Isn't this for IVs and not NIVs? I might have misread the piece.
14.01.2026 18:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@justanesta.com.bsky.social
Data journalist. Into economics, basketball, baseball, film. All views and opinions posted are mine. Don't let him cook @ justanesta.com. Let's love.
Isn't this for IVs and not NIVs? I might have misread the piece.
14.01.2026 18:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The other thing is that people perceive transit/healthcare as "welfare" in opposition to growth when really the inability to build lots of good infrastructure or keep life expectancy up are *drags* on US economic growth
13.01.2026 20:39 β π 56 π 6 π¬ 1 π 0You undoubtedly have a more well researched perspective into it than I do so I'm sure I'd learn more from of your thinking on it. I assumed we'd need to do something like your latter suggestion eventually. I also thought there are ways to smooth out a VAT to be ~proportional or slightly progressive.
11.01.2026 20:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That makes sense. Of course there's a variety of factors but my prior is that absent major pop growth/immigration and given the aging demo profile and higher propensity of HC consumption it would be hard to pencil out substantial expansions of social programs just through raising the $600K rate.
11.01.2026 20:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm as excited about Claude Code / Opus 4.5 as anyone.
It's helped me create things this year that I couldn't have done otherwise.
But I notice often it lacks "common sense."
Meaning, it makes decisions that "work" but shouldn't be made.
This whole thread π―
10.01.2026 17:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It is certainly erroneous to group HHs in that part of the distribution with the ~95+%ile portion which as you mention is a more meaningful cut point in the distribution. I guess I am trying to draw almost three distinctions more for political reasons rather than purely mathematical ones.
10.01.2026 17:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0HHs between the ~67th to ~90th/95th income %tile need to pay somewhat higher taxes for the gov't to have the revenue for the policies to make the US a (imo) more just *and* economically dynamic place. I have a fear this becomes more difficult to do if these HHs are defined as "middle class".
10.01.2026 17:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Totally, and this makes sense as a framework statistically. (Kind of makes me want to dive into the SCF microdata and flesh it out a bit more). I realize this is kind of semantic but I'm getting hung up on it for a particular reason:
10.01.2026 17:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I know you are certainly aware of this but folks in that income bracket are also more likely to possess other types of economic levers and assets which might not show up on the HH W-2 or even balance sheet but exacerbate this distribution.
10.01.2026 15:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I've been thinking about this a lot and I agree it's necessary to update priors but find the idea "my HH makes ~$200k and I am ~middle class" is still pervasive.
While "rich" & "middle class" are of course nebulous I still believe that HHs in the 80th percentile are better described by the former.
Your periodic reminder that you have the right to find out why your health insurer denied your claim.
We built a tool to help you do it: projects.propublica.org/claimfile/
I'm not sure how it works in Canada but for the BLS I believe the employment rate is just (1 - unemployment rate) i.e. (# employed / labor force) and the EPR is the (# employed / civilian noninstitutional pop). So different denominators.
09.01.2026 13:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Very cool, thank you! The comparison table is incredibly helpful. Are there vignettes any of the functions?
16.12.2025 13:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Reminds me of this apparently real thing from awhile back.
11.12.2025 02:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0my stance has always been that we have an economy so as to have people, and arguments that we need to make people to have an economy are silly
05.12.2025 13:44 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0I had a similar jolt when I stumbled on something the CDC published from ~the turn of the century.
bsky.app/profile/just...
A chart from FRED of the change in Food Away from Home, Shelter, Food at Home, Services Less Rent, Recreation, and Alcoholic Beverages from the CPI and average hourly earnings of private sector production & nonsupervisory employees from the establishment survey from January 2019 to September 2025.
I don't disagree. I will note that it's somewhat striking how different this picture looks if you start the base period two years earlier. fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgr...
02.12.2025 19:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Roger Ailes, TikTok, and the Glonzofication of America
01.11.2025 17:55 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Reminds me of this very insightful game from @davidawaldron.bsky.social www.waldrn.com/partisan-hack/
29.10.2025 02:13 β π 26 π 3 π¬ 4 π 1This is now well over 10 years old but it's a well written, digestible, more theoretical overview that I really did find helpful to clarify it for me.
think-like-a-git.net
I have seen this everywhere too. Did you ever find out more about Moody's data source? I'm curious what specific types of consumption that skews towards lower-income consumers their sample might be under-representing (and why).
15.10.2025 15:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I had a piece a few years ago with a similar cut of CPS ASEC data. Really striking how deleterious the GFC was (and to a lesser extent how much a boon pre-'22 Covid was)
www.investopedia.com/millennial-h...
Yeah his vice was dip and not alcohol.
12.10.2025 01:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π
06.10.2025 18:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Before I led BLS I was not as acutely aware of how many businesses, firms, and individual jobs depend on a stream of public use data. One estimate is that the $2 billion the US spends on economic data creates a $200+ billion industry of 'data-intensive' businesses. pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/...
03.10.2025 17:58 β π 35 π 7 π¬ 2 π 3Omg!! I also have been passing extra date component strings to `paste0()` for years. Lubricate truly is a gift that keeps on giving.
02.10.2025 18:59 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Just registered. I'm looking forward to it!
30.09.2025 16:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you for posting. Just put in an application!
24.09.2025 19:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0First, well, yeah that is always what the GOP proposes. We'll need to raise revenue by a third or cut benefits by a quarter to provide the trust fund with another 75 years of "solvency." Not surprising the GOP wants poor people to bear the cost. But I want to dig in a bit here.
19.09.2025 18:31 β π 54 π 17 π¬ 5 π 3