's Avatar

@danjac.bsky.social

675 Followers  |  637 Following  |  4,670 Posts  |  Joined: 24.11.2024  |  2.471

Latest posts by danjac.bsky.social on Bluesky

If I were a drug kingpin, collapse in international intelligence sharing is the sort of thing I'd support. Plus you can always get rid of rivals cleanly by leaking their location to the US government.

11.11.2025 19:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What if your personal Optimus stops you doing insider trading

11.11.2025 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
11.11.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why is Robbie Gibb on the BBC Board? It's like putting Herman Goering in charge of RAF Fighter Command

11.11.2025 12:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Sure, but then what EU company would want to invest in business ties with the UK when they could get rug-pulled by a Reform government triggering the guillotines?

11.11.2025 11:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Their salary and perks will convince them otherwise. There's a reason these mediocrities keep quiet, they'd never thrive in an organisation that promotes talent and independence.

11.11.2025 11:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hence why Trump's interest. Any competing source of dissent - or reality - has to be bought off or sued out of existence.

11.11.2025 11:43 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As opposed to Rachel Reeves, who intends to tax it

10.11.2025 17:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

British Labour Party: hold my pint

10.11.2025 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Laura Kuenssberg. Fanbase will lose their minds and hope it gets explained in the Christmas special.

10.11.2025 16:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Question is whether it's a 2000 bubble or 2008 bubble

10.11.2025 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is what happens when you have a secret police making arrests based on quotas, like the NKVD under Stalin.

10.11.2025 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The US Democrats are the equivalent of the Russian Communist Party. Not because they are in any way communist, but because they provide a useful fig-leaf of democratic legitimacy to the regime, as the RCP does for Putin.

10.11.2025 15:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

TDD maybe?

10.11.2025 11:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If it's a Thursday the air supply drop will be cans of pea soup

10.11.2025 11:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably going to have more tweedy inbreds than a fox hunt

10.11.2025 11:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Makes me think of the Bond villain Hugo Drax, but he was an environmentalist

09.11.2025 10:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember reading Shirley Temple was US ambassador to Czechoslovakia, which sounded weird because in my mind she was still 6 years old like in the old movies, like a little kid negotiating with Vaclav Havel

09.11.2025 10:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A shithole police state, doesn't deserve to be considered a peer democracy

09.11.2025 09:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

US is really selling itself as a tourist mecca. Choose between its favourite theme parks, Airport Departure Lounge World or ICE Detention Center World

09.11.2025 09:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

On the plus side their readership are dying like flies

09.11.2025 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hard to say whether due to pandering to their increasingly unhinged ownership or their increasingly insane readership or both

09.11.2025 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

My mum reports that Esztergom was lovely

09.11.2025 09:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*Does not apply when in charge of a moving vehicle or attempting surgery

09.11.2025 09:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not surprising that the number 1 site for human slop becomes the number 1 site for AI slop

09.11.2025 07:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What if Dan Dare, but the Treens win

09.11.2025 07:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we retire "low information" and just call them stupid?

09.11.2025 07:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Proper directors should wear a ball gown

09.11.2025 07:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Welsh futurism certainly

08.11.2025 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even the most authoritarian dictators wouldn't be stupid enough to starve their most loyal followers and leave their bureaucrats and soldiers go without pay.

08.11.2025 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@danjac is following 20 prominent accounts