Rita Wenxin Wang's Avatar

Rita Wenxin Wang

@wangwrita.bsky.social

Aspiring civil rights lawyer by day, freelance writer and novelist by night. they/他. NYU Law ‘26. Formerly NAACP LDF. Tweets and writing my own.

885 Followers  |  253 Following  |  31 Posts  |  Joined: 06.10.2023  |  2.1667

Latest posts by wangwrita.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

@hellgatenyc.com with the sight gag of the night as they slowly swap out the cuomo photo to zoom in on his nipple ring

05.11.2025 02:21 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 1

The Supreme Court’s majority right wing indicated in oral arguments that they think racism is over on the same day that the vice president defended the “I love Hitler” guy, and that the NYT reported that the current administration plans to accept only white, English-speaking refugees.

15.10.2025 21:56 — 👍 4828    🔁 1839    💬 69    📌 51

People missing an important point about folks getting fired for whatever they said about Charlie Kirk: Americans are being conditioned to be snitches on their fellow citizens who don’t toe a party line on what is “allowed” to be expressed. And employers are going along. It’s the new secret police

14.09.2025 03:32 — 👍 37873    🔁 11416    💬 1424    📌 679

The repression of trans people is not, by and large, a grassroots outpouring of hatred from the American people. It's something that's been carefully planted and tended over years by a handful of media people and their pet reporters.

18.06.2025 15:33 — 👍 5979    🔁 1918    💬 5    📌 82
Just a big ol' Stryker combat vehicle (mini-tank) perched on a hillside above the border wall.

Just a big ol' Stryker combat vehicle (mini-tank) perched on a hillside above the border wall.

Looking into Arizona from the border city of Nogales, Mexico.

From proyectopuente.com.mx/2025/06/17/v...

18.06.2025 14:33 — 👍 67    🔁 12    💬 5    📌 3

fuck Supreme Court released Skrmetti

Roberts opinion, liberals dissent

the awful outcome--blessing anti-trans discrimination--isnt in and of itself surprising, but it's a bit stunning the way they're pretending the Equal Protection Clause isn't even *relevant*
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

18.06.2025 14:20 — 👍 934    🔁 251    💬 21    📌 18

It is impossible not to read this in conjunction with the Supreme Court's heartrbreaking, awful decision in Skrmetti allowing states to deny transgender teens the health care they need.

18.06.2025 14:36 — 👍 843    🔁 265    💬 15    📌 12
Preview
The Army Was the Only Life She Knew. Trump’s Trans Ban Cast Her Out.

This is just utterly heartbreaking. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/u...

16.06.2025 17:25 — 👍 270    🔁 54    💬 7    📌 1

Breaking: The Trevor Project received a stop-work order last night on its contract with the national 988 suicide prevention hotline. The Trump administration is eliminating the option for LGBTQ callers to the hotline to press 3 and connect with someone who specializes in LGBTQ mental health.

18.06.2025 13:59 — 👍 7930    🔁 4383    💬 252    📌 1302

In light of SCOTUS's ruling in Skrmetti, @brittneymac15.bsky.social asked doctors what trans youth and their families need to know about navigating this. @teenvogue.com

experts advise continuing to talk to affirming healthcare providers if you have them and exploring options for care out-of-state.

18.06.2025 14:24 — 👍 143    🔁 111    💬 1    📌 3

Solidarity with trans people today, and always.

18.06.2025 14:25 — 👍 1017    🔁 258    💬 9    📌 13
Preview
An Urbanist NYC Voter Guide And the pragmatic case for Zohran Mamdani over Andrew Cuomo

Here it is: my urbanist NYC voter guide. While Zellnor Myrie and Brad Lander are (by far) the best candidates, you’re going to have to rank either Zohran or Cuomo if you want your vote to count.

I dove deep into this decision and came to the conclusion that Zohran is the superior choice.

18.06.2025 13:09 — 👍 443    🔁 56    💬 15    📌 21

Most importantly, states can now just ban gender affirming care for everyone, including adults. We'll likely see that coming soon in addition to federal government efforts to eliminate access for all trans people.

18.06.2025 14:28 — 👍 383    🔁 53    💬 3    📌 4

Sotomayor, counter to Roberts and the court's majority, explains how the law "obviously" classifies based on sex.

18.06.2025 14:28 — 👍 383    🔁 55    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

BREAKING: In a 6-3 Roberts decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care is not subject to heightened scrutiny. This decision will strip millions of trans people off their constitutional rights.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

18.06.2025 14:17 — 👍 1294    🔁 486    💬 45    📌 116
Tennessee’s law expressly classifies on the basis of sex
and transgender status, so the Constitution and settled
precedent require the Court to subject it to intermediate
scrutiny. The majority contorts logic and precedent to say
otherwise, inexplicably declaring it must uphold Tennessee’s categorical ban on lifesaving medical treatment so
long as “‘any reasonably conceivable state of facts’” might
justify it. Ante, at 21. Thus, the majority subjects a law
that plainly discriminates on the basis of sex to mere rational-basis review. By retreating from meaningful judicial
review exactly where it matters most, the Court abandons
transgender children and their families to political whims.
In sadness, I dissent.

Tennessee’s law expressly classifies on the basis of sex and transgender status, so the Constitution and settled precedent require the Court to subject it to intermediate scrutiny. The majority contorts logic and precedent to say otherwise, inexplicably declaring it must uphold Tennessee’s categorical ban on lifesaving medical treatment so long as “‘any reasonably conceivable state of facts’” might justify it. Ante, at 21. Thus, the majority subjects a law that plainly discriminates on the basis of sex to mere rational-basis review. By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the Court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims. In sadness, I dissent.

Justice Sotomayor's dissent in Skrmetti (which she's now reading from the bench) is deeply pained, accusing her colleagues of abandoning "transgender children and their families to political whims" and badly damaging "bedrock" principles of equal protection. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

18.06.2025 14:25 — 👍 8533    🔁 2788    💬 127    📌 111

Hi Hailey! I am sorry, I just saw this. You are welcome to submit in when we open up for submissions in August. No need to be a lawyer or law student.

09.06.2025 16:32 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
LinkedIn This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

Please feel to reach out to me with any questions. You can find out more about what we look for in online articles here: lnkd.in/ezGhSvpv.

02.02.2025 21:24 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I am particularly interested in articles written by folks not traditionally published in elite Law Reviews, including non T14 law students, currently or formerly incarcerated folks, or other folks particularly affected by the law or traditionally underrepresented in legal academia.

02.02.2025 21:24 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Thrilled to announce that I have been appointed to be an Online Editor for NYU Law Review! Article submissions are now open and we accept submissions between 5000 and 15000 words. Authors can submit both on Scholastica and via NYULRevOnline@gmail.com.

02.02.2025 21:24 — 👍 12    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Look, like I said most of the “wheee we love dead CEOs” stuff is performative and Super Online. I doubt it accomplishes anything. But the hand-wringing about it is overdone. It’s like the OJ Simpson verdict. I don’t agree with it, I don’t think it’s productive, but I understand why it happened.

07.12.2024 20:17 — 👍 1563    🔁 98    💬 96    📌 10

I can understand how it got on the Michelin guide now

08.12.2024 01:26 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
A statute of a minion with heterochromia (and a Santa hat)

A statute of a minion with heterochromia (and a Santa hat)

went to a michelin guide recommended restaurant and their central decor piece was this minion with heterochromia

07.12.2024 23:19 — 👍 64    🔁 2    💬 6    📌 0

Privileged people generally experience the system as biased against and as singling them out for abuse, because they cannot imagine that’s just how the system treats people.

07.12.2024 15:04 — 👍 5602    🔁 1152    💬 159    📌 37
Preview
Federal Judiciary Misleadingly Conflates Low Number Of Sexual Harassment Complaints With Lack Of Misconduct The AO seems not to understand that there is no greater power disparity in the legal profession than between a fresh-out-of-law-school clerk and a life-tenured federal judge.

❗Just 9% of the 78 EDR matters initiated by federal court employees from 2021-23 were initiated by *term law clerks,* according to the AO’s 2023 Workplace Report.

That’s ~7 complaints over a 2 YR PERIOD, or <5 misconduct complaints per year, in @abovethelaw.com abovethelaw.com/2024/12/fede...

07.12.2024 14:06 — 👍 4    🔁 4    💬 1    📌 2

(One of) the (many) problem(s) with the legal profession is being welcoming and civil to people who want to take away the rights of the marginalized and then insisting that the marginalized be welcoming and civil to them, too

07.12.2024 15:53 — 👍 134    🔁 23    💬 2    📌 1

Here’s the piece we mentioned on @strictscrutiny.bsky.social - @kmtani.bsky.social’s powerful meditation on today’s Supreme Court. Long but worth every word

harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/u...

05.12.2024 22:24 — 👍 91    🔁 24    💬 9    📌 0
Patrick as scientist "the starter packs I am in"
Patrick with board nailed to head "my posts"

Patrick as scientist "the starter packs I am in" Patrick with board nailed to head "my posts"

I must not be the only one who feels this way

02.12.2024 01:21 — 👍 840    🔁 168    💬 22    📌 23

I guess they want to discuss it at Nuremberg later

06.12.2024 23:45 — 👍 78    🔁 16    💬 1    📌 1

@wangwrita is following 20 prominent accounts