Anonymous Scientist's Avatar

Anonymous Scientist

@accursedhats.bsky.social

53 Followers  |  26 Following  |  299 Posts  |  Joined: 10.03.2025  |  2.6168

Latest posts by accursedhats.bsky.social on Bluesky

We must never forget that Elon is directly responsible for millions of deaths due to his destruction of USAID. He is an evil monster. The Nazi comparison is not merely a hypothetical analogy

16.02.2026 13:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œBy white people who wanted to preserve their politico-economic interests and had a second order interest in abolition”

16.02.2026 13:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Dave is right here

04.02.2026 00:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

She is nothing less than an American hero. her courage and conviction is breathtaking. deep down they know she is right and that is why she is targeted.

We support you @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social

03.02.2026 00:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No it’s not. Itβ€˜s just not a good life which is something different

29.01.2026 11:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You are right. The thing that makes Vinay’s case even more tragic is that he legitimately was a creative and impactful scholar. You could disagree with him, but his arguments were very strong.

I’m not sure if Huberman ever was at that level.

28.01.2026 14:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Alex Pretti made the β€œmistake” of helping up a woman who had been pepper sprayed in the face and pushed down on the ground.

26.01.2026 02:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Fetterman Once Agreed ICE Was an 'American Gestapo.' Under Trump 2.0, He's Praising the Agency | Common Dreams U.S. Sen. John Fetterman defended Immigration and Customs Enforcement amid criticisms about its lawless and authoritarian behavior.

He made this comment in July 2025. We don’t need fake things to be made at. there is enough real stuff.

www.commondreams.org/news/fetterm...

@jeremymberg.bsky.social

25.01.2026 02:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Fair enough. Then maybe she should just keep her mouth shut then?

20.01.2026 19:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is there no hill the Democrats are willing to die on?

Maybe NIH funding is not that hill, I understand. But maybe it should be? Protecting NIH funding is among the most bipartisan and politically prudent hills to claim.

20.01.2026 19:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The tone of her message is just so infuriating. MYF at 2025 levels is a huge cut. Shame on her for the spin.

bsky.app/profile/accu...

20.01.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So I find this message pretty enraging. "More research grants awarded..." Is this spin...?

If I'm going to be screwed over by the politicians I voted for, at least they could be honest about the fact that they screwed me over when they had to make trade-offs.

20.01.2026 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This semi-self congratulating message ("$415mm increase") omits the the fact that maintaining MYF at 2025 level is a massive effective NIH cut (as you know).

20.01.2026 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

G Elliot Morris is not serious. Every piece of data always shows how great Dems are doing. In this example party ID exactly where it was in Trump 1.

Real progressives are serious about data.

16.01.2026 14:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So I just have a lot of skepticism

16.01.2026 13:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t want to overgeneralize but in my field (translational med end), the field is saturated by extremely low quality quasi mill papers. I do editorial work too and we just don’t see high quality papers coming in from Chinese lead author groups.

16.01.2026 13:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Denis how much do you believe in the argument here about Chinese emerging dominance?

16.01.2026 13:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You rightly are skeptical of Susan Collins but sad to say we should be equally skeptical of Democrats holding the line here as well.

16.01.2026 13:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Absolutely outrageous on so many levels

17.12.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How frustrating to spend multiple hours getting this ready, as demanded by NIH, and then to have them delete the data I manually entered.

It's almost like this administration doesn't like scientists! (sarcasm)

03.12.2025 21:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good. The reporting here has focused too little on Summers as himself a predator:

bsky.app/profile/quan...

19.11.2025 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

100%! I have been really disappointed that the reporting has not talked about Summers himself being a predator:

bsky.app/profile/quan...

19.11.2025 19:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
As Summers Sought Clandestine Relationship With Woman He Called a Mentee, Epstein Was His β€˜Wing Man’ | News | The Harvard Crimson When former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee, he turned to a longtime associate for guidance: convicted sex offender Jef...

We must condemn this disgusting behavior. If not, it becomes normalized and accepted.

Details here: www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...

19.11.2025 13:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This man should not be allowed to be around young women or students in general.

β€œStepping back from public engagements” is not a sufficient remedy. He needs to be ejected from academia forever.

19.11.2025 13:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The reporting on Larry Summers has totally missed the point. It’s not just about him pal-ing around with Epstein.

It’s about his predatory actions against junior Female colleagues and mentees.

Notice that he doesn’t even apologize for the despicable sexual harassment he was doing

19.11.2025 13:42 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

πŸ’―

14.11.2025 14:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ya totally, it is shocking reveal of privilege that this person thinks working at 9pm is something extraordinary. I work on emails and papers every evening at this time.

14.11.2025 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is it β€œradically leftist” to believe that marginalized groups should not be excluded from NIH research? …that throwing away public resources by terminating studies just before they complete?

If so, I wear the label proudly.

And it is absolutely my job to criticize such policies at work.

14.11.2025 05:53 β€” πŸ‘ 82    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

Shame on them Jenna. I am proud of you. May your bravery permeate to all of us.

14.11.2025 14:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The hypocrisy is astonishing

14.11.2025 14:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@accursedhats is following 20 prominent accounts