Slightly heated exchange in the British colonial officers club this morning.
25.11.2025 08:49 — 👍 27 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0@gloefflmann.bsky.social
Lecturer (Assistant Prof) in US Foreign Policy, Queen Mary University of London. Out now: The Politics of Antagonism (Routledge, 2024). Researches Security/Narratives/Identity/Populism https://www.qmul.ac.uk/politics/staff/profiles/loefflmanngeorg.html
Slightly heated exchange in the British colonial officers club this morning.
25.11.2025 08:49 — 👍 27 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Große Dinge werfen ihre Schatten voraus. #SundayRoast
23.11.2025 17:31 — 👍 24 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0of NATO as we know it. If Washington can negotiate away the national security interests of a sovereign, independent country in order to accommodate rapprochement with Moscow, who can take seriously US security guarantees to Poland, Romania or the Baltic States, ultimately aimed at deterring Russia?
21.11.2025 23:07 — 👍 26 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0to future Russian aggression and renewed invasion, but Washington under Trump clearly signals that it is ultimately not the arbiter of strategic deterrence of Russia. This job will now fall squarely on the shoulders of the Europeans. With his ‘peace plan’ Trump may very well have spelled the end /4
21.11.2025 23:07 — 👍 18 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0letting Russia keep territorial gains it has made. More shocking, however, is how Trump essentially negotiates away a key European security interest without any input by European NATO members. This has implications far beyond Ukraine. Not only is a neutral Ukraine forever vulnerable to /3
21.11.2025 23:07 — 👍 17 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0under Biden got enough military support to remain it’s sovereign independence and keep the war going, but not enough to win. Under Trump, the strategic priority has shifted to normalisation of diplomatic relations and the renewal of commercial ties with Russia. A negotiated outcome would mean /2
21.11.2025 23:07 — 👍 16 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Given the military, economic and demographic balance of power between Ukraine and Russia, a Ukrainian military victory that would evicts Russia from all occupied territories (if at all possible) would require massive US military support, including long-range fires, air power, etc. Instead Ukraine /1
21.11.2025 23:07 — 👍 26 🔁 7 💬 2 📌 0Wie ich eure Skeets lese:
21.11.2025 22:02 — 👍 20 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Die Tristesse der Bourgeoise.
21.11.2025 21:48 — 👍 17 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Das war’s dann auch mit meiner Produktivität für 2025. 🤣
21.11.2025 10:20 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ja, heute auch im Black Friday Sale erstanden. 😁
21.11.2025 10:18 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I blame Black Friday!
21.11.2025 10:11 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Economist cover showing a panda bear crushing a VW beetle
Our cover this week.
economist.com/briefing/202...
& ALLIES
20.11.2025 15:25 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Die Übung vom Wachbattalion hat echt eingeschlagen…
19.11.2025 20:05 — 👍 76 🔁 4 💬 8 📌 1The pot calling the kettle black.
19.11.2025 17:29 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hab versehentlich Operation Walküre ausgelöst, uppsi.
19.11.2025 17:28 — 👍 20 🔁 0 💬 4 📌 0Merz über Brasilien: ‘Ich sag wie’s ist, woanders ist auch scheisse.’
19.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 13 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0It was always garbage. Sincerely, Europe.
19.11.2025 13:06 — 👍 21 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0Mein Doktorand zitiert @frankstengel.com. Was noch 2025, was noch?!?
19.11.2025 12:51 — 👍 23 🔁 0 💬 5 📌 1The Peacemaker soundtrack is one of the best things to happen to this bleak world in recent times, just pure unadulterated hair metal joy! 🎸🤘
18.11.2025 14:24 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The CGD book launches just keep coming! Please, join us this Thursday for a presentation by co-authors @stijntvankessel.bsky.social (QMUL) and Daniele Albertazzi (University of Surrey), as well as for comments by Cora Lacatus, Q&A with the audience, and a small drinks reception afterwards.
18.11.2025 13:32 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Was the Führer looking to compensate, you reckon?
18.11.2025 12:02 — 👍 12 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1Since coming here in 2011, this EU citizen has paid student fees, rent, utility bills, purchased goods and services, paid income tax, VAT, and national insurance, and hasn’t received a single penny in aid from the UK government, just to throw it out there.
18.11.2025 09:13 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ich sage wir stehen 2029 bei 189.678! 💪
18.11.2025 09:07 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Pistorius macht sich hier einen sehr schlanken Fuß, er wollte eigentlich keine verpflichtenden Ziele zusagen, also legt er die Messlatte für die nächsten vier Jahre jetzt so niedrig, dass es gerade noch akzeptabel ist, und er praktisch jeden Anstieg als politischen Erfolg im BT verkaufen kann.
18.11.2025 08:28 — 👍 18 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 1Bis 2029 fast tausend Stellen weniger, als dies vor zwei Jahren noch fuer 2027 galt (198.00 Aktive vs 198.800 einst). Aber dann in 2035 270.000 Aktive. Genau mein Humor. Solche Statements sollten bei Pressekonferenzen in Grund und Boden gelacht werden.
www.faz.net/aktuell/poli...