Leader Jeffries asked about his relationship with Speaker Mike Johnson.

"It's a forward looking, candid and communicative relationship"

Source: shorturl.at/2fd8s

Reminds me of Austin Powers.

Seems to me he loves the legal process. Remind me again, how long it takes for his court cases to reach a jury?

I hope he has his internet history under control.

Competence. Gotta love it. Hire all the best people.

Kennedy graduated from Vanderbilt University and the University of Virginia School of Law before attending Oxford University.

But, sure, he's just folksy.

What a weirdo.

This is our society struggling with technology being released into the wild without reflection, planning or regulation. AI alarms have been raised for years with no attention from Congress. It's despicable. Big business stands to gain, so why wonder why this is happening?

artists should really repost more, considering how long each drawing takes.

anyway, take this. ive forced you to scroll past my art again

deportation without due process; destroying retirement savings for millions; ignoring court orders (calling 9-0 supreme court loss a win; ICE arresting a mayor; DOGE cutting critical programs; proposing massive cuts to poor with giant tax cut to rich; attacking law firms/universities...

smfh

Good luck JT

Thx for taking the time to reply!! :)

Lol. Same. So gross.

Stay focused people. He is gutting the economy, deporting without due process and attacking the judiciary.

I’m getting to the point where I’d prefer it if all media only reported on three problems that have been and will continue to be a problem: due process, the economy and threats to judiciary.

Trump continues to flood the zone. The Pope image, all the insults & other shiny objects just distract.

Thank you! This made my day. You are the best.

When I search for news coverage of this, it’s all international news agencies, and almost nothing here at home. :(

How are you sure it was ranch dressing? I’m not sure I’d risk the taste test. :)

Thanks for the helpful reply!

That’s kind of what I was getting at. The article made it seem like he wanted to do a new type of testing for vaccines, and people didn’t like that. But the paper I found seemed to indicate that placebo testing vaccines is warranted in some scenarios.

I did read the abstract and more of it. Maybe I didn’t read it right. It’s technical. I wish you wouldn’t just be mean right out of the gate. But I appreciate you taking the time to respond.

I am not sure why HHS or Reuters said this was a radical change. I read that double blind, placebo trials are the gold standard for testing.

But the reading also seems to say that use or non use of placebo isn’t clear cut and varies from scenario to scenario.

Did I miss something?