β¦in the progressive policy world about the efficacy or desirability of big fiscal, given these political economy considerations. (2/2)
09.11.2025 11:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@gbatta.bsky.social
Economics and accounting professor @cmcnews. Faculty profile: https://www.cmc.edu/academic/faculty/profile/george-batta Personal site: https://www.georgebatta.com/
β¦in the progressive policy world about the efficacy or desirability of big fiscal, given these political economy considerations. (2/2)
09.11.2025 11:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So ultimately no damage to median real wages. But in your estimation, was the (likely) electoral backlash due to the timing of wage catchup, the distribution of real wage changes, or else just some kind of aggregate money illusion? Just genuinely curious whether the backlash changed priorsβ¦ (1/2)
09.11.2025 11:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Meta also doing an in-substance debt deal via a $30B leasing transaction in October.
08.11.2025 04:50 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Whenever she was in the news, back in pre-Musk Twitter, Isaac Chotiner usually would tweet about her role as the architect of Trump I's child separation policy. Dude loathes her with the white hot intensity of a thousand burning suns.
07.11.2025 06:00 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, I like this synthesis. I mean, I think even in a pre-social media world, there still would have been a strong backlash, but the effect was def amplified via social media.
07.11.2025 05:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Totally reasonable explanations too; I suppose I lean harder towards inflation as the story given voter survey evidence and some other empirical work Iβve seen. Hopefully, weβre all people of good faith trying to work with what limited data and flawed models we have π.
07.11.2025 05:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, I view it more as likely having had an important causal effect on incumbent vote share, though certainly not the only explanation for vote share. I suppose the experiment would be: how much higher would the ruling partyβs vote share have been, absent the inflation spike?
07.11.2025 05:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0β¦controlling for observables in a multivariate setting, etc.
07.11.2025 04:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0OK, the large N version: If we regressed incumbent vote share change on an inflation spike dummy, over a long period and for many countries, weβd see a negative coeff. estimate, ceteris paribus. ofc, the ceteris paribus is load-bearing, but now weβre both arguing post hoc narratives on unobservables
07.11.2025 04:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Oh I agree, I donβt like the implications of it at all; Iβd rather we aim for policies that aimed to boost, say, median real earnings. But I think thereβs a greater degree of money illusion operating here, which should give us all pause.
07.11.2025 04:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Went overboard with *all*, but there was def a broad anti-incumbency backlash. Hence, the chart:
07.11.2025 04:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Incumbent parties, the world over, who were in power during a price level jump without precedent in recent memory all took a shellacking at the polls. No one is arguing for some tight linear relationship between popularity and moderate inflation, just that incumbents were blamed for the sharp spike
07.11.2025 04:04 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 1Government's entire case falls apart when jury learns ranged subs attack with disadvantage within 5 feat.
04.11.2025 00:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah this is similar to take-or-pay or throughput arrangements in the energy industry, which can help finance construction off balance sheet. But leases are basically all on-BS nowadays, so not sure how this helps hide debt (eg, rating agencies regularly treat all lease commitments as debt capital).
31.10.2025 05:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I like how the NYT tried to do a βsome experts sayβ framing, and the expert was like, you do not need an expert opinion to see this is bad.
21.10.2025 18:56 β π 3332 π 933 π¬ 69 π 32I didn't take pics but the feeling of being in a group of people with no visible beginning or end was so thrilling. The opposite of online anomie, and a living counterpoint to the wary, isolated, compartmentalized world the shitheads want to make. It's simple and obvious I guess but it means a lot.
18.10.2025 22:05 β π 8433 π 1184 π¬ 71 π 27Sincerely appreciate the work youβre doing as a public intellectual, Justin.
19.09.2025 16:49 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0announcing my new think tank, the "people hate inflation, that's like 90% of why harris lost" institute
17.09.2025 14:43 β π 3129 π 358 π¬ 94 π 48Havenβt kept up with it, but there was a mini-boom in corp fin years ago for papers about family firms:
wgfa.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/u...
At first, I felt like I had freaking super powers. Like a PI with a nearly infinite supply of talented lab members, who worked at 1000x speed. It was exhilarating.
But then, the cracks started to show. TL;DR: If Claude were my grad student, I'd kick them out of my lab.
calling in the NIMBYs for one last job
17.08.2025 18:07 β π 852 π 271 π¬ 41 π 9Make your time.
26.07.2025 16:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Man, this or Fight Club would make for great UAPD eps. I donβt think you guys have entered the Fincherverse yet?
24.07.2025 02:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"...for Just One Day."
13.07.2025 19:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Read the transcript. This was a great interview! Learned a lot.
26.06.2025 18:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Right? Is there a 2025 Fight Club? Though I suppose fans of anarchist left-coded pop culture can easily horseshoe into MAGA extremism.
13.06.2025 03:25 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks much for the summary Carl, very helpful.
What do you think these results might tell us about the likely effectiveness of Agentic AI?
I mean, to the extent all insurance involves selling put options, then LL is just another flavor of insurance.
30.05.2025 05:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." -Carl Sagan
28.05.2025 19:52 β π 74 π 10 π¬ 2 π 0