Adam Leon Smith's Avatar

Adam Leon Smith

@adamleonsmith.bsky.social

Technology product safety advocate. AI standards expert. Chair of AIQI. Chair of BCS F-TAG. NoLeFa-84.

298 Followers  |  979 Following  |  53 Posts  |  Joined: 25.12.2023  |  2.1965

Latest posts by adamleonsmith.bsky.social on Bluesky

Is AI harder than cement? Is the EU AI Act being delayed?
Based on recent reports, the EU AI Act isn't being delayed, yet, but there are significant delays in the harmonised technical standards that companies rely on for compliance guidance.

Is AI harder than cement? Is the EU AI Act being delayed? Based on recent reports, the EU AI Act isn't being delayed, yet, but there are significant delays in the harmonised technical standards that companies rely on for compliance guidance.

adamleonsmith.substack.com/p/is-ai-hard...

07.06.2025 11:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Task-level AI assurance The missing piece in the conversation

I wrote something for the first time in a while.

AI assurance needs to move beyond generic process frameworks into task level measures:

open.substack.com/pub/adamleon...

06.06.2025 05:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: Conformity assessment bodies can carry out their activities on the territory of third countries. The NANDO database shows that they can also based in other countries - e.g. Australia, Canada and Japan

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"Decision 768/2008/EC sets out that conformity assessment bodies must be located in the EU in order to test to EU regulations"

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: This is true. National accreditation bodies are non-profit regulators, they "check the checkers". Why would anyone benefit from regulators being competitive?

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"Regulation 765/2008 requires each Member State to appoint a single national accreditation body that can accredit conformity assessment bodies and prohibits competition among Member Statesโ€™ national accreditation bodies."

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: That's not a real policy.

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"new policies implemented by the European Commission, such as a refusal to reference underlying standards developed outside of Europe"

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: As a non-EU national participating in the standards drafting process, along with many others, I beg to differ.

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"[European standards organisations] generally exclude non-EU nationals from participating in their standard-drafting process. In the limited instances where non-EU nationals do participate, they are not allowed to vote."

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: Cooperation between ISO/IEC and CEN-CENELEC is codified in the Vienna and Frankfurt agreements, which can and DO allow for parallel development and identical adoption as harmonised standards.

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"[European standards] can only be developed through three European Standards Organizations (ESOs)"

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: European standards place exactly the same burden on all producers.

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"U.S. workers and exporters thus face additional burdens in accessing the EU market not faced by domestic producers in the EU and often not faced by EU exporters when accessing the U.S. market."

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FACT: The application of harmonised or other standards remains voluntary, and the manufacturer can always apply other technical specifications to meet the requirements. The presumption of conformity is optional, but a highly beneficial tool for reducing compliance costs for EVERYONE.

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"Products regulated by the EU must conform to these EU-specific regional standards in order to benefit from a 'presumption of conformity' with the EUโ€™s essential regulatory requirements."

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The US has published its 2025 Foreign Trade Barriers report. It takes a hard swipe at the European Standardisation system. I appreciate that it covers a wide range of topics, from bananas to AI, but there are a few statements in there that really need correction.

ustr.gov/sites/defaul...

11.04.2025 08:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
France and Germany unveil Docs, a homegrown alternative to Google Docs The Trump administration has set out to drastically reshape the relationship between the US and Europe. In response, Brussels is scrambling to adapt to this new reality,...

I have said before that many services provided by US big tech firms can be easily replaced, given enough motivation.

search.app/rDp29

21.03.2025 07:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This has to be right. Starmer's summit on Sunday has become a potentially decisive moment. If Europeans don't throw their weight behind Ukraine and behind a massive and immediate increase in their defence efforts (& damn the deficits), Europe will find itself at the mercy of Putin & Trump.

28.02.2025 18:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1413    ๐Ÿ” 349    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 27    ๐Ÿ“Œ 15
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT

Uk opts not to sign Al agreement - what does this mean for global Al ethics?
The UK has chosen not to sign the international Al agreement at the Paris Al summit saying it "did not provide enough practical clarity on global governance, nor sufficiently addressed harder questions around national security and the challenge Al poses to it".

Adam Leon Smith DEng FBCS, Al expert at BCS, commented:

"When we surveyed technology experts last year, 88% said it was important that the UK government takes a lead in shaping global ethical standards in Al and other high-stakes technologies.

Whether that's through a declaration or not, the world's richest countries will ultimately need to show they can put geo-politics aside, balance Al innovation with safety, and be responsible enough to work together at this critical moment in human history."

What's your view? Should the UK take a stronger stance on global Al governance? Let us know in the comments.

#AI #Artificiallntelligence #AlEthics
#TechLeadership

BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT Uk opts not to sign Al agreement - what does this mean for global Al ethics? The UK has chosen not to sign the international Al agreement at the Paris Al summit saying it "did not provide enough practical clarity on global governance, nor sufficiently addressed harder questions around national security and the challenge Al poses to it". Adam Leon Smith DEng FBCS, Al expert at BCS, commented: "When we surveyed technology experts last year, 88% said it was important that the UK government takes a lead in shaping global ethical standards in Al and other high-stakes technologies. Whether that's through a declaration or not, the world's richest countries will ultimately need to show they can put geo-politics aside, balance Al innovation with safety, and be responsible enough to work together at this critical moment in human history." What's your view? Should the UK take a stronger stance on global Al governance? Let us know in the comments. #AI #Artificiallntelligence #AlEthics #TechLeadership

BREAKING NEWS

UK OPTS NOT TO SIGN INTERNATIONAL AI DECLARATION

BCS RESPONDS

BREAKING NEWS UK OPTS NOT TO SIGN INTERNATIONAL AI DECLARATION BCS RESPONDS

UK opts not to sign AI agreement โ€“ what does this mean for global AI ethics?

#BCS #AI #AIEthics

12.02.2025 20:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

When do we get Proton Maps?

28.01.2025 21:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So Pedro, where does Meta publish this information exactly? Posting a link would totally prove your point

18.01.2025 21:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

When you realise you are arguing about US social media with the global policy director of Meta...

Or someone with the same name and identical lobby positions.

Is there a block list for US big tech employees?

18.01.2025 20:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am interested whether you work for a US social media company, Pedro

18.01.2025 20:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Agreed, and US companies can also block EU users if they don't want to play by the rules.

18.01.2025 19:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I see. I wonder if this is a reaction to ISO and IEC suing the EC?

18.01.2025 18:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As a consumer I'm quite happy with the outcome in my example.

18.01.2025 18:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I don't know much about US law but it says that congress can approve an extension based on certification from the president. Surely that won't happen so quickly?

Also can an executive order really override primary legislation?

18.01.2025 18:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But on the other hand, that means TikTok will still be accessible through a browser without risk of fines! Unless browsers are considered distribution...

18.01.2025 18:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah, you are right:

Providing services to distribute, maintain, or update such foreign adversary controlled application (including any source code of such application) by means of a marketplace (including an online mobile application store).

18.01.2025 18:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@adamleonsmith is following 20 prominent accounts