jen forestal's Avatar

jen forestal

@seejenspeak.bsky.social

political theorist, assoc professor at Loyola Chicago. studying digital technologies, democratic practices, (software) architecture, & civic engagement. she/her

3,750 Followers  |  915 Following  |  95 Posts  |  Joined: 05.08.2023  |  2.3661

Latest posts by seejenspeak.bsky.social on Bluesky

Purdue student journalists deliver special 'solidarity' newspaper to IU Bloomington campus The special edition blasted across town features columns from IDS and Exponent editors, alongside QR codes to support both student papers.

Solidarity!! Last week, Indiana University fired the director of student media & halted print on the Indiana Daily Student newspaper. Yesterday, Purdue’s student paper printed the banned edition & drove two hours to deliver it. Incredible www.heraldtimesonline.com/story/news/l...

18.10.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1177    πŸ” 391    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 46

ah, yes! I've also seen the Kirk quote from 2023 (re)circulating now, so thinking about contexts as both multiplatform and also temporally.

this does make me wonder about what is different about context collapse now vs "regular" games of telephone or gossip/hearsay that de/recontextualize.

11.09.2025 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

the collapse of (horrible) contexts on my BS feed means im not even sure which reason that is.

(im assuming Kirk. if so, yes, but what's weird is how it's revealing context collapse not as a *passive* feature, but as the result of the right-wing actively *forcing* x's context to all other spaces)

11.09.2025 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Login - The Association for Political Theory

Reminders for #APT2025!:
➑️ Initial registration deadline is Sept. 10! To remain on the program, please register by then; registration fees increase by $50 after 9/10

➑️ Rooms in the APT block at the conference hotel are going fast! Info on the conference homepage

➑️ New prelim program version is out

05.09.2025 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i guess my point is that i don't know that this is a problem that "more real doctors" would fix, since it's really a question of whether people think there's a responsibility to manage the consequences of our behavior for others, and that the state has a role in doing that

04.09.2025 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

no, i agree it's a problem & that parents would have a legitimate claim to have been harmed, in any reasonable world. but whether a lawsuit would matter to policymakers in this scenario is different. is there any reason to think that the FL courts would not have the same insane "you do you" logic?

04.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
β€œIt was her time on Earth,” the translator said the parents told her. β€œThey believe she’s better off where she is now.”

β€œWe would absolutely not take the MMR,” the mother said in English, referring to the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination children typically receive before attending school. She said her stance on vaccination has not changed after her daughter’s death.

β€œThe measles wasn’t that bad. They got over it pretty quickly,” the mother said of her other four surviving children who were treated with castor oil and inhaled steroids and recovered.

β€œIt was her time on Earth,” the translator said the parents told her. β€œThey believe she’s better off where she is now.” β€œWe would absolutely not take the MMR,” the mother said in English, referring to the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination children typically receive before attending school. She said her stance on vaccination has not changed after her daughter’s death. β€œThe measles wasn’t that bad. They got over it pretty quickly,” the mother said of her other four surviving children who were treated with castor oil and inhaled steroids and recovered.

right, i mean, we kinda already know what the response is going to be, because it already happened in texas six months ago:
www.texastribune.org/2025/03/20/t...

04.09.2025 04:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
spam email selling active shooter accreditation for schools and daycares: "The only National Accreditation for the Safety and Security of Children, Teachers, Schools and Daycares in the United States.
β€œWe didn’t think it would happen here.”
We know that schools and daycares across the country are receiving little to no help when it comes to emergency protocols..."

spam email selling active shooter accreditation for schools and daycares: "The only National Accreditation for the Safety and Security of Children, Teachers, Schools and Daycares in the United States. β€œWe didn’t think it would happen here.” We know that schools and daycares across the country are receiving little to no help when it comes to emergency protocols..."

i hate it here.

29.08.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah, i think that's an insane take that's neatly captured by her refusal to call it X and acknowledge the platform is fundamentally different. I'm all for persuasion, but it's interesting (telling?) she doesn't seem to discuss the fact that journos are the ones that may be persuaded... to be nazis

24.08.2025 23:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

gah, *VIRALITY* not vitality! stupid autocorrect

24.08.2025 23:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter Studies suggest a growing interdependence between journalists and Twitter. What is behind this interdependence, and how does it manifest in news texts? We argue that social media platforms (and Twi...

see, for example: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

24.08.2025 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

and while i do agree that's what's happening here, i'd probably argue that the bigger problem is not necessarily the fact of context collapse (which, as "vitality" *can* actually be quite good for democracy i think!), but that mainstream journalists view Twitter as the whole world.

24.08.2025 23:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

for citational clarity: while i maybe popularized (?) it for PT, "context collapse" comes from @alicetiara.bsky.social and @zephoria.bsky.social's classic essay!

24.08.2025 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How Should We Study Multiple Platforms? Lessons from Deliberative Systems Theory Despite agreement that political communication research should move beyond single-platform studies, there is no existing consensus on precisely how to do so. What does it mean to study social media...

my new piece in political communication (part of @meredithpruden.bsky.social @jiyoun-suk.bsky.social @jolukito.bsky.social @yunkangyang.bsky.social & Wei Zhong's issue on multiple platforms!) is now out!

This one was tough to nail down; thankful to all who helped & would love to hear thoughts!

01.07.2025 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

the story today is of a profoundly low energy military parade being met with millions of americans in nationwide protests denouncing the dictatorial pretensions of the president

15.06.2025 01:11 β€” πŸ‘ 27045    πŸ” 4932    πŸ’¬ 209    πŸ“Œ 117

Bluesky won’t recreate peak Twitter. Twitter won’t recreate peak Twitter. Instagram isn’t going to go back to good Instagram. All this handwringing seems to yearning for a moment in social media history that isn’t ever coming back. Get used to it, figure out new things, build real community.

27.05.2025 00:47 β€” πŸ‘ 667    πŸ” 128    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 10

or the book version, designing for democracy, that I think complements your argument about "community" quite well! great study!

13.05.2025 23:51 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

this is SO nice to hear! thank you! going to try and carry this energy into some Monday morning writing....

12.05.2025 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

this was my exact first thought (in only the best way)

08.05.2025 21:31 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Da Pope: Chicago loses its mind over homegrown pontiff.

Within minutes of the announcement, Chicagoans had Photoshopped the new pope holding an Italian beef sandwich and made at least 50 MalΓΆrt jokes. buff.ly/hxnbaII

08.05.2025 21:24 β€” πŸ‘ 125    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 8

ah. yeah, that's pretty similar to conversations i had this semester within my grad course (though they were more enthusiastic about decentralization/protocols). like most great classes/interesting issues, i walked away with more questions than answers.

05.05.2025 21:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

ah, thanks stefan! this is great to hear. what (kind of) platforms were they thinking about? i'm starting a new project on decentralized stuff; i'm curious if it's similar!

05.05.2025 18:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

i've been finding it (uncharacteristically!) hard lately to find any point to writing about dem. & digital platforms given... everything, esp the blatant cynicism of tech ppl who use the language of democracy as cover for authoritarian inclinations. but these essays brought me back! i'm grateful!

05.05.2025 15:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Thinking democracy in a digital age - Contemporary Political Theory Contemporary Political Theory -

CPT just published a symposium on my book! huge thanks to Susan Bickford, @pollysigh.bsky.social, @nicolecurato.bsky.social, @jgastil.bsky.social, Victor Bruzzone, @jamesmuldoon.bsky.social for contributions that critique, stretch, & apply the book's argument in such generous & productive ways

05.05.2025 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2
A Case For Ethical and Transparent Research Experiments in the Public Interest - Coalition for Independent Technology Research On April 26, moderators of r/ChangeMyView, a community on Reddit dedicated to understanding the perspectives of others, revealed that academic researchers from the University of ZΓΌrich conducted a lar...

Really great to see the Coalition for Independent Tech Research weighing in on the unethical Reddit experiment.

independenttechresearch.org/a-case-for-e...

30.04.2025 23:12 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah, just absolutely delusional to be responding to a community clearly articulating the harm you've caused by saying "no harm here, this random committee says so" or "the findings we got are worth it" (πŸ™„)

a total, utter failure of professional ethics or, like, basic human decency

27.04.2025 00:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

right? also that the mods filed a complaint with the IRB, who then doubled down on "nah, it's fine no harm actually." and then for the researchers to say "see, IRB says it's cool" *while responding to an angry torrent of comments citing harm* is just unreal.

26.04.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

more good thoughts on this violation.

i have to wonder if researchers' willingness to treat reddit as simply data (& not people) is exacerbated by either/both the site's anonymity and, maybe more importantly, its reputation.

26.04.2025 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

this is so deeply messed up & i hope the research team is appropriately censured for it (if not, as it seems, by their IRB then by the rest of the academic communities they try to engage)

26.04.2025 22:48 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

@seejenspeak is following 20 prominent accounts