to โsacrifice business to protect anyoneโ. A strongly worded statement, even if just for PR purposes, probably would have saved them from the boycott. Yet here they are ๐คทโโ๏ธ
ๅ่ฟๆฅ่ฏด็ปๅธธโ้ซๆตๅบฆโ่กจ่พพไนไผๅฏผ่ดๅฅนไปฌ่ฏญ่จๆ
็ปช่ดฌๅผใๆฏๅฆๆดๅคฉI love you ๆๅจๅดไธ็๏ผ่ฟไปทๅผๅฐฑ็จ้ไบ๏ผๆไบบๅฌไบไนไธไผไธๅฟใ
ๆ้ๅฐ็็ฑปไผผ็ไบบ้ฝๆฏๆ็ปด็ฎๅใไธๅฎๅ
จๆฏ็ผบ้ซ็ญๆ่ฒใๅฐฑๆฏๅนณๆถ่ๅญ้ๆฒกไปไนไบ๏ผๅช่ฝๅ็บฟ่ฟ่ฝฌใๆฏๅฆไธๆณๅฐ่ฆๆ
ๆธธไบๆปก่ๅญๅฐฑๅชๆ่ฟไธไปถไบ๏ผๅซ็้ฝๆณไธๅฐ๐คทโโ๏ธ
ๅไบซๆฌฒๅผบใๅๆฌข่ฏด่ชๅทฑ็็งไบ็่ฟ่ฝๅฟ๏ผๆ่งๅพ่ณๅฐๆฏไธไบๅคง็ทๅคงๅฆๅฐๅคๅบๆขๅซไบบ็ๅฅฝ๐๐คช
24.11.2025 18:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0MAGA Christian evangelical ไนไผ่ฏด็พๅฝไธ้ฃๆฅไธไบบ้
ๅ
ณ็ณปๆทกๆผ ใๅชๆฏไปไปฌๆๆ็โๆฟ้ไบบๅ/ๅฝๆณฐๆฐๅฎโ็ๆ
ๆฏ๏ผwhite dominant Christian nation)ๅๆไปฌๆๆ็ไธๆฏไธๅไบ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐คทโโ๏ธ
ๅ่
ๅพๅคไบบๆฟๆฒป่ฎค็ฅๆททไนฑ๏ผๆฟ็ญpreferenceๆฒกๆ้ป่พไธ่ดๆงใๆฏๅฆไนๅAOC้ฎๅท่ฟๅฅน็ๆฏๆ่
๏ผ็ปๆๅพๅคๆๅฅน็้ๆฐไนๆไบTrump๏ผ็็ฑๆฏโyou both fight for the little guysโ ๐ซฃ๐คทโโ๏ธ้คไบ็ฎ็ชๅฃๅ่ฟ่ฏดไปไน
the *lack* of response/action (e.g. no official statement condemning ICE kidnapping workers on their property) is enough reason for local residents to be angry at Home Depot
24.11.2025 17:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sharing to my network since I have had several of you outreach. U.S. DOGE Service 21,181 followers The executive order establishing U.S. DOGE Service (USDS) is still in effect. USDS is still partnering with agencies to
NEW: Amid reports that the U.S. DOGE Service is "dead," alleged Acting Administrator Amy Gleason breaks her silence on LinkedIn: โIโm alive.โ
24.11.2025 16:40 โ ๐ 796 ๐ 199 ๐ฌ 72 ๐ 241. *Men* are in trouble. Why should I care?
2. Are they gonna adopt kids? No. They want โtheir own bloodโ, not โfatherhoodโ.
3. Another piece of white men screaming about *me, me,me!!!*.
Itโs always about *them* and their precious little penis.
As is the example in the Herald, not the exception, white men in positions of responsibility are nearly always presented flatteringly in photos.
In this example, the Herald created an inset, choosing a photo of Mayor Wu that met a lower standard than the photo of Josh Kraft. Just politics? No.
alas, there's a lot of sanewashing in this piece - even as it expresses frustration in RFK, it treats him as a legitimate, good faith actor in a way that's just not true.
24.11.2025 16:39 โ ๐ 704 ๐ 99 ๐ฌ 25 ๐ 6They bought guns because they โwant to do somethingโ about government agents โkidnapping individualsโ.
Isnโt that what the Second Amendment groups support? Arm yourself against a tyrannical government?
Why itโs a crime now just when ICE is on the other side of the barrel? ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐คก๐คก
Well done, @theharvardcrimson.bsky.social. ๐ฏ. No notes.
21.11.2025 00:25 โ ๐ 57 ๐ 21 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1In the winter of 2005, just after their wedding, Lawrence H. Summers and his wife, Elisa F. New, went to financier Jeffrey E. Epsteinโs private island in the Caribbean during their honeymoon.
Dhruv T. Patel and Cam N. Srivastava report.
Reading comprehension?
โan unnamed organization budgeted 3milโ is not remotely the same as โTrump paid 3 mil to fund Jan 6โ