Interesting! I have no idea, but I think mine do work more or less that way.
17.10.2025 20:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@antiquethought.bsky.social
Ancient Historian/Classicist. IT/Cognition/Law. | Fellow @GuggFellows.bsky.social and American Academy in Rome | Never, ever speak for my employer | Also cooking @foodoriented.bsky.social
Interesting! I have no idea, but I think mine do work more or less that way.
17.10.2025 20:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0β
15.10.2025 21:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My on-going thanks to an anonymous donor in memory of Lucy Shoe Meritt.
14.10.2025 18:19 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Christmas came before Halloween!
14.10.2025 17:42 β π 21 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0This fellowship changed the trajectory of my career and my time on its committees is the most worthwhile professional service I have ever done. Please apply and help us spread the word
14.10.2025 12:41 β π 27 π 15 π¬ 1 π 0I hadn't realized Daniel Kahneman had dedicated his final years to cooking.
12.10.2025 14:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0!!Qui volet!!
12.10.2025 00:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is very interesting to me from a differences-between-disciplines point of view. I can't imagine these numbers (either the y-axis or the # of data points) in language or historical fields. And I would have guessed (wrongly) that she is a hard scientist.
11.10.2025 21:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ready to delete account.
11.10.2025 16:43 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I was there during roughly peak Celtics, and I don't know that the fanbase had a really distinctive character.
I do wonder if there isn't lurking proto-entitlement in the general feature of Boston culture of imagining the city to be more important to the country than anyone else thinks of it?
I generally don't either, and certainly no one owes that labor, but I will confess that I've benefited from following social media discussions of topics that are not precisely in my areas of research and with whose protagonists I'll likely never have an occasion for that coffee.
10.10.2025 14:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, I think so.
08.10.2025 15:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Part of the issue here is some ambiguity in βtop-downβ? There is one conventional usage that refers to individuals along a vertical scale of power (or whatever). The other is a scale of abstraction/generality, in which ANY individual is at the bottom.
08.10.2025 15:43 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0True and important.
08.10.2025 15:24 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Please tell me this is true, @carlosfnorena.bsky.social !
04.10.2025 20:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The potential Mexican cross-over here intrigues me.
04.10.2025 12:12 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Strigine gender theory?
03.10.2025 22:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I eat ants and I eat yoghurt, so in principle yes.
03.10.2025 19:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I was still using this technology for research more recently than that!
02.10.2025 00:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ok. If someone had three nights in Dublin and had never been to Ireland, what neighborhood should they book for accommodation?! RTs welcome.
01.10.2025 22:45 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 5 π 0See also the work of the late Jean-Baptiste Piggin on the origins of this form of diagram:
www.piggin.net/index.htm
Partial counterpoint: I don't actually know the politics of the bulk of my colleagues in the field.
26.09.2025 23:59 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think that for me (a) there is no systematic difference, but (b) to the extent that I occasionally imagine one, "discipline" is more institutional and "field" more conceptual.
26.09.2025 14:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do it, Carlos. You know she's right.
25.09.2025 15:03 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Pre-photographic-slide era cast collection, it looks like.
25.09.2025 11:42 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Is this for Alan, @turhansbeycompany.bsky.social ?
25.09.2025 02:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And a fine choice it was!
25.09.2025 02:16 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Agreed.
24.09.2025 20:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Come work with me at the University of Arizona!
www.classicalstudies.org/placement-se...