Suspend him for what? Being accused? Afraid I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Ill condemn him if and when he is found guilty.
You can run kangaroo courts if you like but i ainβt playing
@tarquinhawk.bsky.social
Gooner
Suspend him for what? Being accused? Afraid I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Ill condemn him if and when he is found guilty.
You can run kangaroo courts if you like but i ainβt playing
βLeast they should have to do is explain why the supported his legal anonymityβ - How could they have done anything else. Learn the law
04.07.2025 20:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Because Arsenal naming him before being charged is illegal. Learn the law.
04.07.2025 17:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not abusive at all. But hey, youβre a hack so spinning/misrepresenting stuff is part of your job. See ya
27.01.2025 19:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you canβt see the hypocrisy, I canβt help you π€·ββοΈ
27.01.2025 19:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yet here you are, still replying. Its almost as if you are outrage farming for clicks. Unusual for a hack to do that.
27.01.2025 19:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why would i search your posting history before making that comment? Did you search mine?
27.01.2025 19:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do you reply to everyone who responds to one of your posts with an opinion you donβt like? Must keep you busy
27.01.2025 18:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Well, not sure anyone cares about your opinion on this soβ¦..
27.01.2025 18:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ah. So you cant read. π
27.01.2025 17:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No. Of course not. Liverpool fans would never send abuseβ¦β¦..oh wait
27.01.2025 16:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh no. Liverpool fans never send abuse
27.01.2025 16:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The most impressive thing is how no Liverpool fan complainedβ¦β¦β¦β¦. Oh wait
27.01.2025 15:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You wonder why right wing think tanks are held in such contempt when you promote obvious nonsense like this? The only thing this tells us is how framing questions matters. It is just more bad faith
27.01.2025 13:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is from the Royal Society. Do you know better than them as well?
27.01.2025 10:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Are you a climate change denier as well?
27.01.2025 10:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βThere are none so blind as those who will not seeβ
27.01.2025 10:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Really? Which of the papers I linked you to was βmade upβ?
27.01.2025 10:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Sorry, I was linking you to something more your level. So link me to the paper that shows ploughed, reseeded and fertilised βimproved grasslandβ is a healthy functioning ecosystem
27.01.2025 10:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No. It didnβt. You do realise that you just asserting things does not make it true?
27.01.2025 10:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No. It is. This is taught a University as a basic ecological concept.
27.01.2025 10:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes I am. I am posting numerous papers showing how species richness is linked to a healthy ecosystem. You have not produced ONE paper that shows heavily degraded ecosystems can be considered healthy.
27.01.2025 10:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0βIn a healthy ecosystem, a numerous and balanced range of species exists to preserve the stability of an ecosystem.β - Yes it does
27.01.2025 10:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No Iβm not. The two are inextricably linked. An ecosystem cannot be βThrivingβ in an ecological sense if the species richness is heavily degraded.
27.01.2025 10:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So where did you study ecology
27.01.2025 10:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0