yep!
29.01.2026 11:36 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@holliplex.bsky.social
Floating in space
yep!
29.01.2026 11:36 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A serious answer to this: this has also been a problem with programming and mathematics, but one which is starting to be solved, which is why engineers are freaking out en-masse. solving it for โfuzzierโ tasks is an even bigger challenge but I am less and less confident that it is insurmountable.
29.01.2026 10:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0oh right
26.01.2026 22:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Here it is: archive.ph/suv0 For some reason the NYT got him to review the last book; it isnโt very good
26.01.2026 22:19 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I hesitate to recommend it without revisiting, but I recall there was a Christopher Hitchens essay on this very subject
26.01.2026 22:16 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And itโs a bit of a mystery as to why not. Thereโs no obvious reason why, but things seem to divide neatly between low-dimensional polynomials (practical to compute) and exponentials (impractical)
23.12.2025 07:39 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We divide problems into those that can be solved in polynomial time (e.g. x^2, x^3) and those that require exponential time (2^x). The first are tractable, i.e. can be solved quickly. A problem solvable in x^1000 wouldnโt be tractable, but for some reason those donโt seem to come up in real problems
23.12.2025 07:38 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0OK! I am not a mathematician but found plain old ChatGPT to be shockingly good at correctly explaining undergraduate-level maths and physics problems, and there are now plenty of examples of LLMs solving problems that are beyond me and definitely outside the training data.
20.12.2025 08:16 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Also, FWIW and contra OP, current LLMs are unreasonably good at solving difficult maths problems.
19.12.2025 15:45 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I think there is a very large difference between asking ChatGPT to do something and building a specialised tool which uses LLMs as an important component. The tools which are transforming software engineering are the latter and I frankly don't buy that indexing isn't a similarly tractable problem.
19.12.2025 15:41 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0App Store pricing started out way too low because of the initial association with the cost of a song on iTunes โ so there was never a premium tier and the low-cost stuff went FTP, which is poison. Also Apple encouraged it; some obscenely large slice of their services revenue is Candy Crush IAPs.
17.12.2025 16:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0chatbots need to be situated within the longer history of "repl psychosis"
15.05.2025 01:44 โ ๐ 60 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 2the more important question is whether or not LLMs can be usefully enrolled in the scientific process. i'd definitely answer yes, but "can" doesn't mean "will."
09.12.2025 17:16 โ ๐ 16 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0yeah, I think my main ask of something like claude code is to have more control and information about what's going on, especially with the subagents. I want to be able to selectively prune the past, toggle abilities and permissions etc. But no idea how to make it not-overwhelming to a human.
09.12.2025 20:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I'm really looking forward to the day when we collectively realise that in the field of context management, "append to chat log" is only one of many possible approaches. No idea what else is out there but it feels like a large possibility space to me
09.12.2025 20:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thatโs true, but itโs not where their power comes from. Rather the opposite
05.12.2025 22:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I tend to think of SWE as a version of โlabour aristocracyโ for this reason. One of the few ways we are actually similar to engineers of yore is our social position within the firm. Weโre not its owners exactly, but something like ownership accrues to the only people who know how to make it function
05.12.2025 22:04 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sadly I think this is not possible because 1800 is the only 19thc year whose digits add up to 9
04.12.2025 12:20 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Honestly if you asked me โhow many people would guess the correct URL and bother to try to access it in this half an hour windowโ I would answer โa small numberโ with not much more confidence than that. I wouldnโt be surprised if you told me it was 3 or 3000
02.12.2025 10:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If their analytics are really not set up to record requests which hit cache and the default cache time is 10 minutes, 32 hits in half an hour is too many. Also Iโd be really surprised if whatever analytics package WP-engine uses did not take this into account
02.12.2025 10:25 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Do you know about Sid Meierโs CPU Bach?
21.11.2025 11:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0L + Ratio + Send + Sync + Sized + Unpin
08.11.2025 17:10 โ ๐ 106 ๐ 19 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0I think this might be the author half-remembering something about the Heisenberg-Schroedinger rivalry, where the elegance of waves vs the (at the time) unfamiliar-to-most-physicists clunkiness of linalg was a point of contention
08.11.2025 09:20 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Recommend this if you haven't read it: www.penguin.co.uk/books/294612...
10.10.2025 08:31 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0To be honest I just assume these things are fiction or a joke.
04.09.2025 20:46 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Evan gave an interview last year where he was pretty vague but suggested he had been working on extending Elm to the backend: youtu.be/0SUM4869ODc
19.08.2025 12:02 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Without his notes!
12.08.2025 21:28 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Including for Americans; it provided the preconditions for US dominance of the continent
05.08.2025 07:01 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Speed/cost of generating the reply. Google are achieving an absolutely astonishing feat here in getting it to work at all, with a terrible end result
03.08.2025 12:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Rod Humbleโs Stavka-OKH is essentially that, if youโve not come across it before: www.rodvik.com/rodgames/STA...
11.07.2025 21:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0