Moritz Kriegleder's Avatar

Moritz Kriegleder

@mokriegleder.bsky.social

msc in physics & cognitive science, active inference & enactivism, consciousness & neuroscience, maths & philosophy at @univie.ac.at my band: https://distrokid.com/hyperfollow/momoanddervoid/solar-die-zukunft

1,220 Followers  |  1,073 Following  |  177 Posts  |  Joined: 11.10.2023  |  2.1376

Latest posts by mokriegleder.bsky.social on Bluesky

πŸ‘€

01.10.2025 02:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

get yourself a supervisor who attends your concerts

30.09.2025 08:10 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

aww what an honor!

30.09.2025 08:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness in humans Our understanding of the neural basis of consciousness is mostly restricted to large-scale brain activity patterns as measured by methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magneto/electro-encephalography (M/EEG). In contrast, we lack even basic understanding of circuit-level mechanisms supporting consciousness – particularly in humans – despite the fundamental role that such mechanisms likely play in instantiating larger-scale brain activity patterns supporting conscious states and contents. Here, we review what progress has been made on circuit-level theories of consciousness (e.g., apical amplification theory, dendritic integration theory) and argue that such theories can be tested in humans using recently developed, state-of-the-art methods. Doing so will further facilitate translation of consciousness science into clinical settings and strengthen the bridge between circuit- and network-level theories of consciousness.

Online Now: Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness in humans

20.09.2025 19:03 β€” πŸ‘ 23    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

please elaborate on the role switch πŸ˜‚

12.09.2025 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Bluesky shows higher level of content originality in scholarly discourse, perhaps due to a higher proportion of academic users. X tends to favor simple retweets. This positions Bluesky as a richer environment for substantive science communication."πŸ§ͺ
True for our study www.nature.com/articles/s41...

04.09.2025 00:51 β€” πŸ‘ 282    πŸ” 86    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 2

after the mixed bag of talks at ASSC I can't wait to read a proper review of INTREPID!

03.09.2025 08:14 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I see your point, but it implicitly refers to all aspects being discussed in consciousness science atm (eg Butlin et al 2023)

02.09.2025 16:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

then please enlighten me why the sentence is wrong by definition

02.09.2025 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

you can't prove causality in a causally-closed universe

02.09.2025 09:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

thanks its what we philosophers call a strawman argument!

01.09.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Thanks for the great discussion on studies of consciousness during EPSA25 at @rug.nl! Had a blast in this gorgeous building and seeing all these diverse approaches to philosophy of science.

01.09.2025 09:47 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

anyone interested in a consciousness lunch discussion at EPSA25? I would like to organise a little get together for philosophers interested in phil of mind, phil of neuroscience, consciousness...

#neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence

20.08.2025 07:36 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

definitely agree that koch and the NCC people jumped on a highly productive trend in philosophy of that time. studies is more inclusive but i guess science gets more funding...

31.07.2025 11:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah thats how we used it in our map of consciousness science, but some philosophers & psychologists pointed out that they don't feel included

31.07.2025 11:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

i agree, but coming from physics I had the feeling a small subset of physicists is well aware of that lack (especially in quantum physics)

31.07.2025 11:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah I got that term from you actually!

30.07.2025 13:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

why do you prefer science?

30.07.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

looking at the recent ASSC and similar conferences I doubt that they can do without philosophy and the mind sciences

30.07.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

will use that from now on!

30.07.2025 13:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

do you have an idea why studies and not science?

30.07.2025 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Since its such a young field I am still not sure how to call it. Consciousness Science? Consciousness Studies? Consciousness Research? Neuroscience of Consciousness?
#neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence

29.07.2025 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research cultures - Nature Reviews Neuroscience As scientists, we want solid answers, but we also want to answer questions that matter. Yet, the brain’s complexity forces trade-offs between these desiderata, bringing about two distinct research app...

Finally published:
β€œTop-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research cultures”
www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Looking for ways to better understand different neuroscientific perspectives and enable productive collaborations

22.07.2025 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 96    πŸ” 34    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 5

amazing, i would love to discuss these ideas with you and your lab! will write you!

22.07.2025 09:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

thank you! If you want to I can send the slides, but if you are up for it we could also discuss our ideas together with niccolo

21.07.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

#neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence

21.07.2025 09:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
moritz kriegleder presenting a slide on the current state of consciousness science

moritz kriegleder presenting a slide on the current state of consciousness science

finally recovered from all the thought provoking discussions I had at @assc28.bsky.social! presented a meta analysis of the current state of consciousness science and why we should leave theory convergence behind (based on work with @mnoichl.bsky.social & @niccolonegro.bsky.social)

21.07.2025 09:07 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

DelbrΓΌck:

14.08.2023 01:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œOnce men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” - Dune

23.06.2025 12:33 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i doubt that my grandma knew anything about the psychological literature on ego depletion, but she intuitively understood that I will have a second piece of cake if she asked often enough

20.06.2025 12:04 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@mokriegleder is following 20 prominent accounts