Adam Davis

Will leaguepass get you the games on peacock?

And a religious southerner as well. He should be our Zelenskyy.

And I’ll be in CT in a few weeks.
If you’re going to Yosemite I’d highly recommend Tioga pass rather than the valley. The high country is sublime.

Moonlit glacier point

We just left Yosemite today. Welcome to Cali!

Why can’t they use bird rights?

Unusual day for me:

Wordle 1,472 3/6*

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Also feels like they may be collecting future 2nds to help get off Simon’s and Giang’s contracts. We were getting a bit low on the future 2nd’s cupboard.

This isn’t at all like RFk jr or other grifters. This is honest academic debate with unknown answers.

I’m not arguing her analysis was right. I’m arguing that your and other’s critique of her isn’t being fair to what her intent was. I think academics should argue and try to figure out cost effectiveness of different interventions. Then if you’re wrong you update your model in a genuine way.

But implying that she wanted to save money and let people die is unfair. She was trying to make a claim for what would be the most effective use of a set amount of money to save the most lives.

So she was wrong on parts of her analysis (especially that the dollar amount was not fixed). And it’s fair to critique her and it would be interesting to see what she would say about it now in retrospect. Clearly the PEPFAR project has been a unique force of good.

Now, turns out the dollars weren’t indifferent to what they paid for and paying for treatment was politically attractive and brought more money to the project. And that also ended up lowering the cost of treatment which was a virtuous cycle.

I don’t think this is a fair critique of what she wrote or stated. She argued that compared to prevention methods treatment was not cost effective and so if you were going to spend x number of dollars than using x on prevention would save more lives.

I mean I think it seems possible to keep Tatum/Brown/White/Pritchard core, reset tax and not give up any real draft assets which I think sounded unlikely before offseason. Maybe even keep Kornet. Just need to get off the new salaries which seems doable.

100%. Try to move Simons and Niang. See if we can create enough space to make room for Kornet and Horford. If not move Hauser too. Well done Brad.

Ooh, I’d love more sports and comedy and joy on this app. What actual changes would you suggest the developers make to balance out the vibes? I barely ever post so I’m not bothered by the reply guys directly, but I want more migration so more of the voices I enjoy are here.

It is more complicated than simple plurality but it reflects the electorates preferences much better.

I don’t think it’s all that complicated. If you are anyone but X you can just rank the top 5 polling candidates that aren’t x in your order of preference. In fact you likely only need to get the top 2 non-x candidates and whatever other 3 you like in your order of preference.

10 year old boy with face obscured with a homemade sign that reads “you don’t like brown people, I do not like orange people”

My son made his sign:

An incredibly beautiful meditation.

Since it was a unanimous vote wouldn't it be easy to override the veto?

If 25% of trump voters flipped their vote to Dem that would've been the largest popular vote margin since 1936. 25% is enormous.

Not sure that I trust these voters would actually switch their vote next time, but if they all did that would be 60.8% dem to 37.4% gop. That would be the largest popular vote victory since FDR in 1936.

This misses that Dems approvals have not been improving. Trump is losing popularity but Dems because of their failure to respond to the moment have been unable to increase they're approval. Shouldn't be hard in this environment, but Schumer is utterly failing.

Slow down the Senate to a crawl. Ensure no unanimous consent for anything. Publicly encourage anti-trump protests. Speak clearly about corruption. Speak clearly about lawlessness. Don't write letters. Don't have messaging bills for things already illegal.

For me it's understanding how few teams have cap space and there general distribution into apron tiers greatly restrict the number of teams that could absorb large salaries that helped me realize how challenging this next stage will be and how unsatisfying the coming moves will be.

Right, but there's very few teams that can send back less than 70%-80% of salary because they would need significant cap space, right? I mean unless it's Brooklyn we're looking mostly at trades limited by what teams can do over the cap? Or am I misunderstanding?

But conversely, FastPP should.

For all the streamers, YouTube TV, Max etc?