Lester Nare's Avatar

Lester Nare

@lesternare.bsky.social

Humanist. Product Designer. Operative. Footballer. Co-Founder at Steadworth. Founder at UAP Caucus. Formerly Princeton.

1,363 Followers  |  19 Following  |  89 Posts  |  Joined: 10.11.2024  |  1.9985

Latest posts by lesternare.bsky.social on Bluesky


I’m not buddies with Jesse. I’m not apart the white nationalist technofacist cult you think he’s apart of.

I’m not in the SF/Austin/Thiel orbit.
I don’t care about these people and don’t want to be associated with anything to do with that nonsense.

Get over it.

22.05.2025 03:28 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I’m buddies with Jeremy. The only reason he was even there and there’s footage of this is because I personally know him well *and* the producers of his show and both invited them and advocated for them to be allowed in when no one else wanted there, but me.

Go ask him yourself.

22.05.2025 03:24 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Whatever nonsense conspiracy you’re trying to make an accusation about.

22.05.2025 03:19 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Keep reaching

22.05.2025 03:15 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I agree with you that the SCIF’s SSO would’ve had to sign off, what I’m saying is there has never even been a request made, so the SSO hasn’t had the opportunity to decline.

10.03.2025 18:27 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

All good, Nick. Thanks for taking the time to speak with me.

10.03.2025 17:09 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Nick, you’re publicly making character judgments about me, which has nothing to do with the sovereign wealth fund, without ever having actually talked to me, which I felt like you would’ve done based on our relationship, and you know I would be receptive.

I’m not the one disparaging you publicly.

10.03.2025 16:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Black people are not allowed into the cabal unless you’re a billionaire.

10.03.2025 16:05 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

All good notes, yes he both doesn’t need one for him to have gone in, meaning it was purely a lapse of committee actually doing the paperwork to make it happen.

Regarding status, I can only speak to the fact that it is currently active, which you could infer means he found a sponsor.

10.03.2025 16:04 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

I’m disappointed that you continue to say this stuff publicly and you’ve never called or even asked me about it, Nick.

10.03.2025 15:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Can you share what operating system/browser you are using, helpful note thank you

06.03.2025 04:30 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Video thumbnail

You can now listen to audio summaries of UAP research papers on UAP Caucus.

If you’ve struggled to find the time to read research papers, this can be a great alternative to get started.

It’s an experimental feature for now, but so far seems to be working pretty well.

www.uapcaucus.com/research

06.03.2025 03:28 — 👍 20    🔁 0    💬 4    📌 0

That is the intimation.

11.02.2025 22:42 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Fact don’t care about your feelings. Find someone else follow. I’m not here to be your hero. I’m here to do the work.

11.02.2025 22:40 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Whatever. I care about the safety of my family, which is being threatened by the hysterics of people reacting the way you did to me.

The safety of my family does not require justification for semantics.

11.02.2025 22:39 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

And just to be clear, me talking about it is not an explicit validation of any other political ideology or administration.

11.02.2025 22:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

and ignoring all of the other human rights related issues which I have publicly commented about and tweeted about and gone physically and fundraisers for an advocated against for a very long time.

11.02.2025 22:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The point of the original tweet was to highlight that this administration was never going to prioritize disclosure—and that this was obvious to anyone paying attention, and that I’m not naïve to that fact, I’m not trying to cozy up to the Trump administration, purely for the sake of disclosure…

11.02.2025 22:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I’m being repeatedly accused of being an enabler of a techno-fascist regime because I’m simply calling balls and strikes when I discuss UAP.

It has escalated to the point of physical violence, with my car being broken into over nonsense I have no control over.

11.02.2025 22:29 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I see you have terrible reading comprehension because nowhere did I say that I was the only one calling out techno fascist, I want people to stop destroying my property thinking that I believe otherwise.

Your inability to read is not my problem.

11.02.2025 22:27 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Oh yeah, I’m gonna come to bluesky for attention 😂😂😂

11.02.2025 22:22 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

You’re having an emotional reaction to something you don’t understand the context of, and instead of asking questions, you’re making it about your own ego. Nowhere did I say I’m ‘super smart’—that’s something you projected onto it.

11.02.2025 22:21 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

If you’ve been concerned about this for longer than 10 years, great—so maybe direct that energy at the people actually responsible instead of taking cheap shots at me.

11.02.2025 22:17 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yeah, I’m pissed off. Wouldn’t you be if you’d been harassed for months and had your car broken into because people decided to blame you for something you have no control over? But sure, let’s ignore all that and pretend the real issue here is me being ‘whiny.’

11.02.2025 22:17 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Quarterly reminder for the people in the back:

The time to be mobilized against a creeping techno-fascist state was a decade ago. I did the work. Y’all ignored it.

This is happening because of the conversations you didn’t have at your dinner tables—not mine.

You fix it.

06.02.2025 01:43 — 👍 28    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 0

🤝

22.01.2025 20:10 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I think when people talk about ‘disclosure,’ what they really mean is the eventual outcome—a slow accumulation of compounding events and developments that, over time, push us toward consensus.

That’s all.

22.01.2025 19:21 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Maybe I’m wrong. But modern society hasn’t proven capable of taking things at face value. The Pentagon already released UAP videos—people shrugged. October 7 happened in real-time—people deny it. If a mass-casualty event can’t unify perception, why would a tech demo?

22.01.2025 19:21 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Right—because a single event wouldn’t be enough. It would take sustained exposure and repeated demonstrations to build consensus. Which, again, was my point.

22.01.2025 19:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Sure, single events can be world-changing—but they don’t create universal agreement. 9/11 was the most documented attack in history, yet conspiracy theories about it persist.

October 7 happened in real-time, and people still argue over basic facts.

Disclosure won’t be different.

22.01.2025 18:43 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

@lesternare is following 17 prominent accounts