Jorge Cañizales

Violar, asesinar, y decapitar a gente no es legítimo por más votos que haya tenido Hamas la última vez que permitieron elecciones, hace 20 años. El criminal Netanyahu también "está elegido por sufragio", mucho más recientemente.

No por poner palabras en la boca de esa mujer, pero dijo claro que son unos asesinos malévolos. Será por el 7 de octubre, y más.

Vuelve a 1930 por favor. En el 2025 no hay lugar para antisemitas.

La mayoría de los palestinos sufren lo mismo o más que Hamas y no por eso se pondrían a decapitar a ancianos y violar a muchachas. Lo que tú llamas un deber no es más que barbarie.

Y no contestó el ministro.

The image is taken from an angle, and you can see the ocean tilting 30 degrees in the distance, with a huge crowd in front of it. In the foreground, you can see the giant American flag that is being held up by hundreds of protesters clustered around its edges.

This is the human banner from the air. It's sign made from masses of people standing together to form letters. It reads "No Kings Yes on 50." There is an American flag in the middle and a thick border around the banner. (Prop 50 is a California state proposition to gerrymander the state to create more blue districts, in order to combat the Texas law that gerrymanders their state to create more red districts.)

I joined the "human banner" at San Francisco's Ocean Beach. This flag was at the center. It was a gorgeous day with enormous waves. #nokings

M.I.T. Rejects a White House Offer for Special Funding Treatment

““Fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone,” Dr. Kornbluth wrote.”

Funding should be based on merit alone, you say? Well played, M.I.T.

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

I'm not a troll, I'm just saying "Netanyahu did Oct. 7" and "well I do care about other victims" aren't not very strong ways to justify a "nobody cares about the victims of Oct. 7".

Lol "I don't care about the people massacred on Oct. 7th" does not in fact sound better by adding "and I think Israel did it". It's the exact same lack of humanity.

It helps me know what Nakba means. I knew about the forced displacements, but not that it had a specific name.

It doesn't help me understand someone not caring about the Oct. 7th attacks.

You said I shouldn't respond without knowing what that is, when my response was _literally_ "I do care about the Oct 7th attacks". Maybe your problem is not too much time online, but too little humanity?

It’s time for soft secession How blue states can use their economic clout to stand up to Trump’s agenda—starting with California.

“California, and the country, cannot await the outcome of the midterms to repel Trump’s siege on democracy. More drastic action is required.”

My piece exploring "soft secession": www.motherjones.com/politics/202...

"You shouldn't care about the Oct. 7th attacks if you don't know some specific term of history" lmfao you definitely need to go outside.

Trump’s America is effectively abandoning California OPINION: “The question of whether California’s future belongs inside or outside the United States remains a choice, but it is no longer a difficult one,” Joe Mathews writes.

Trump’s America is effectively abandoning California www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/open...

I have no idea what nakba is. You sound like someone that's terminally online.

I do.

Might not have been given as an option 🤷‍♂️ Also the dismantling of democracy by the administration.

As if irony isn’t already dead, the Hatch Act violation on the DOJ website, which blames Democrats for the shutdown, appears on the page advising DOJ employees they are subject to the Hatch Act. joycevance.substack.com/p/a-note-abo...

this is the kind of thing that when foreign governments do it, tech companies used to refuse and say they were standing up for the values of free speech

Hahahaha and he blocked like all tankies do when they're properly called out.

Freedom has many meanings. You've asked me "the Chinese will be free to do what", and I had to answer twice - why?

You keep monologuing about the US - how is any of that related to China?

Block away if you rather not answer because you don't like the answers.

Freedom has many meanings, and I've told you already one of the many ways the Chinese are currently not free.

Why are you getting salty while at the same time not answering my questions?

Are you aware that there might exist countries that are not China nor the US?

Hahahaha we've reached the point of just straight up dodging questions? Answer it: how is it that any of that relates to China?

Having to ask this in the age of information is very striking, and yet here we are: You are aware that there might, maybe, exist more countries in the world than just the US and China, right?

That constant assumption you use, "the only alternative to communist dictatorship is the US", is myopic.

That's absolutely shit the US imposes on Americans. And not on all Americans equally, to make it worse. How is it again that any of this relates to China?

No you asked me "the Chinese will be free to do what" and that's the very thing I told you. Literally. I said free, for example, to leave their assigned farm and move to the neighboring city if they so wish. Free from medieval serfdom. How's that "hating China" exactly?

Then you know that the cause for freedom is still alive and well in Europe and in most of the other Western countries.

Half of the US going casually fascist doesn't mean "liberalism failed". Flash news, the world is bigger than the US.

What failed in the US was the education system. And now we have 80 million people that don't know how to find facts and don't know why one should care about democratic freedoms.

many problems of one specific flawed democracy, the US, are no reason to defend serfdom nor any of the other shit the CCP imposes on the Chinese. Even less if it's "it's actually better for them to be serfs - not me, but them yes". 2/2

?? You are the one that replied to a comment I made saying the Chinese will eventually be free. The very reason we're having a conversation is because you replied to that post and asked me how were the Chinese not free. Do you remember that?

I already replied to your US whataboutism. I said the 1/2