Hopscotch Cortazar

Only a man in a quarter-zip fleece vest would enforce this rule so ardently.

LaLa is just consistently so good.

Seems like a good thing to add to Schumers list of demands.

That caption goes to 11.

The old “Answering a question which presumed a proper procedure occurred by failing to answer, “yes this is how that proper procedure occurred” and instead viewing the question as inferring improper interference and then insisting your own guilty assumption is untrue” trick.

Tell me again which photo you posted of yourself to get a million tinder dates?

The notion that any Chicago police would hold themselves to the strictures of the 4th Amendment when they happen upon a gun is laughable.

If you read this “list of demands” in any other decade of American history you’d ask why the lead Democrat Senator is pushing to deputize the Klan.

If you read this “list of demands” in any other decade of American history you’d ask why the lead Democrat Senator is pushing to deputize the Klan.

Cook County’s new prosecutor has weakened an already broken system for freeing the innocent State’s Attorney Eileen O’Neill Burke’s Conviction Integrity Unit hasn’t exonerated anyone in her 10 months on the job, and she has done little to confront more than a dozen coercion allegations again...

You must not be familiar with Eileen Burke. www.injusticewatch.org/project/deny...

I was told Obama (and Hilary and Kamala) were the one who would take away our guns.

What if I was an edge-lord that just listens and lurks?

May we all never cease whistling when in his presence.

They are losing.

A very difficult first step toward victory.

“Can we just shoot them in the legs?” This was only 5.5 years ago.

Nothing better than people describing how these tactics are similar to insurgencies the world over AND then failing to mention what citizens are employing these tactics for: to engage in constitutionally protected action. Their astonishing discipline is evident from their commitment to non violence

“Suspect.” Sounds right. Any citizen exercising constitutional rights is a “suspect” to them. And therein lies the problem.

You proceed now you are certainly facing a DOJ that will claim Supremacy Clause immunity, which is not an insignificant legal hurdle in these cases. Ultimately, I think they wait to see what happens in the next election. And then go from there. (I think they can prevail now, but it’s far riskier)

While unsatisfying, there are good strategic reason to wait. There’s no statute of limitations on murder. Even murder investigations with video take months to line up and that’s when you don’t have a government agency obstructing the process. And if..

But it’s common police practice to secure a gun in a car until evidence tech comes to document and recover. Especially if scene is not immediately secure.

The biggest breach of proper crime scene investigation is posting a photo of the weapon, thereby imparting all sorts of information about the incident to non-witnesses or agents who did not have a clear view of gun. Double edged sword if serial number is registered to a fed and it was a drop gun.

Which as other commenters note, could easily be established in a judicial warrant.

Probable cause only would be involved once Feds prove that a person is guilty of remaining in US after removal order has been issued.

It seems the “higher risk” argument for unauthorized immigrants is belied by the application of the 4th amendment to all that reside in the US, irrespective of immigration status. Further, an order of removal (a civil procedure) does not invoke a probable cause determination.

Just watched Terminator 2. We are all just Sarah Connor at this point.

T15 law school acceptance carrying a lot of weight here. But thems the perks of acing the LSAT.

Tell me you haven’t spent much time in close proximity to these agents or understand their general response when you point a cell phone camera at them without using those words.

Important outstanding question re: (1) was whether had a justification to initiate a stop/detainment based on 18 usc 111. Assuming blocking a road with a car amounts to force, it appears they would. Still doesn’t resolve whether agents decision to stand in front of car or shots 2/3 were w-in scope.

And here we have the limits of false narrative building: “agents are under attack!” Being overly-sensitive to the potential dangers of an automobile from past trauma counters an argument that he was acting as a “reasonable police officer” would in the same situation per the self defense standard.