Chris Cox

Social Context Matters for Turn‐Taking Dynamics: A Comparative Study of Autistic and Typically Developing Children Engaging in fluent conversation is a surprisingly complex task that requires interlocutors to promptly respond to each other in a way that is appropriate to the social context. In this study, we dise...

Conversational turn-taking feels effortless, but it's a complex dance. We find social context—who you're talking to and what you're talking about—fundamentally changes conversational dynamics in both autistic & TD children. 1/

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... w @chrismmcox.bsky.social

One @interacting-minds.bsky.social initiative that I'm very proud of is our Friday writing cafe.

If you're around @au.dk and want to experience the magic of co-writing, come along tomorrow at 10.00 - 14.00. There'll be snacks! Big thx to our organisers @chrismmcox.bsky.social @trupthi.bsky.social

Follow @interacting-minds.bsky.social for a view into an interdisciplinary research environment on - surprise - interacting minds and bodies. It brings in researchers from humanities and health research, from social and natural sciences. And listen to the podcasts, interactingminds.au.dk/podcast!

Evidence for Infant-directed Speech Preference Is Consistent Across Large-scale, Multi-site Replication and Meta-analysis Abstract. There is substantial evidence that infants prefer infant-directed speech (IDS) to adult-directed speech (ADS). The strongest evidence for this claim has come from two large-scale investigati...

Our mega-analysis of infant-directed speech preference is now out at Open Mind, integrating data from a multi-lab replication (@manybabies.org) and a meta-analysis. w/ @chrismmcox.bsky.social, @chbergma.bsky.social, Maya Mathur, @mcxfrank.bsky.social + a fab team
direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...  1/

ManyBabies Workshop: Power AnalysisPresenter Christopher M. M. Cox (Aarhus University) leads an interactive workshop on power analysis. The workshop includes... Workshop: Power Analysis

How do you plan a study? Would increase trials help, or rather participants? @chrismmcox.bsky.social has you covered w a great integrated simulation-based power analysis tutorial:
- video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWCe...
- commented code: 4ccoxau.github.io/PowerAnalysi...
#psysky #neurosky

Definitely check out the website if you're looking for beautiful code to run simulation-based power analyses: 4ccoxau.github.io/PowerAnalysi...

@chrismmcox.bsky.social put together a really incredible resource.

Our Power Analysis workshop, led by @chrismmcox.bsky.social, is TOMORROW! You can still register to attend live or get the recording link sent to you by going to manybabies.org/events/

See you there!

#stats #devpsych #manybabies

Events >Upcoming Events #### March 12, 2024 - 14:00-15:30 UTC (3-4:30pm CET) on Zoom ### Power Analysis workshop #### Christopher Cox, *Aarhus University* In this workshop, Christopher Cox (with the support ...

Our next workshop is coming up soon!

Power Analysis
March 12, 2024 | 14:00-15:30 UTC (3-4:30pm CET) on Zoom
Presented by: @chrismmcox.bsky.social, Aarhus University

Learn more and register now!
manybabies.org/events/

#psychsky #devpsych #manybabies #academicsky

The following may also be helpful:

Claesen, A., Gomes, S., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2021). Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies. Royal Society Open Science, 8(10), 211037.
doi.org/10.1098/rsos...

New paper from @thaliawheatley.bsky.social, me, @stolkarjen.bsky.social & @lukejchang.bsky.social at Perspectives on Psychological Science!

"The Emerging Science of Interacting Minds"

Read about why we think that this is an auspicious moment for interaction science!

Link: doi.org/10.1177/1745...

"Repeat after me? Both autistic & neurotypical children commonly align their language with that of their caregivers" in which we critically assess alignment and echolalia, out now in Cognitive Science:  dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs... w @ethanweed.bsky.social, @rockberta.bsky.social &al. A thread: 1/n

Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data sets Wide distribution of findings shows how analytical choices drive conclusions. Wide distribution of findings shows how analytical choices drive conclusions.

As I said elsewhere: What's supposed to be surprising about arriving at different results under different models making different assumptions, using different methods that also make different assumptions? It's almost as if our inference depends on the model & method.

www.nature.com/articles/d41...