Max T. Nix's Avatar

Max T. Nix

@ributionsfehler.bsky.social

Used to work in strategic communication, now researching crisis communication and disinformation || Da machste nix. (he/him)

231 Followers  |  1,772 Following  |  37 Posts  |  Joined: 23.11.2023  |  1.9952

Latest posts by ributionsfehler.bsky.social on Bluesky

lost in the catastrophe that is American politics right now is how terrible corporate governance has become. democratic backsliding touches private institutions too, and the people who run some of the biggest orgs in the world have quietly devolved them into regressive fiefdoms.

06.11.2025 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 24    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

I stayed on twitter longer than a lot of people, and thought the "nazi website" stuff was hyperbolic; there were a lot more international folks on there, and bluesky wasn't a replacement for that. And then at some point in the last year, it just stopped being hyperbolic. That site is vile.

06.11.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 119    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

* repeats for emphasis *

"Neither movement waited for courts to recognize their rights; they interpreted the Constitution for themselves"

or to paraphrase Justice Thurgood Marshall, do what's right and let the law catch up

05.11.2025 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 168    πŸ” 45    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
The PSF has withdrawn $1.5 million proposal to US government grant program In January 2025, the PSF submitted a proposal to the US government National Science Foundation under the Safety, Security, and Privacy of Open Source Ecosystems program to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and PyPI. It was the PSF’s first time applying for government funding, and navigating the intensive process was a steep learning curve for our small team to climb. Seth Larson, PSF Security Developer in Residence, serving as Principal Investigator (PI) with Loren Crary, PSF Deputy Executive Director, as co-PI, led the multi-round proposal writing process as well as the months-long vetting process. We invested our time and effort because we felt the PSF’s work is a strong fit for the program and that the benefit to the community if our proposal were accepted was considerable. We were honored when, after many months of work, our proposal was recommended for funding, particularly as only 36% of new NSF grant applicants are successful on their first attempt. We became concerned, however, when we were presented with the terms and conditions we would be required to agree to if we accepted the grant. These terms included affirming the statement that we β€œdo not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI, or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws.” This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, **but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole**. Further, violation of this term gave the NSF the right to β€œclaw back” previously approved and transferred funds. This would create a situation where money we’d already spent could be taken back, which would be an enormous, open-ended financial risk. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are core to the PSF’s values, as committed to in our mission statement: > _The mission of the Python Software Foundation is to promote, protect, and advance the Python programming language, and to support and facilitate the growth of**a diverse and international community** of Python programmers._ Given the value of the grant to the community and the PSF, we did our utmost to get clarity on the terms and to find a way to move forward in concert with our values. We consulted our NSF contacts and reviewed decisions made by other organizations in similar circumstances, particularly The Carpentries. In the end, however, the PSF simply can’t agree to a statement that we won’t operate any programs that β€œadvance or promote” diversity, equity, and inclusion, as it would be a betrayal of our mission and our community. We’re disappointed to have been put in the position where we had to make this decision, because we believe our proposed project would offer invaluable advances to the Python and greater open source community, protecting millions of PyPI users from attempted supply-chain attacks. The proposed project would create new tools for automated proactive review of all packages uploaded to PyPI, rather than the current process of reactive-only review. These novel tools would rely on capability analysis, designed based on a dataset of known malware. Beyond just protecting PyPI users, the outputs of this work could be transferable for all open source software package registries, such as NPM and Crates.io, improving security across multiple open source ecosystems. In addition to the security benefits, the grant funds would have made a big difference to the PSF’s budget. The PSF is a relatively small organization, operating with an annual budget of around $5 million per year, with a staff of just 14. $1.5 million over two years would have been quite a lot of money for us, and easily the largest grant we’d ever received. Ultimately, however, the value of the work and the size of the grant were not more important than practicing our values and retaining the freedom to support every part of our community. The PSF Board voted unanimously to withdraw our application. Giving up the NSF grant opportunityβ€”along with inflation, lower sponsorship, economic pressure in the tech sector, and global/local uncertainty and conflictβ€”means the PSF needs financial support now more than ever. We are incredibly grateful for any help you can offer. If you're already a PSF member or regular donor, you have our deep appreciation, and we urge you to share your story about why you support the PSF. Your stories make all the difference in spreading awareness about the mission and work of the PSF. How to support the PSF: * Become a Member: When you sign up as a Supporting Member of the PSF, you become a part of the PSF. You’re eligible to vote in PSF elections, using your voice to guide our future direction, and you help us sustain what we do with your annual support. * Donate: Your donation makes it possible to continue our work supporting Python and its community, year after year. * Sponsor: If your company uses Python and isn’t yet a sponsor, send them our sponsorship page or reach out to sponsors@python.org today. The PSF is ever grateful for our sponsors, past and current, and we do everything we can to make their sponsorships beneficial and rewarding.
27.10.2025 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 4
Preview
Welcome to Decoherence Media! We're an independent, journalist-founded nonprofit investigating authoritarian and anti-democratic movements using open-source and data-driven methods.

Welcome to Decoherence Media, an independent nonprofit founded by @jennefer.bsky.social and @tristanl.ee that investigates authoritarian and anti-democratic movements using open-source and data-driven methods.

27.10.2025 11:09 β€” πŸ‘ 204    πŸ” 102    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 11

There are many good science fiction novels. Not a single one that I have read delivers a happy vision of the future in which aged right-wing billionaires control the media.

26.10.2025 00:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3203    πŸ” 691    πŸ’¬ 68    πŸ“Œ 23

"You know, Bob, I think people really should learn about their ancestries in the context of world history and the impact of imperialism - but make it sound like a Jeopardy category"

25.10.2025 11:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Damn, that's cool!

(But oh boy, that fluff text needs a whole bag of asterisks... "reshaping identities through interaction and exchange"? That sure is one way to put it)

25.10.2025 11:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wenn man weltweit Entwicklungen vergleicht, in denen autokratische oder demokratische KrΓ€fte Aufwind erfahren, spielt das Bildungssystem immer eine wesentliche Rolle. Dabei gilt stets: Viele Ressourcen und hohe WertschΓ€tzung aller Akteur*innen im Bildungssystem dienen Demokratien, und andersherum.

20.10.2025 21:46 β€” πŸ‘ 79    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I have a note: Please don’t make AI slop versions of actual signs ppl made by hand.

19.10.2025 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3048    πŸ” 502    πŸ’¬ 34    πŸ“Œ 28

Oh boy it's really the linux year

16.10.2025 13:02 β€” πŸ‘ 244    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

plague doctor? no. blight attendant

15.10.2025 22:30 β€” πŸ‘ 75    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Really enjoyed & honoured to be part of the Critical AI Literacy Symposium yesterday. Also @lucyavraamidou.bsky.social & @miquelpt.bsky.social (and others) spoke about their wonderful work too. Big thanks to @irisvanrooij.bsky.social, Leo & Barbara for organising. ✨

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxyg...

14.10.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 4

Es ist alles falsch an diesem Statement und auch, dass Woidke die ganze Zeit nickt.
Wir haben Politiker*innen, die sind so alt, dass es ihnen einfach entgangen ist, in welchem Jahrhundert wir leben. Die ernsthaft glauben, die Welt von gestern, die, in der sie groß geworden sind, in der sie ihre 1/6

14.10.2025 22:42 β€” πŸ‘ 763    πŸ” 248    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 15
Preview
What to do in a chemical emergency

I haven't found relevant papers on this just yet, but I did come across this guideline by the UK government that also advises soaking up chemicals if you don't have enough water immediately at hand. So could you say it comes down to how much water you have available right after exposure?

14.10.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't know the first thing about chemistry or medicine, but depending on how long the skin has been exposed, that does sound like a major risk. I'll try and get in contact with the instructor and raise that issue with them, see what they have to say about it.

14.10.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I fully understand now that trying to soak up doesn't do shit for them πŸ˜… The only overlap - and why I was posing the question initially - was the question of oil-based pepper spray, which you pointed isn't particularly common after all.

14.10.2025 09:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If it makes any difference: They where referring to oil-based pepper spray and acid specifically as the most common incidents, not all chemical burns in general.

They have worked with several US institutions and hold a Ph.D. In chemistry afaik, so they were speaking with at least some authority.

14.10.2025 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Makes a lot of sense, thanks! Their logic was that it takes more water than is often immediately available to dilute the acid. 10 L to get 1L from pH 1 to 2, 10^6 L to get to pH 7. If you only have half a litre of water on you, you'll risk just spreading the acid instead. So we should soak it first.

14.10.2025 09:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, looks like you already have a subtitle for the next book

10.10.2025 12:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good to know, thank you!

10.10.2025 12:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Use only water or fresh air on tear gas or pepper spray.

No milk, vinegar, antacids, urine, etc. and especially not in eye.

Thank me later,

An actual expert

09.10.2025 20:06 β€” πŸ‘ 841    πŸ” 291    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 23

Their reasoning was that some pepper sprays are oil-based, so it seemed sensible?

(BTW, I don't know how many times you had to repeat this point, and always someone is giving you shit for it, but I appreciate that you're still putting yourself out there!)

10.10.2025 12:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I recently learned from a trainer for first responders that the best response to acid attacks would be to first soak up the liquid with cloth before washing it off/diluting it (so you need less water). They recommended the same for pepper spray. Just out of curiosity, what's your stance on it?

10.10.2025 12:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Es ist 2025 und ich benutze im Deutschlandfunk die Formulierung "Wahnwitzige Wurstentscheidung".
Keine Ahnung, alles ist mΓΆglich.

08.10.2025 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 858    πŸ” 71    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 3

fuck everything, we're doing tragedy and farce at the same time

03.10.2025 16:53 β€” πŸ‘ 337    πŸ” 32    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 4
Screen cap of parodic version of William Blake's "The Tyger" that begins:
Tyger! Tyger! Burning bright
(Not sure if I spelled that right) 
What immortal hand or eye
Could fashion such a stripy guy? 
What the hammer that hath hewn it 
Into such a chonky unit?
Did who made the lamb make thee, 
Or an external franchisee?

Screen cap of parodic version of William Blake's "The Tyger" that begins: Tyger! Tyger! Burning bright (Not sure if I spelled that right) What immortal hand or eye Could fashion such a stripy guy? What the hammer that hath hewn it Into such a chonky unit? Did who made the lamb make thee, Or an external franchisee?

In honor of National Poetry Day, the greatest parody rewrite of all time:

02.10.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 3731    πŸ” 1439    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 61
High Noon – Melanie Amann vs Ulf Poschardt
YouTube video by Reporterfabrik High Noon – Melanie Amann vs Ulf Poschardt

Ich mâchte dieses StreitgesprÀch zwischen Melanie Amann und Ulf Poschardt jedem empfehlen. Wie Amann Poschardts kalkulierte und platte Empârungs- und VerschwârungserzÀhlungen auseinandernimmt, so dass am Ende nur ein HÀufchen Elend übrigbleibt, ist großes Fernsehen.
youtu.be/QXH_QM7VHVk?...

04.10.2025 16:58 β€” πŸ‘ 865    πŸ” 233    πŸ’¬ 38    πŸ“Œ 4

@ributionsfehler is following 20 prominent accounts