Tica the Sloth's Avatar

Tica the Sloth

@ticasloth.bsky.social

Lady sloth (two-toed)

75 Followers  |  40 Following  |  138 Posts  |  Joined: 22.08.2023  |  1.9909

Latest posts by ticasloth.bsky.social on Bluesky

I'm so happy with my commission!! It was so good to meet you!! Love it when my fandoms collide (Myst + furry)

04.08.2025 01:06 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Omg that was so long ago...!

11.02.2025 14:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I always thought they created the term because "MLP fans" were assumed to be girls by default.

28.01.2025 05:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You always had the option to print out the forms from the IRS website and fill them out yourself (or digitally file them on the IRS website).

The software helps you fill out the forms. You weren't required to use it.

10.01.2025 06:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

2/2

13.11.2024 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Artists have to make a living too, and if there are people who are buying at their prices, then they are running their business appropriately.

(and if the price really is too high for the market? The artist will figure that out on their own when they aren't making sales.)

20.09.2024 19:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There's a difference between "I want it but I can't afford it" and "the price is too high."

The first one is life; it sucks but it happens. We've all been there.

The second one is entitlement. You're not so special that you deserve for someone to drop the price just for you.

20.09.2024 19:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If someone buys it, the price wasn't too high. These are luxury items; we have no moral imperative to make sure everyone can access them.

If no one buys, the seller will have to drop the price to make the sale. That's just how it works. It's up to the market.

20.09.2024 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't see why it's important for people to say that the price for fursuits or art is "too high."

The only time that would be acceptable is if an artist complaining about not making sales. Then, suggesting they lower the price might be appropriate.

20.09.2024 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It's so cruel to sell something like that out from under his kids and grandkids.

03.09.2024 17:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm so sorry, friend...

03.09.2024 12:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That's part of the experience of this movie. You're never prepared.......

28.08.2024 06:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@kreoche.bsky.social

28.08.2024 06:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I just went ahead and deleted the post that I made. Next time I'm going to clarify that I will block self-recommendations on sight unless they link to a quality portfolio (more than 10 examples, including at least one example of the specific thing I'm trying to purchase).

08.08.2024 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Be careful posting anything on bluesky with the com-word that means exchanging money for art.

You will get a bunch of replies from people with portfolios of wildly varying quality, or even zero art posts at all, whose replies are almost 100% begging for work or self-recommending on similar posts.

08.08.2024 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No thanks

05.08.2024 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'll look into that for sure!! If it is what it sounds like, I can actually make the art myself and would just need help with the rigging or programming

01.08.2024 17:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

:D :D :D

31.07.2024 21:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

okay.

hey, I just wanted to say, like, I'm a huge fan of your art and writing, and I don't really want to have a contentious conversation with you! I'm sorry for anything I said that might have come across as negative or rude. I feel dogpiled and overwhelmed, so I am disconnecting now.

26.06.2024 20:17 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

sorry, hit enter to soon--to elaborate, I don't equate intelligence with sentience.

chickens are intelligent, but I still eat them.

26.06.2024 20:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes

26.06.2024 20:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not "defending" or "advocating" for it. I am trying to describe it accurately.

I agree that people are treating me as though I'm defending it. I blame character limits. too much assuming and not enough room to really talk

26.06.2024 20:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you, I will give this a read

26.06.2024 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So like... there's no reason to believe that silicon is inherently unable to replicate what meat and electricity can, right? When you break it down like that?

So then going up a few levels, you look at what is being done. AI is a black box so we're both trying to judge from the end result.

26.06.2024 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, our common ape ancestor spontaneously developed fundamentally new capabilities and dominated the entire planet. So there is a precedent.

26.06.2024 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a hypothetical regarding potential future capabilities, not current ones

26.06.2024 20:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

this I fully agree with. I don't think LLMs are the path to AGI.

26.06.2024 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

look, I'm trying to have a real conversation here, but it's difficult with character limits. I really don't appreciate people talking down to me or ad hom-ing like this. what would I even be a "faithful believer" in here? I hate generative AI. I wish it didn't exist.

26.06.2024 20:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, when you get down to the brass tacks of dopamine/seratonin/GABA signaling, neurons firing, etc., is this not algorithmic?

26.06.2024 20:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

I am also associated with the rationalist movement.

At least we've uncovered the source of our disagreement!

26.06.2024 20:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@ticasloth is following 20 prominent accounts