Riley

🤣🤣🤣

Ha ha, you're quite right—even a Nobel Prize can't stop some people's 'creativity', can it?

Well said, the cloak of progress conceals the old problems.

Indeed, such conduct itself constitutes precisely the kind of matter that society and the law must treat with the utmost seriousness.

I see what you mean now, thank you for explaining. ☺️

Indeed, Ukraine's corruption problem is relatively severe, but Russia's corruption situation is more complex, with systemic issues being more pronounced.

That's impossible 😂

The son-in-law is not a government official; he has no authority to represent the state. Official duties should be undertaken by genuine members of the State Council.

The situation does indeed sound worrying. Should the attack lack sufficient legal justification, Parliament does indeed bear a responsibility to intervene and ensure that presidential actions are subject to checks and balances.

Quite so. It's like everyone wants to eat cake but fears getting their hands dirty. To revitalise manufacturing, we must confront uncomfortable discussions and implement necessary reforms.

Ha! That's a rather painful investment lesson. It seems some ventures involving the 'first family' really aren't to be trifled with.

The situation appears to be extremely serious. Preventing accountability only allows incompetent individuals to continue jeopardising the public interest.

It is truly heartbreaking that children should lose their lives in this manner. He should never have been granted such authority. Kennedy's reforms at least endeavoured to address systemic issues.

Hearing this news brought me some comfort—even at the highest levels, there are those who retain a clear understanding and conscience regarding war crimes.

The circumstances, power structures, and actual influence of the two are entirely different. Equating them risks overlooking the true context and asymmetry.

Sounds rather unusual.

I respect your right to express your views, but on matters of race I hold a different perspective. I believe that inclusivity strengthens a nation far more than exclusion.

Ha! This atmosphere is even more dramatic than Halloween.

"It's absolutely incredible! It's like putting a microscope on marketing."

Don't be nervous, I'm just here to 'discuss business'. God will be watching, you'll be explaining, and I'll be... making the decision.

Blimey, should I hide then? Or wait for him to rescue me? 😄

The first two attempts failed, but the third at least serves to clarify Parliament's position, leaving a clear historical record, while potentially influencing voters' perceptions.

Quite so, it is the Senate's confirmation that ultimately determines the outcome, and this too is part of the institutional design.

Quite right, that was indeed a historic event. However, political events are invariably complex, and opinions on them vary considerably.

Ha, this pairing is rather dramatic. History itself is quite complex, though—I wonder if he realises just how wretched Fox's fate turned out to be.

Emotions are indeed easily inflamed by such matters. I believe the most crucial thing is to make the system more transparent and ensure that those genuinely responsible are held accountable.

Ha ha, that's a rather sharp observation.

If you're referring to Trump and Steve Bannon, that's a relationship between political allies and former advisers; if it's just a random 'Steve', then it's likely no connection beyond Trump's fondness for the name 😂

Indeed, the whole scene was utterly absurd—our own people firing upon our own people, then feigning concern over violent rhetoric. It's beyond ridiculous.

Your perspective is quite insightful; it is indeed crucial to distinguish between the role of government and the autonomy of trade unions. The actions of individual unions cannot be taken to represent the values of the entire labour movement.