's Avatar

@spoolpin.bsky.social

1 Followers  |  23 Following  |  12 Posts  |  Joined: 27.11.2023  |  1.9561

Latest posts by spoolpin.bsky.social on Bluesky

Nilered decaffeinated Red Bull moment?

24.07.2025 02:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
U.S. NAVY  BASIC MECHANISMS OF FIRE CONTROL COMPUTERS  MECHANICAL COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONAL FILM  27794
YouTube video by PeriscopeFilm U.S. NAVY BASIC MECHANISMS OF FIRE CONTROL COMPUTERS MECHANICAL COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONAL FILM 27794

There are a few good ones about mechanical computation, like youtu.be/gwf5mAlI7Ug

07.06.2025 15:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Like falcon 9?

05.06.2025 22:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The idea that learning how to think is a dehumanizing task makes me sad.

07.05.2025 15:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Does shipping one giant box of multiple customersโ€™ PCBs from china and then repackaging them in the US get around that?

10.04.2025 20:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Do law firms tend to have in-house programmers to handle data ingest/filtering/analysis workloads? I realized I know almost nothing about legal document handling infrastructure.

24.07.2024 16:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The argument is not that stricter speech laws have *absolutely no* negative consequences, itโ€™s that the harms are less than the benefits.

19.07.2024 20:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh, I thought you were mad at the article. My bad

04.04.2024 22:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Is this not literally what they wrote in the article? โ€œIgnoring that public officials are elected โ€“ not hired โ€“ and Scott won the 2020 mayor's race with a landslide 70 percentโ€

I feel like I must be reading a different article than everyone else.

04.04.2024 21:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I thought the really litigious ones were the het omegaverse fanfic writers?

23.01.2024 03:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Writing an article about the remaining risks seems like a pretty strong implicit acknowledgement that things have gone well so far, doesnโ€™t it? It seems pretty disingenuous to call this a good thing bad article.

20.01.2024 17:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The "journalist" who wrote this can't even read the source they cite _in the article_ to realize it's a -800, not a -9. What a joke.

14.01.2024 06:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@spoolpin is following 20 prominent accounts