The 5th Nordic Political Behavior Workshop in Trondheim! @lchristensen.bsky.social @rdassonneville.bsky.social @finseraas.bsky.social et al!
03.10.2025 08:43 — 👍 18 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 2@daniel-a-n-goldstein.com.bsky.social
Assistant Prof/postdoc at UiO. Prior: Max Weber at EUI and PhD at Yale. Political economy, climbing, etc. https://daniel-a-n-goldstein.com/
The 5th Nordic Political Behavior Workshop in Trondheim! @lchristensen.bsky.social @rdassonneville.bsky.social @finseraas.bsky.social et al!
03.10.2025 08:43 — 👍 18 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 2For no particular reason, anyone interested in a model of bureaucratic resistance may find the following interesting! www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... #PolSci
28.08.2025 01:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is the article by Lisa Friedman, whose reporting I have draw on extensively in my work on the EPA and institutional disruption
18.03.2025 07:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The EPA (like most Federal agencies) is facing alarming “institutional erosion”, maybe worse than the chaos of the 1980s. And this quote gets to the real point. This is not about policy differences. These are institutional changes that require acts by Congress #EPA #InstitutionalDisruption #Congress
18.03.2025 07:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0"If someone legally in the United States can be grabbed from his home for engaging in constitutionally protected political activity, we are in a drastically different country from the one we inhabited before," writes our columnist Michelle Goldberg.
11.03.2025 00:32 — 👍 667 🔁 224 💬 31 📌 15Reach out if you’d like to chat about the long-term implications!
jop.blogs.uni-hamburg.de/reversals-of...
With unprecedented firings and resignations, remaining staff may pander toward disruptive leadership—further weakening agency capacity and complicating the recruitment of skilled talent. I’ve expanded on these ideas on the @lseblogs.bsky.social , @broadstreetblog.bsky.social, and in the article
10.02.2025 16:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0When an agency’s internal culture fractures, bureaucrats may stop pursuing core missions—altering policy outcomes and even their commitment to remain in government
wp.me/p3I2YF-eAy
During the first Trump administration, I observed mostly resistance and temporary reversals. But recent news suggests that the current administration might be pushing agencies toward full erosion—jeopardizing their ability to deliver legislated mandates #polisci #econ
10.02.2025 16:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Government workers respond to disruptive leadership in three ways:
1️⃣ Resistance: Sticking to the agency’s mission
2️⃣ Temporary Reversals: A weakened commitment to mission, but agencies can recover
3️⃣ Erosion: Abandoning the mission entirely and missions may take years to recover
Trump’s firing of key officials and the gutting of agencies is more than headlines—it’s reshaping American government capacity with long-term effects on political stability and policy. My @thejop.bsky.social article explores how “institutional disruption” impacts government performance over time 🧵
10.02.2025 16:10 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0The @lsegovernment.bsky.social / STICERD political science & political economy WiP seminar resumes tomorrow with @dang11.bsky.social, and an exciting line up for the Winter Term
21.01.2025 15:58 — 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0Some thoughts on the future of American federal agencies and their capacity under the second Trump administration
wp.me/p3I2YF-eAy