Simply referring to each and every Muslim as "an Islamist" is deeply racist behaviour.

The article is about UK politics. I'm sure I'm not the only Brit who gets annoyed with Americans who try to make every single conversation about themselves.

Fair play. In gratitude, Denmark should do the same, and send a hospital boat to the US to provide free basic health care for the poor. And everyone treated gets a leaflet explaining how health care is free for everyone in Denmark.

No, we won't be. States get to vote and are represented in Congress. We'll join the likes of Puerto Rico and Guam as territories.

Actually, he started with the camps. The camps came in March 1933, only 2 months after Hitler first became Chancellor.

However, they didn't initially hold Jews. The first inmates were leftists - communists and trade unionists.

We should get rid of these foreign middle eastern religions invading our shores.

Back to Druidry it is.

Given Israel frequently attacks many of its neighbours sometimes with little or no provocation, and its leaders openly talk about a massively expanded "Greater Israel", claims that "we want peace" seem incredibly disingenuous.

Can someone explain to me why, if, according to the bible, the flood was somewhere between, 4300 and 4500 years ago, there is a tree in California that is over 5000 years old?

Apparently only some controversial things can be discussed (e.g. Palestine Action and placards), but other controversial things cannot.

The problem isn't controversy, it's truths they want to suppress.

It's ridiculous. It is the job of political journalists to discuss controversy, not avoid it. Otherwise, they are being negligent in their reporting.

Human rights should convey a knowledge of what is a violation and what is not. It should also inform him as to the penalties possible for failing to comply with human rights laws.

At least 12 Palestinians were killed and others injured in Israeli airstrikes across the Gaza Strip on Sunday, in a fresh violation of the Oct. 10 ceasefire agreement, the Civil Defense said.

It's ridiculous that with so much evidence around Epstein, so few of his co-conspirators have faced charges. This can only happen if the FBI is complicit in a cover-up.

There must be an independent external investigation.

Good job the protestors aren't doing that then. You sound like just one more right-wing liar. Or a bot. Hard to tell the difference.

Other groups who have objected to phrases don't have a long history of trying to use fake victimhood to shut down debate.

Also, victim cards don't work so well when used by those who actively support an ongoing genocide.

He's not a useful idiot. He knows exactly what he's doing. He's a paid propagandist.

Neither of them described the signs. That's understandable. According to UK law, if either of them repeated the statement on the signs, they could potentially be interpreted as supporting the message, which would, legally, make them terrorism supporters.

Ridiculous, I know, but that's where we are.

Non-stop lies. His entire world view is delusional.

However, what is unrealistic is uncritically viewing the US as an ally when it has repeatedly threatened other allies, sought to undermine their sovereignty, and has officially announced that it wants to support far-right politics in Europe.

UK should consider expelling US forces from British bases, says Zack Polanski Exclusive: Green party leader advocates leaving Nato and says Britain should wean itself off its reliance on the US

To be honest, the attack has some basis in reality.

www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

That's kind of by design. They are competing for the votes of ignorant people.

They don't care about being right. Or making sense. They are simply going for the same sort of vibe politics as other right wing parties.

I apologise if I was mistaken. However, if you are British, then it is a little odd that you would divert from a discussion of a British PM to talk about American education levels.

Why are you trying to judge a British Prime Minister according to "the default setting" for US citizens? That's a completely inappropriate metric and are you aware that it's incredibly annoying for others when Americans try to change every discussion anywhere about anything to be about themselves?

You put words in my mouth. I am not calling Starmer a Nazi. I am, however, saying that banality and evil often go together, and using Arendt's study of Nazis to illustrate my point.

And yes - I view being actively complicit in genocide as evil.

A horse with a red rosette could have won in 2024. Now the UK public have seen who he really is, he's massively unpopular.

In office a year and a half. Supported genocide. Scrapping trial by Jury. National ID. Stealing jewellery from refugees. Massively unpopular. Will likely herald a Reform win and breakup of the Union.

History will remember him as exactly that bad.

"Rather dull man who has made mistakes". A good description of many Nazis executed at Numerburg. Hannah Arendt coined a phrase to describe such people: "The banality of evil". Those who follow procedure to the letter, whilst lacking humanity, imagination and conscience.

Are they actually disgusted by left-wing people, or by the caricature version of left-wing people that the establishment creates in order to undermine their opponents?

Sowing division is one of the primary goals of right-wing media.

A conjecture: Every prominent politician, celebrity and influencer has an AI shadow sitting on a US government web-site, programmed as a mimic based on their past writings and videos. These shadows are used to predict and manipulate behaviour.

If not now, then tomorrow.

What a load of bollocks. Claiming that Rayner would be illegitimate because she is not acceptable "to the country as a whole".

Have they not looked at polls? Starmer isn't acceptable. Streeting isn't acceptable. The inability of Rayner to appeal to a mythical middle ground is irrelevant.