Max Kagan's Avatar

Max Kagan

@maxkagan.bsky.social

Postdoc at Columbia Business School studying partisan sorting at work. https://www.maxkagan.com/

312 Followers  |  1,202 Following  |  103 Posts  |  Joined: 02.06.2023  |  2.4315

Latest posts by maxkagan.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

πŸ“’ Thrilled to share our new article introducing CampaignViewβ€”a comprehensive open-source dataset of congressional candidate campaign bios and policy platforms (2018–2022). Paper + data here: campaignview.org & doi.org/10.7910/DVN/... 🧡1/4

10.07.2025 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 133    πŸ” 51    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

Wild times for those of us who study corporate sociopolitical activism

04.08.2025 16:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It looks like there is already a Stata MCP, for those who might want such a thing

12.07.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

For that matter, right now there are ~700k people per representative and GA has ~1.3m non-citizen residents, so MTG’s own state would likely lose at least one, maybe 2 reps?

30.06.2025 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Constitutional questions aside, it isn’t clear to me what the net partisan electoral effect would be? CA and NY would presumably lose representatives (and thus electors), but so would FL and TX?

30.06.2025 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Much of my recent research has been thinking critically about whether it is always reasonable to use public campaign finance records as a good way to understand corporate executives' political ideology. So it is pretty striking to see someone "saying the quiet part out loud!"

26.06.2025 00:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the political literature this is known as donating for access. It’s very common. Campaign donations should be interpreted as strategic manifestations of political goals, not expressions of true preference.

25.06.2025 23:44 β€” πŸ‘ 314    πŸ” 65    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 5
Post image

πŸ™ƒ

26.06.2025 00:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.

Going to #AOM2025 and working on #nonmarket strategy or know someone who is? Join our PDW on Research Frontiers in Nonmarket Strategy β€” now in its 8th year!

πŸ—“οΈ Sat, July 26 | 11:00AM–1:30PM
πŸ“ Bella Center, Auditorium 12
πŸ“ Pre-register by ***July 1***: umdsurvey.umd.edu/jfe/form/SV_...

23.06.2025 16:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Measuring and ModelingΒ Neighborhoods Measuring and Modeling Neighborhoods By Cory McCartan, New York University, Jacob R. Brown, Boston University and Kosuke Imai, Harvard University Granular geographic data present new opportunities to understand how neighborhoods are formed, and how they influence politics. At the same time, the inherent subjectivity of neighborhoods creates methodological challenges in measuring and modeling them. We develop an open-source survey instrument that allows respondents to draw their neighborhoods on a map.

Measuring and ModelingΒ Neighborhoods

Measuring and Modeling Neighborhoods By Cory McCartan, New York University, Jacob R. Brown, Boston University and Kosuke Imai, Harvard University Granular geographic data present new opportunities to understand how neighborhoods are formed, and how they…

12.06.2025 14:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“„ @fgilardi.bsky.social created this template for writing abstracts several years ago, and I’ve tried to follow Fabrizioβ€˜s suggestions ever since.

PDF: fabriziogilardi.org/resources/pa...

05.06.2025 13:46 β€” πŸ‘ 98    πŸ” 35    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
Not all Trump voters "voted for this" Trump’s policy agenda is very unpopular, including with many of his supporters. To win the next election, Democrats need to welcome regretful Trump voters back onto their side

Americans who report paying β€œa lot of attention” to news (everyone on this platform) are (a) in the minority of voters and (b) very, very prone to assuming the other side of the aisle is all extremists. This is counterproductive to broader party efforts at persuasion. I have sources:

🧡

02.06.2025 13:40 β€” πŸ‘ 182    πŸ” 59    πŸ’¬ 25    πŸ“Œ 13

Most people consume less than 1 hour of news per day (Pew). The result of this is that they are simply not or are ill/mis-informed, and do not have hard preferences on policy or parties. About 15-20% of voters can correctly identify positions as belonging to the left or right (Kinder and Kalmoe, 17)

02.06.2025 13:40 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

I don’t know the authors at all, but I do wonder if having an American (or US-based) author with more familiarity with the local context might have helped to raise this? Of course it’s probably far more common for the shoe to be on the other foot with US researchers unfamiliar with local context

15.05.2025 18:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seems like a job for @johnholbein1.bsky.social himself!

15.05.2025 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Some of us have been saying this for years.

15.05.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I could imagine one using the same draft design and looking at something like church attendance records over time (e.g., from the LDS member rolls) rather than the headstones only

15.05.2025 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Could be a good mechanism test, but then you're back to dealing with selection problem of enlistment... and it seems highly likely that people who voluntarily enlist would be more religious to begin with

15.05.2025 16:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

From VA Form 40-1330, available here:

www.cem.va.gov/hmm/#:~:text...

The religious marker is optional but available at no additional charge.

One simple check: it seems like military headstones must include service details (i.e., branch, rank). Presumably one could exclude these.

15.05.2025 15:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember when this was posted on the other site, my concern was that veterans can get free tombstones (with a free religious icon), whereas non-veterans’ families would have to pay more to include a religious icon.

15.05.2025 15:06 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You can read the column for free?

13.05.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

After years of doubt, drafts, and disbelief, my firstβ€”and likely lastβ€”book is finally out. It’s about how entertainment shapes American politics. If you preorder (a.co/d/ctGUWkZ), I’d love to send a small token of thanks: forms.gle/1YrkYX2t2nPC...

08.04.2025 19:04 β€” πŸ‘ 373    πŸ” 67    πŸ’¬ 35    πŸ“Œ 13

I actually think this could be an area where public research is good and useful? Presumably firms have an incentive to figure this out on their own privately, but if you publish on this, then society knows what to watch out for and can make the case for investments in regulatory enforcement

08.04.2025 23:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

political science is actually pretty good on this front relative to a lot of other disciplines!

08.04.2025 20:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't claim any unique philosophical insight (other than that Weber's "Science as a Vocation" remains a great read 100 years on), but one specific study to which you allude involves analysis of public data which are already out there for anyone with the time and inclination.

08.04.2025 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

... and as you note, we don't/can't cover people who aren't registered to vote, which includes noncitizens, felons, etc. Our view is that while there are important limitations to bear in mind, this method is still leaps & bounds ahead of just using campaign donors to look at overall employees

06.04.2025 19:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Partisan segregation in the U.S. workplace is large and rising Political segregation in the United States is increasing across geographic and social domains. Using a novel dataset created by matching employment histories wi

Hi @awmercer.bsky.social, these are definitely important things to consider. In an earlier paper, we do some benchmarking which suggests there isn't huge skew in terms of LinkedIn coverage vs. the overall labor market on observable dimensions, including partisanship

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

06.04.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Wow!

Three scholars at Columbia, Michigan, & Maryland just introduced a measure of the partisan leanings of employers in the U.S.

The data is constructed by linking voter registrations to online worker profiles.

VRscores capture the political affiliations of 21.8M workers across 2.6M employers.

06.04.2025 15:25 β€” πŸ‘ 268    πŸ” 74    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 11
Post image

He was trying to summarize the recent DiD literature.

02.04.2025 16:50 β€” πŸ‘ 60    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Hiring Visit the post for more.

I am looking for a post-bac (Dartmouth language for a pre-doc) researcher to join our team studying elections and democracy. If you (or someone you know) have expertise in data science or political science, please apply or share this opportunity!

polarizationresearchlab.org/hiring/

31.03.2025 23:28 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@maxkagan is following 20 prominent accounts