Ben Sedrish's Avatar

Ben Sedrish

@bsedrish.bsky.social

Chicago

252 Followers  |  379 Following  |  172 Posts  |  Joined: 18.10.2023  |  2.4934

Latest posts by bsedrish.bsky.social on Bluesky

I did not say that. If you're trying to pick a fight on the internet go find someone who actually said the thing you want to argue against

17.02.2026 22:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes but I am neither Cory Booker nor Gavin Newsom

17.02.2026 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I wasn't being sarcastic, I was trying to figure out what this person meant. Thanks for jumping in though

17.02.2026 21:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Who are you talking to right now? I am never voting for Newsom (or Klobuchar, or Shapiro, or Whitmer, or Ro Khanna) unless they're the eventual nominee

17.02.2026 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No, I am not saying this is a bad stance. The bad stance would be actually following through and withholding a vote if the alternative is JD Vance.

17.02.2026 18:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Who the fuck is the "you guys" here?

17.02.2026 17:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I do not. Your cynicism has to be at least connected to reality if you want to pass yourself off as someone really wise about politics

17.02.2026 17:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Lol no one is actually this stupid

17.02.2026 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right, I don't know who I'm voting for in the primary (not Newsom), but once that's over it's really important that JD Vance lose

17.02.2026 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh I see. Then once a nominee is chosen and there's no other alternative to JD Vance, *then* you'll hold your nose and vote for them. It's just better to make them think they need to fight for your vote. Got it.

17.02.2026 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

The question is whether you'd vote for these people if they're the nominee. I voted for Bernie and then Warren in the last two primaries and then voted for Hillary and Biden in the general, which was an exceptionally easy moral choice

17.02.2026 16:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm a progressive and I need Donald Trump and JD Vance not to be the fucking president

17.02.2026 16:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So is the line somewhere between Kamala and newsom? Kamala OK but newsom not? (To be clear I hate Newsom and don't think he'll be the nominee)

17.02.2026 16:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is this an accelerationist thing?

17.02.2026 16:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So if it's JD Vance vs Newsom, what's your plan?

17.02.2026 16:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image 14.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1328    πŸ” 261    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 8

Yes! Love Flowers for Dreams, always had good experiences with them

14.02.2026 21:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The deterrence calculus is probably a little different for the rich & powerful who never face consequences vs. the general public.

Iran Contra and J6 are probably better examples than the Civil War, though I think it's fair to question how much senior CSA leadership really was punished.

13.02.2026 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember this home run like my parents remember the Kennedy assassination, just era-defining for a kid from south Louisiana

11.02.2026 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you do start wearing headphones please please just wear one (preferably the right ear)

10.02.2026 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
As Crypto Scams Mount, the CFTC Now Has 1 Enforcement Lawyer in Its Flagship Office The CFTC’s Chicago office, charged with regulating commodities and prediction markets, has gone from about 20 trial lawyers to one.

www.barrons.com/articles/pre...

09.02.2026 21:26 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh man :(

08.02.2026 23:10 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait how conservative is Billy?

08.02.2026 23:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

The most easily manipulable contract of all time?

08.02.2026 21:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Super interesting, thanks for answering. Really enjoy your newsletter! Would love to find something similar for Vancouver, where I'm moving later this month

08.02.2026 19:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Got it. So what's the reason for using low-floor trains on a brand new line?

08.02.2026 19:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Dumb question but what does floor height have to do with the number of doors?

08.02.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Look at the post you were responding to: "The district was Trump +13 in 2024. This is a 37 point shift left."

It's a shift left in *partisan voting results*. The meaning is clear!

08.02.2026 09:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It wasn't defended *in the last election* because Republicans didn't contest it. So a Democrat held the seat because Republicans didn't run anyone against the Dem in 2023. Dems just defended against a Republican flip of the seat.

08.02.2026 09:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It wasn't defended. The last time people in this district voted was the 2024 presidential election. Now apologize to all the people you've accused of being bad at math

08.02.2026 09:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@bsedrish is following 20 prominent accounts