connie

(though "my" mind already presumes too much")

though my susceptibility to idealism may make it harder for me to understand idealism vs materialism. in the end i can't talk about either. i don't know how to distinguish the world from my body from my mind in such a way that makes material things and ideas anything but synonymous

normally i would resort to describing some idea asa social relation in a particular community (this can explain math being material, as built with socially enforced rules of deduction), but i don't quite see what relation idealism could be

hmmm. could idealism be material

believing in your own existence is for chumps. more like cogito ergo dumb

i had a friend who was obsessed with afhv. i'd go over and we'd watch it. i distinctly remember an episode of trees falling on cars that 8yo me thought was hilarious

fine fair enough. nonetheless if legible this would allow the desired behavior, so nothing really changes downstream in my argument

(i.e. the purely speculative character of this identity renders it somewhat meaningless)

there would be no issue, and this exact identification would be very useful, even for those like you.
it's just tranny Spinoza again

i don't think it's a waste of time. i think it's necessary at some point. but i think people move past it, and they either move past it by deciding, as you did, or by turning their attention elsewhere, as i did. and i think we've reached familiar ground: if "questioning" were culturally legible

action. dropping description in order to act is liberatory, and is what i see the critiqued post as making possible

pleased everything fit into place. i think when i started out no description of myself would suffice because that sort of description is impossible for someone who doesn't exist yet (if you insist on my present existence, which i would find suspect). a description of action is possible, but requires

my self-labeling. now that labeling is now important to me, but it only became important once i lived it. i started meek and allowed myself to be misgendered, and all that time sought for a concrete identity to finally "fix" and require language around. but when i stopped doing that and acted how i

and our experiences may diverge here, but i only accepted myself as a woman and a lesbian once i was in a place where what i thought i was didn't matter, and how i acted did. in that place i was not repressed and could act how i liked and i could only get there by accepting the insignificance of

demanding the right to label oneself is important as these labels do have downstream effects, but i don't think this is the same as the girl who lets herself be misgendered. it seems to express an exhaustion with empty self-discovery in the form of classes and types.

you're reaching and pushing past our conventional notion of femininity i suppose

a: this is redundant because every label is already the "i'm just not going to worry about explaining the rest of it" label, and
b: this is not bad, because as soon as you get metaphysical queerness out of the way you can start examining how you'll practically live as queer, which more interesting

saw a sign that said "someone who governs by force is a dictator" and like yeah sure but have y'all really thought about that at all

i think about Gödel's loophole a lot because that's not at all hope law works

"entweder" is an upsetting word. why is it constructed like that

though the real first one would be something Ghibli. i was raised on those though so they feel like a very different group — there was a first time i watched anime and knew it, as a kid they were just movies

i'm picky so it took a while to watch anything

(thanks for the clarity)

you always cut through the densest moralistic haze so quickly and simply

violence is awesome and epic

i've never seen someone faster to pull rank with identity. every single time

you're insane

i love bluesky. i'm on a few lists because of my follows and am blocked by people who don't block the accounts i follow. so many people here transparently enjoy being upset

liberation of homosexuality would require an actual indifference which can only come with the destruction of patriarchy.

the liberation of women requires the abolition of maleness, heterosexuality, and cisness; the future is for gay trans women