Daphne Keller's Avatar

Daphne Keller

@daphnek.bsky.social

Director of Platform Regulation, Stanford Law School LST Program. Former Google (2004-2015) Legal Director for Web Search, Speech and Intermediary Liability Issues. May be cranky. https://law.stanford.edu/daphne-keller/

12,548 Followers  |  161 Following  |  3,869 Posts  |  Joined: 01.05.2023  |  2.5918

Latest posts by daphnek.bsky.social on Bluesky

Reading American history will break your heart a thousand times but it will also fill you with such admiration and awe for all the people who were excluded from the protection of America’s founding principles and fought to promote, protect and expand them anyways

16.02.2026 00:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3986    πŸ” 824    πŸ’¬ 38    πŸ“Œ 27

They’re only making plans for Nigel.

16.02.2026 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah right. It’s the Prime Minister of Antifa who has the power, I always forget.

16.02.2026 15:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah, the President of ANTIFA. I think he’s the guy from Portland who slept on my friends’ couch for a week in the 90s, and then everyone in the house got scabies.

16.02.2026 13:02 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

critical 🧡 on rubio’s speech at MSC

16.02.2026 11:19 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0
User Privacy vs. Platform Transparency: The Conflicts Are Real and We Need to Talk About Them Pretty much everyone wants better information about how platforms propagate and govern online speech. We are probably about to get it. A major pending EU law will require detailed public transparency ...

I have been yelling about this privacy vs transparency tradeoff for YEARS. But I'm at best a half-ass privacy expert. I was basically trying to hold space for when the real experts finally got invited or showed up in platform transparency discussions.

cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2022/04...

16.02.2026 10:22 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So so so happy to see privacy experts engaging in depth about tradeoffs between privacy and transparency -- in every context, but particularly under DSA Art. 40.

Preso on this was stellar.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

16.02.2026 10:18 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Nielsen data is for the US (I’m almost certain), and AFAIK is as reliable as data’s gonna get on the topic.

The TikTok data is from a doc produced in US litigation, but maybe it’s global? If so I’m guessing that outside the US it marks a much greater actual increase in screen time. 4/

16.02.2026 09:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I must object to that metaphor. Gibson = Clapton is making me a little ill.

16.02.2026 09:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

God bless The Smoking Gun

16.02.2026 09:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Jennifer
@JenYetAgain@beige.party
in 2017 a popular twitter game was to type a partial phrase then see what your phone auto-completes it with.
this proved so popular that it is now the only business model in the US.
Feb 9, 2026 at 4:35:18PM
Boosted by 968:
Favourited by 1324:

Jennifer @JenYetAgain@beige.party in 2017 a popular twitter game was to type a partial phrase then see what your phone auto-completes it with. this proved so popular that it is now the only business model in the US. Feb 9, 2026 at 4:35:18PM Boosted by 968: Favourited by 1324:

mom they’re roasting the US economy on mastodon again

16.02.2026 07:37 β€” πŸ‘ 10642    πŸ” 2437    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 28

My perspective may be skewed by the fact that the kid I talk to most about Internet use is *deeply* Bernadette-Banner-pilled.

As a young nerd at that age, I would have absolutely swooned at the idea of that kind of access to information. 3/

16.02.2026 09:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is TikTok worse than TV? The worst case scenarios are. The best case scenarios are way way better. I don’t know how to truly compare the two. But I’m from the nineties, and I’m here to tell you that the racism, sexism, body-shaming, and general suppression of difference on TV was WAY out of hand. 2/

16.02.2026 09:11 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
TV Viewing Among Kids at an Eight-Year High | NielsenTV Viewing Among Kids at an Eight-Year High | Nielsen Patricia McDonough, SVP Insights, Analysis and Policy, The Nielsen Company American children aged 2-11 are...

A presenter just mentioned internal TikTok data showing their 90th percentile child users watch 4.5 hours/day. (I think i got that right.)

Some quick searching tells me that’s how much time the average 2-11 yr old used to spend watching TV. 1/

www.nielsen.com/insights/200...

16.02.2026 09:07 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I guess I can’t swear. But all kinds of lockdowns (without any acquisition) are happening daily for AI goldrush reasons. And (off the top of my head) I’d think that adds to incentive to acquire the alternative source of the data trove you hold?

14.02.2026 04:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

VERY chuffed. Thank you!

14.02.2026 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The justices and gender pronouns Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. At issue was whether Idaho and West Virginia laws that prohibit transgender women […]

Interesting rundown of how S Ct justices have used gender pronouns in cases where that was an issue. I'm actually a little surprised and pleased by how generally respectful they've been in their use of he/she. It looks like "they" hasn't come up.

www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/the-...

13.02.2026 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

5/ Bottom line: The First Amendment would mean nothing at all if the FTC could use "consumer protection" as a talisman to regulate whatever it wants.

The agency should leave speech to the discretion of speakers, where it belongs, and stick to issues within its jurisdiction.

13.02.2026 01:05 β€” πŸ‘ 62    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well holy fucking shit. Ring cancelled their partnership with Flock. Keep pressure on them to stop volunteering their feeds to state, local, and federal agencies, though, because that part's still going.

13.02.2026 00:42 β€” πŸ‘ 7873    πŸ” 2822    πŸ’¬ 66    πŸ“Œ 46

empty and dragging?

13.02.2026 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

this is some bullshit

12.02.2026 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That makes it hard to argue (as X did) that sharing the data creates big problems for users’ GDPR rights, etc.

12.02.2026 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great summary of the EU Commission’s interpretation of researcher scraping rights in its DSA enforcement against X.

A major and unique backdrop here is that X (1) used to offer all this data to researchers in its API and (2) continues to offer it to anyone willing to pay.

12.02.2026 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Utterly foreseeable and deeply chilling. FTC hiring an attorney whose full time job will be to, as Chairman Ferguson put it in his leaked memo to Trump when he was trying to get the job, fight the β€œtrans agenda.”

12.02.2026 16:22 β€” πŸ‘ 99    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oh yeah!

12.02.2026 05:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

that’s a good way of putting it

12.02.2026 01:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I only know the litigators, so the rest is one big blind spot for me.

11.02.2026 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No, their remit has really expanded and they are focusing on a lot of current govt abuses. I thought the schools stuff was kind of silly, but their current docket/priorities/work are IMO very very smart.

11.02.2026 16:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, would that be the NRA v. Vullo for which current Under Secretary of State Sarah Rogers was NRA counsel in the lower courts??

I truly hope that a reporter asks her about this case in her current DSA-bashing our, where she keeps accusing EU officials of censoring speech by pressuring platforms.

11.02.2026 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You're always welcome, @lilianedwards.bsky.social

11.02.2026 16:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@daphnek is following 20 prominent accounts