Fava Bean's Avatar

Fava Bean

@fava.bsky.social

Just a bean who likes to follow folks who post pet photos, original art, and reliable journalism.

343 Followers  |  157 Following  |  953 Posts  |  Joined: 10.10.2023  |  2.2267

Latest posts by fava.bsky.social on Bluesky

Whatever else is in the deal, agreeing to merely have a vote on ACA is a fig leaf. Even if it passes the Senate, it won't in the House, which also makes it an easy yes vote for the Senate Rs who might want to, defusing it as an attack on them.

It is a stupid ask even on Team Schumer's own terms.

10.11.2025 00:28 β€” πŸ‘ 836    πŸ” 178    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 8

It guarantees the vote? They're giving Republicans what they want without that vote! What do these losers think "guaratees" means?

They should have locked in the ACA tax credits FIRST, before the CR (and frankly even that's too little). They had all the leverage. They are losers to the core!

10.11.2025 00:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Biden did a lot of good things. Appointing brave people to uphold the law in difficult situations was not one of them.

09.11.2025 19:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lots of hard, shitty lessons being learned from this presidency. And one of the many I hope you're learning is, white supremacy is incompatible with reality, and cannot exist without historical revisionism.

09.11.2025 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 3289    πŸ” 1170    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So it turns out... the US air travel system was incredibly, deeply dependent on federal funding to just run day-to-day all this time, to the benefit of private airline shareholders, when everyone thinks that state-run trains are leeching off the government. Weird!

09.11.2025 00:10 β€” πŸ‘ 17267    πŸ” 4510    πŸ’¬ 137    πŸ“Œ 115

COVID caused a lot of hospital bills and long-term side effects. It was a big factor in the "K-shaped" recovery in which many of us are doing better while another cohort is much worse.

09.11.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the US: Healthcare.

Any interaction with a hospital can cost thousands and insurance doesnt help most of us. My deductible is $6600!

09.11.2025 10:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Three questions:
1. Is who politicians follow online newsworthy?
2. Is the vice-president more important than a primary candidate to be junior Senator from Texas?
3. If the answer is yes to the first two, why isn’t Axios doing a fuck ton of stories about who JD Vance is following?

09.11.2025 04:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2284    πŸ” 433    πŸ’¬ 58    πŸ“Œ 13

Aviation is inherently dangerous: a million pounds of metal and fuel magically flying at 500mph. The engineering and systems we have developed are just amazing and have given everyone the idea that it’s all cheap and safe. It ain’t. It’s expensive and it requires constant vigilance and organization.

05.11.2025 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 205    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 4

one thing i find crazy-making is the idea that getting rid of the filibuster would make congress a purely majoritarian institution. bicameralism itself is counter-majoritarian! equal state representation is counter-majoritarian! the fact that senate elections are staggered is counter-majoritarian!

08.11.2025 22:26 β€” πŸ‘ 5781    πŸ” 736    πŸ’¬ 102    πŸ“Œ 35

It occurred to me, while responding to a comment, that at this point someone will be needed to wake the president during press conferences just to make sure that he hasn't passed away.

08.11.2025 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

I’m not an American historian but my general sense is that most of the countermajoritarian stuff is there to protect slavery. But today they probably mean republicans when they say small states or rural interests and does that sound right? We need countermajoritarian tools so dems don’t win?

08.11.2025 23:13 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

the OTHER thing is that no filibuster defender has yet to articulate why it is that people who happen to live in low density states not only deserve additional representation but also deserve to exercise a veto *on top of that*

08.11.2025 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1903    πŸ” 229    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 10

Meanwhile, Trump is defying court orders anyway, and his lawlessness and cruelty is finally breaking through politically. Why give him two days where he is technically not defying the court? Why cancel those headlines? Why make it BOTH SIDES agreeing he can do this for now?

08.11.2025 22:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If the conservatives on SCOTUS want to allow Trump to starve kids, they will find a way to do that. I dont think this gift from KBJ will stop Roberts next week.

08.11.2025 21:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There's a generation of Dems that don't understand appropriate strategies in the face of shameless lawlessness. Even kind of allowing the lawlessness to continue is unacceptable. Force the Republicans to do it on their own, without even the barest hint from decent people that it might be OK.

08.11.2025 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

KBJ should have done what is right and upheld the order to feed people, not written a politically calculated endorsement of a few more days of starvation.

If Republicans are going to be evil, make THEM be evil. Don't pretend SNAP denial is not such an evil action that we can wait for resolution.

08.11.2025 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The right way to handle the government illegally starving people is NOT to let them keep illegally starving people because legal procedure might have otherwise let them illegally starve people with a different schedule of court hearings.

08.11.2025 15:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Apples go well with cheese, but not like this!

08.11.2025 14:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

(Forbes) - The Trump Organization’s second-term push to monetize Donald Trump’s presidency has reached the aisles of military exchanges, as Coast Guard-run stores .. have stocked Trump-branded wine and cider. 🀑

@zacheverson.com
www.forbes.com/sites/zachev...

07.11.2025 12:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2450    πŸ” 1182    πŸ’¬ 285    πŸ“Œ 176

Right. And beating up the nerd at lunch time might have prevented hospitalization by giving him a mere black eye. She chose to do harm herself in the vain hope that it would prevent other harm.

If the harm is coming anyway, Dems need to let the REPUBLICANS do all of the harm.

08.11.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"I had to beat up the nerd at lunch to prevent my classmates from beating him up after school."

08.11.2025 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Two words for everyone who wants us to trust a Biden appointee who just made a horrible legal decision: Merrick Garland

08.11.2025 14:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

People kept saying that about Merrick Fucking Garland.

"The Dem lawyers are smart" is a statement that no longer holds water.

She just issued a ruling to let Trump starve people a little longer. Morally bankrupt, strategically worthless.

08.11.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"My classmates were going to beat up the nerd after school so I beat him up at lunch to prevent that."

08.11.2025 13:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

/2 1. Real human beings will suffer from even a brief stay. 2. The government's position is transparently dishonest and in bad faith. 3. The Supreme Court has lost any benefit of the doubt. They have lost the mandate of the heaven that is the rule of law.

08.11.2025 02:43 β€” πŸ‘ 3021    πŸ” 513    πŸ’¬ 38    πŸ“Œ 17

I think we need to stop calling it empathy and go back to calling it decency. It isn't a favour you're doing someone else, it's you proving that you aren't a fucking ghoul

07.11.2025 14:09 β€” πŸ‘ 5947    πŸ” 1341    πŸ’¬ 56    πŸ“Œ 37

I’m pretty sure winning a slam dunk lawsuit against this criminal extortion would have been cheaper than dropping $60m during a bad budget crunch. They didn’t cave to pressure. They collaborated with the regime and sold out their students and staff.

08.11.2025 13:06 β€” πŸ‘ 2240    πŸ” 401    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 7
Preview
Feds Tell Faith Leaders 'No More Prayer' Outside Broadview Facility In a possible violation of the First Amendment, federal officials instructed demonstrators to stop holding religious gatherings outside the immigration processing facility in suburban Broadview after ...

β€œFederal authorities told demonstrators Friday that there would be β€˜no more prayer’ in front of or inside the Broadview ICE facility, in a move that mystified local leaders and raised legal questions.” blockclubchicago.org/2025/11/07/f...

08.11.2025 12:04 β€” πŸ‘ 3319    πŸ” 1335    πŸ’¬ 285    πŸ“Œ 724

It’s shit like this that makes me think the GOP doesn’t care about winning elections and they’re just not planning on having them. Because no one who thinks they have to win elections does this.

08.11.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1094    πŸ” 210    πŸ’¬ 69    πŸ“Œ 38

@fava is following 18 prominent accounts