M̷̬͆ã̶̢͝ḏ̸͗_̷̫̎S̵̻̐ç̵̼̍ï̸̩͒ë̶̠̑n̶̰̿t̷̞̐î̶̘͛s̴̬̾ț̷͝ṵ̴̍

Screenshot of a post with instructions on how to make Powerwash style dish soap....

I'll be damned, it worked....
Just made some and washed the coffee pot and cups....
Since it's not specific about which alcohol, I used isopropyl, and Wally World brand detergent....
This'll save hundreds of dollars over time....

Did they free the Palestinian activists that they arrested?

If you want to know how politicians think, in contrast to actual people, just read Will’s posts.

L-MAO

lol.

LMAO even

Not a majority, but still a lot

AFAIK, you can't just "kinda vote" for someone.

Asking all the normies out there:

Do business owners need to adhere to professionalism, or is that just for their employees?

I'm not asking this to distinguish class, I genuinely want to know.

Okay, so if I concede to your points, what would that look like?

"You're right, we should be prioritizing supporting the democrats in order to restore USAID."

That's just option 1 in my post.

It's not a company, lol.

Where I am, root vegetables are cheap and readily available above more perishable vegetables, especially when you go by $/calorie. So, for me, it's the obvious choice.

And I don't really plan, I just go when I'm out of food and buy what's cheap.

On the bright side, a lot of Jews are trying to distance themselves from zionism.

bsky.app/profile/synr...

The only viable options for progress in America are options 2 or 3.

As I have said in a post long ago, there must necessarily be a period where conservatives will be in charge.

But if they are in charge for too long, then we can only rely on option 4.

3. New Party / Third Party - Will also put pressure to reform democrats to adopt more progressive policies.

This will also lead to a period of power where conservatives will be in charge. However, a third party will put more pressure on the democratic party.

Results will be the same as 2.

2. Reform the Democrats - Withhold vote until Dems reform, will result in revocation of rights until Dems adopt more progressive policies.

This will lead to a period of power where conservatives will be in charge. But this will eventually lead to a progressive party which will restore rights.

Re: US electorialism, we have three options:

1. Vote Democrats - Will result in a slower decline away from progressivism, and rights will be taken away eventually.

This will lead to 2. or 3., as conditions become more and more intolerable.

Things will not improve if you keep voting for dems.

By framing the situation as the polemic between democrats and republicans, as between a slow decline and a rapid decline, you are directly impeding progress for yourselves.

If you care about the future at all, you need to criticize yourself before you criticize others.

I think we need to help them develop their own economy independent of American interests, and you can't do that if their people are dying.

But you also can't do that if the democrats are in power either.

You need to read what I'm writing.

Neither party proposes a solution for these countries to regain economic sovereignty. In that aspect, both parties are the same. Every action they take is in the interests of the American Bourgeois.

worldcrunch.com/eyes-on-the-...

medium.com/the-politica...

theafricaagenda.com/usaids-role-...

tribune.com.pk/story/252739...

orinocotribune.com/usaid-the-hu...

znetwork.org/znetarticle/...

If you don't think it's imperialism, you're the outlier.

4/10.

Need more carbs. Potatoes, carrots, root vegs in general.

Also no aromatics. No garlic, onions, ginger, basil, thyme, cilantro, hot peppers, etc. Your food will have no flavour.

Ditch the fruit cups. That's just sugar.

Social welfare programs are a means for redistributing accumulated capital through capitalism, as concessions made.

USAID is not a means for redistributing accumulated capital through imperialist exploitation, but rather to guarantee compliance to imperialism.

This is hilarious because that implies Hamas is zionist.

And the leadership in those countries is dependent on maintaining USAID.

It's not a economics move, it's a geopolitical move.

Climate change will disproportionately disrupt agriculture in China and the EU.

bsky.app/profile/synr...

They can't and they know they can't. That's why they're trying to get their proxies to do it.

USAID is bad, but to directly cut it is destructive. (obviously)

However, no party is going to be developing a plan to have these recipients become independent from USAID.

In that aspect, no party really cares about the right to sovereignty for the people in these countries.

Early 1800’s England lets gooo!!!!

www.instagram.com/reel/DM8KcTM...