Sounds like an expensive idealism)
19.12.2025 10:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@mgorbachev.bsky.social
PhD in philosophy, working on philosophy of consciousness, illusionism; a little bit of neuroscience and ai
Sounds like an expensive idealism)
19.12.2025 10:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Actually there was a mistake: we should rather say what makes a proposition true.
I this case what you mentioned are procedures of truth making. But what makes it true?
What does make a fact true?
15.12.2025 13:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Actually I like that we have nonphysicalists of all types. These people remind me of the beginning of philosophy. Especially when they are very smart people! It is very fascinating to see what tricky and picturesque things they built!
15.12.2025 13:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think Kripke just chooses the essences of things pointing to a secondary intension. If you are ready for primary intension (or a particular property) to become an essence, anything can be rigid designator.
12.12.2025 05:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you were offered a world in which no one would ever commit crimes from this moment on, but those who have already done so would remain unpunished, would you regard the latter as a loss and moral cost?
28.11.2025 23:22 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is how boredom looks like
27.11.2025 12:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 02/ we can face controversial social consequences cause I see it as a problem now when people think AI is conscious/agent/subject etc. And quasi strategy makes this more relevant.
23.11.2025 05:01 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 01.I think such starting point can be problematic. Quasi notions here are inclusive enough to take even a robovacuum cleaner as quasi agent. This is pragmatically doubtful and does no ontological work in terms of subjectivity problem. What is may be more important β if we really adopt such a strategy
23.11.2025 04:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In his recent paper @davidchalmers.bsky.social introduced a first step strategy for AI agency assessment. He suggests that we can at least use the notions of quasi beliefs, desires and agency. These are AI behavior interpretable as having beliefs, desires and agency.
bsky.app/profile/davi...
a new paper on mind, computation, and identity in large language models. with inspiration from raymond carver (title) and severance (thought experiments).
i'll be talking about this on saturday at the eleos AI conference on AI consciousness and welfare in berkeley.
philpapers.org/rec/CHAWWT-8
The Persuaders will be live again tomorrow at 1pm EST, 6pm GMT, when they will asking if our beliefs are formed by rational processes and if it matters. The Truth Demon may also put in an appearance. www.youtube.com/watch?v=duI3... @petemandik.bsky.social
17.11.2025 18:17 β π 8 π 5 π¬ 0 π 1How would you define βruleβ for a language rule? It seems like Kripke had a very weird one that has to determine our usage in a strong (mb even ontologically strong) sense.
17.11.2025 11:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Do you know this is your hand or you are sure it is?
14.11.2025 12:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ethically or epistemically controversial?
14.11.2025 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm slowpoke then) But I was thinking about many episodes of continuous story!
14.11.2025 12:20 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Here is the link: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
13.11.2025 16:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is map of a fruit-fly brain neurons. Imagine a human brain complexity. Is there still anything in your experience you think cannot be explained without postulating something nonphysical?
13.11.2025 11:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The more I look at @petemandik.bsky.socialβs comics (dailynous.com/tag/mind-chu...) the more I want to watch a cartoon visualized by him.
13.11.2025 04:50 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 1Good answer! But this might be ok for someone.
12.11.2025 17:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Pete and I discuss Jonathan Birch's book on sentience. Featuring a special guest appearance by Indi! www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9ue...
@birchlse.bsky.social
Join us in 60 minutes! It'll be *bona* (despite my lack of riah)
21.10.2025 16:05 β π 10 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0New in draft with Susan Schneider, David Sahner, Robert Lawrence Kuhn & Mark Bailey - a primer on central ideas and concepts in the AI consciousness debate. If you're looking for a toehold in the sea of jargon, this might help.
philpapers.org/rec/SCHIAC-22
Starting in under an hour! Some preparatory reading here petemandik.substack.com/p/you-dont-k...
02.09.2025 16:05 β π 18 π 5 π¬ 4 π 0Whatβs your answer to the question βWhy do we need to study philosophy?β?
I realized that I rather try to defend philosophy than to explain why itβs important.
www.aiornot.com
Probably there are much more of them!
The Persuaders, Episode 2. Pete tries to persuade us that all conscious content is conceptual. www.youtube.com/live/S7FjpEH...
@petemandik.bsky.social
This is exactly why sometimes people think Humphreyβs surrealism is a realist approach.
17.08.2025 09:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The Persuaders: Overture - YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T77...
12.08.2025 19:26 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 1I canβt even confidently match a real objectβs purple color to one of these)
14.08.2025 17:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0