Immo Schott

@isaacbaley.bsky.social @matthiasmeier.bsky.social @joachimjungherr.bsky.social

📢Last day to submit!

"Firm Heterogeneity and Macro," Dec 11/12 in Bonn.

Keynotes by Ellen McGrattan (University of Minnesota) and Vasco Carvalho (University of Cambridge)

#econsky

⚠️Call for papers for the 4th Macro & firm heterogeneity conference in December in Bonn. Keynotes by Ellen McGrattan & Vasco Carvalho. Submit your paper by July 15th. More info here: tinyurl.com/5n8nyy2u #EconTwitter

I put together a starter pack of all the academic macroeconomists I could find on the platform.

It's short. Please message me if you would like to be added.

go.bsky.app/RYnjd8k

#econsky etc.

3rd Workshop on Firm Heterogeneity and Macroeconomics in on!

First day: supply chains, firm-worker risks, ideas, growth, financial frictions and firm adjustments

@joachimjungherr.bsky.social #Econsky @treinelt.bsky.social

This is a joint paper with Joachim, Matthias, and Timo. This version of the paper is part of the IFDP series, where IFDP stands for "International Finance Discussion Paper" and "International Finance" is the name of the division that I work for at the Federal Reserve Board.

We use the model to study unconventional monetary policy (UMP). UMP lowers long-term rates when the short-term rate is at the ZLB. This has the effect that firms borrow at longer durations. The increase in debt overhang makes UMP less effective than conventional monetary policy.

2) Debt overhang means that firms lower their investment if a part of the benefit goes to its long-term creditors. A contractionary monetary policy shock worsens debt overhang, because tighter monetary policy is deflationary, increasing the real burden of outstanding debt.

Two channels explain our result: 1) Rollover-risk implies that if a lot of debt matures at the time when interest rates have gone up, this increases firms' cost of capital, lowering investment.

The model replicates the empirical observation that after a contractionary monetary policy shock, firms with shorter remaining debt maturity react more strongly, meaning that they reduce investment by more and that they see larger increases in credit spreads.

We construct a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, long-term debt, and costly default. Firms raise capital, consisting of equity, long-term debt, and short-term debt. Safer firms endogenously have higher leverage, lower credit spreads, and more long-maturity debt.

This heterogeneity across firms is important if we want to understand which firms are most affected by monetary policy. It is also a crucial for assessing the macroeconomic effects of rate changes, which depends on the distribution of firms across remaining maturities.

We combine balance sheet & bond-level data to construct a measure of the share of a firm's debt which matures at any given point in time. Using panel local projections, we show that investment & credit spreads react more strongly to MP when firms have higher maturing bond shares.

"Corporate Debt Maturity Matters for Monetary Policy" is now available as an IFDP. We show that empirically and in a model, firms react more strongly to monetary policy (MP) when a larger fraction of their debt matures. This has important implications for the effectiveness of MP.

Greek fiscal humour is just the best.

Greek minister suggests that Germany should sell some islands to plug its fiscal hole.

New paper with @jvoth.bsky.social
"From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler"
Click (pdf) 👉 lnkd.in/g2wtSvUm

We're hiring an assistant prof in macroeconomics @ Hertie in Berlin, together with the IfW Kiel 👉 apply.interfolio.com/133002