Cyborg Tibe

I mean, do they think the economy hasn’t grown since 1970?

The answer isn’t exactly fabulous, but then owners of a lot of businesses. You now can pay for AI models rather that low to moderate productivity workers.

That doesn’t make it a good thing, but it does make it a real thing.

Maybe give the catcher a box like the batter? Maybe having 0 strikes means the walk is 2 bases?

lol. I was thinking of asking you “how did you find all of these anyway?”

But I hope someone does! Definitely interesting

I’ve been thinking and it is good and normal to “cancel” people with power. It is how power works. It isn’t good to cancel some random woman on a plane.

Gina Carano is probably a rough line between the two. C level celeb and gaining a social media following, but not actually all that powerful.

So call it quits while you are on top? Or look for a shark to jump?

I’m kind of shocked China doesn’t have a foot print here.

At first I assumed “all mint” was some sort of terrible English malt beverage.

I think this is pretty good at explaining the extremism and the synchronous timing, but not quite the common alignment in politics.

Maybe something like everyone kind of realizes this is happening so they all fall back to nationalism as a “defense”? A sort of global prisoners dilemma?

In contrast, crypto never even had a new commodity. Money has been “digital” since the 1970s. Protocols are transaction costs, not sources of value (unless they lead to arbitrage).

I don’t think that’s quite it. They thought they were selling shovels to the gold rush, but they turn out to be commodity producers. Still a brand new commodity that will benefit people, but more they have to play games to justify the early valuations.

Dammit. Now I need to buy new shirts

ladies and gentlemen...we got him

GitHub - blebbit/testnet: Run independent ATProtocol networks Run independent ATProtocol networks. Contribute to blebbit/testnet development by creating an account on GitHub.

Run independent @atproto.com networks, for testing and beyond, in docker compose or kubernetes, public or private

Pushed significant updates today #atdev #atprotodev

github.com/blebbit/test...

There’s lots of ways to “beat the book”. I think my favorite is just asking the book “what’s the weather like today?” on two different days.

It is literally a children’s problem that for some reason people continue to take seriously.

It may shock you to learn that I have in fact heard of it and it is a trash thought experiment.

The “book” needs to learn, have emotion, and be able to fall in love to pass Searle’s test.

It isn’t a book.

I’ve only read the first one so far, but yes roughly the long form of what I said. LLMs do stats, structure, inference, objectives as McCartney outlines better than a % of the population.

If you know a test they are below 10th percentile on I’d love to know.

Jfc you really are an idiot. Some of these test use spatial reasoning, or non-language settings.

There are well studied theories of how the brain works, and they have lead to tests that LLMs now pass better than many human beings.

The Turing test is flawed (read the last sentence again) but was the most comprehensive test we had. All the tests from 1) are fractions of a comprehensive test.

So what’s the better test? The median reply here seems to have less reading comprehension than the median LLM now.

Brains use probability to both to learn new things and to represent thoughts. It is very telling when people highlight that aspect of LLMs as being unlike the brain.

I happen to think LLMs are closer to being conscious than books, and I’m pretty confident that you do too.

I regret to inform them that people will move between regions all the time. Like every hour of the day.

Today I learned that I pay taxes on April 15 to someone who is *not* my "Uncle Sam"

Agreed, but I’m not sure giving more levers for, and powers to, subjective judgments is the right way. We’ve seen what being able to declare “national emergencies” has done.

I’d say overhaul congress. How do we force more direct deliberations and votes out of elected members?

Yeah, like is it really racing if it doesn’t have that “vvvVVVVRRRAAOWWwwww” sound?

Meanwhile they are still trying to make it all the way through Article II and can’t say for sure what it means. There are lots of different opinions.

That is much worst than the Turing test. Welcome to the last century.

You probably should read the last sentence. The whole point is that it is a pretty bad test, if you have a better one that if an AI passed it you’d be willing to call it conscious I’d love to hear it.

There is a delicious kind of irony here where the man who has produced very little value for the company in 10 years has a threat of basically “wouldn’t it be a shame if we were valued only on what we actually produced in the last 10 years”

“Tell your children who the cowards were.”