I mean, the blow job is technically penetration, and it was still sexual assault even though the perpetrator was the one being penetrated
12.10.2025 20:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@springtimewanderer.bsky.social
Edinburgh based wanderer
I mean, the blow job is technically penetration, and it was still sexual assault even though the perpetrator was the one being penetrated
12.10.2025 20:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0why does it say "say journalists" when one of the people pictured is India Willoughby? Last time I checked he's not a journalist.
12.10.2025 20:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0maybe not the plagiarism part though ๐ฌ
23.09.2025 22:22 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"property victimization"???
11.09.2025 12:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0because the ruling doesn't do that, but the statement is stating an opinion as fact. "there has been a surge of transphobic hate promoted by the far-right, for political advantage" is out of touch - there hasn't been a surge of hate, and the 'far-right' bogeyman here is Sturgeonite nonsense.
11.09.2025 11:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0thanks for the link. To pick one obvious example "the Supreme Court ruling of the 16 April goes against both recent and past European Court of Human Rights judgements" is out of touch and incorrect. The partisan language used throughout the statement would have left me quite happy to vote against it
11.09.2025 11:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I think that says more about how wildly out of touch the TUC is tbh. The EHRC guidance doesn't contain "trans exclusion and hate", it just affirms that biological sex actually matters in some situations. You can be in favour of accomodating trans people where possible without denying this.
11.09.2025 10:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0that includes "misgendering" as a violent hate crime though, so...
11.09.2025 10:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0nominative determinism lives
15.08.2025 21:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0once the lawsuits kick in this tragic social contagion will be confined to the history books
13.08.2025 15:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0aww reply and then immediate Bluesky turbo block, like the total fucking pussy you are
12.08.2025 19:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Mate, you fucking lost. Badly. Lose the superior attitude and start showing a little more contrition.
12.08.2025 18:42 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0oh for Christ's sake ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
12.08.2025 10:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0the vast majority of whom have now rowed back their support and admitted they made a bad mistake. The only reason people from "all parties" voted for it was cowardice and a hope that they could get it done and forget about it.
12.08.2025 10:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0it was the consensus before anyone thought about it in detail - when the ramifications became clear, sensible people from every party took a step back.
12.08.2025 09:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I want medical professionals to be consulted, not people who spend their Saturdays painting signs showing JK Rowling being dismembered in creative ways
12.08.2025 09:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The problem is you use "GC" to refer to anyone who isn't a gung ho trans ideologue. It's like complaining there were no radical islamist or white supremacist organisations asked to contribute to a report on political extremism.
12.08.2025 09:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sturgeon was the driving force - if her party hadn't been so terrified of her, cooler heads would have prevailed before it got as bad as it did.
12.08.2025 09:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0and yet, that's pretty much what Sturgeon's ill-fated GRR act would have enabled
11.08.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0At the moment, thanks to the Cass Review and Wes Streeting, far fewer than you would like. However I also care about minors in places like America who are having their lives ruined.
This is because I'm not one of those weirdos whose compassion only extends as far as an arbitrary line on a map.
Oh well, bye then. The turbo block on BS is so tiresome - these idiots are creating a bubble where dissent from their fragile opinions simply does not exist as far as they're concerned.
11.08.2025 23:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0there's a very easy way to sort this out - trans people can do whatever they like as long as it does not conflict with anyone else's rights. That means trans women stay out of women's sport, prisons and rape crisis centres, and it means minors don't get irreversible drugs and surgery. Easy.
11.08.2025 21:23 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0The detail was anyone who self identifies as a woman is legally a woman. This is why Sturgeon couldn't answer a straight question on Isla Bryson because it exposed the gigantic problem with self ID.
11.08.2025 21:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0they're the least at-risk minority in Britain
11.08.2025 21:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0it's telling that support for the reforms rapidly decreased the more people found out about the detail
11.08.2025 21:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0But don't you think it's significant that "Westminster" overrode "Scottish legislation" to overwhelming public approval and relief in, you know, Scotland?
11.08.2025 13:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The problem wasn't "transphobes". Major compromises were inevitable as soon as anyone thought about the detail rather than just the principle - that was always going to happen. Sturgeon's failure was an inability to think rationally and agree to sensible carve outs on sport, prison, children etc.
11.08.2025 13:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0๐คฃ
11.08.2025 13:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0๐
Sure. Ok, go in peace, David.
Sorry, I'm not reading all of this shit. Go back to talking to your echo chamber and we'll both be much happier with our day.
10.08.2025 13:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0