richard nixon twink lesbian

Good

i think a history of using ai and lying about it in her work is a pretty obvious sign that she's willing to do that here

thoughts from my aspiring author friend who isn't plugged into the situation and isn't very online

i think it's mostly ai slop and partially a work with some potentially good ideas at the base that isnt given the time or level headedness to make those points in a coherent way

i have 2 jobs and might get a third one tbh or like start donating blood

ffs in a year and i have $13k in the bank but i need more if i wanna be cunty and sexy and beautiful

so we've gone from fbi letter -> ai letter sent to the needle which was legit -> the needle fabricated the letter

still hasn't addressed the chatgpt in her book. still hasnt given a credible explanation for how chatgpt artifacts ended up in her substack. calls all her critics racists instead

what

She still hasn't answered why its not safe for her to post it. She hasn't given any answer to why there is an ai artifact in her book. She hasn't given a plausible explanation for the dworkin quote. Like if we're being racist and fucking her over then prove it girl dont just post at us

I agree with you on Jane. Tara is just extending that to ALL of her critics and using the real existence of transmisogynoir to deflect instead of actually defending herself with proof

I'm sure you have your issues, tara. I don't think anyone thinks you're a monster or anything. Why not either admit to this, release the letter, or log off? I don't understand how these clumsy responses where you call your critics white supremacists are helping you.

i dont understand why tara doesn't say "i'm going to make a response soon" and then log off for 2 weeks until this dies down. she's just making it worse, now she's saying the reporter is a white nationalist and all her critics are racists

i never claimed to be a Very Serious Person. i am a 20 year old trans woman with a pulse and an internet connection. the fact i discovered this first says more about the "transfeminist community" than it does about me. now do you have any evidence my assertion is wrong?

Even in the most charitable version of the story she's an awful writer who can't research or write properly, and is incredibly naive in thinking the fbi letter was real.

none of this makes any sense. if tara wants any chance of being credible she needs to release the letter, explain how the ai artifacts got in her writing, and explain how she thought the ai fbi letter was real. but she wont because there is no letter and there is no explanation for the ai writing

@katie.bzky.team

Her book reads like AI slop.

drive.google.com/file/d/1rlvd...

Publically available from her substack.

Here's something interesting. That last paragraph from p 11 of her book reads like an ai artifact, right?

I would basically agree with you. I'm just calling her a hypocrite.

tara called ai "the most evil technology ever produced"

🤔

My mistake for not being 100% cynical all of the time. Won't be repeated 🙄🙄 (god im kinda dumb)

Knight seems to understand that other trans women aren't going to go after her without proof as a black trans woman because of the implications. Breathtakingly cynical activity grom her

I did. There was a comment about it. She said it was something from google and I believed her because it didn't make sense to me that an anarchist transfeminist would do that. Joke's on me I guess

they called me a right wing sock puppet and blocked me 🙄

Ok

Very different typing style from your other comments. Interesting

bsky.app/profile/rose...

There's an account with 0 followers who only follows Knight and their first activity is aggressively defending her here. Not saying it's Knight for sure, but come on.

You have 0 followers now that I'm checking. So interesting

A lot of her stuff seems like it was written by AI. Lot of ideas with no concrete examples, "it's not x it's y". I first thought it was AI when I started reading her stuff but I wanted to be charitable.

Sure.

oh you only follow knight and bluesky. interesting!

heres a better question for u. why do u have no posts and your first ever activity was defending knight here. and u have like 3 followers/following. im glad ur so passionate about defending people you follow

I don't have any tech