Excited to be presenting on time-varying synergy and redundancy in the brain (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...) at this workshop today at 11:00! Hope to see you there!
08.07.2025 07:32 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@popeme.bsky.social
Studying networks and neuroscience at Indiana University
Excited to be presenting on time-varying synergy and redundancy in the brain (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...) at this workshop today at 11:00! Hope to see you there!
08.07.2025 07:32 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you! I really enjoyed talking to everyone at TopoNets yesterday!
04.06.2025 05:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'll be here tomorrow-- if anyone in Bloomington wants a ride, DM me!
www.eventbrite.com/e/stand-up-f...
π¨ Acceptance Decisions Are In! π¨
Weβve finalized the acceptance decisions for the submissions received before the priority deadline. Make sure to check your inbox!
β¨ Weβre still accepting submissions on a rolling basis! Submit your abstract here: tinyurl.com/winsNetSci25
Finally, thanks to all the people who were involved with and supported me through this project: @thosvarley.bsky.social, @fasky.bsky.social , Maria Grazia Puxeddu, and Olaf Sporns. I'm always grateful for your friendship and guidance.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So to summarize: time-localized O-information shows different things than time-averaged O-information. Some subsets (those corresponding to canonical RSNs) are just information-rich. Both synergistic and redundant subsets are highly recurrent. And momentary z-score sign can help predict syn/red.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is cool also because it can provide a computational heuristic for finding these subsets. Got a subset thatβs all the same sign at a time point, but looking for synergy? Don't calculate O, just pick another subset. (HUGE caveat: may not generalize to non-Gaussian or even non-fMRI datasets.)
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Finally: if it's the same subsets... what is it about their activity that is different? At all subset sizes, synergistic subsets split the natural bipartition that is formed by binarizing the data: they have positive and negative z-scores. Redundant subsets prefer to have much more of one sign.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0We repeated this flavor of analysis for even larger subsets (up to size 75) by optimizing for the most synergistic and most redundant subset on each time point independently. We found very similar temporal structure marked by good recurrence.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But the triads have great recurrence structure. Synergistic and redundant triads both recur long periods of time after their initial occurrenceβthese may represent states that the brain is meaningfully returning to.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We exhaustively calculated the local O-information for all triads at each time point, to find the maximally synergistic and maximally redundant triads (one for each time point). As expected from the previous result, the same triads dominate both time series.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But interesting things happen in smaller subsets. The subsets with the most redundant, time-averaged O-information have BOTH the most redundant AND the most synergistic time points! They are just information-rich. This is highly unexpectedβbut will continue to be confirmed throughout the results.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0First, we treated the whole brain as one large interaction. Itβs essentially awash in redundancy all the time. Most participants never experience a whole-brain synergistic momentsβ¦ and if they do, those moments are mostly noise.
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The local O-information gives a temporally resolved measure of synergy/redundancy dominance: one value per time point. So for each set of brain regions, you can now obtain a time series instead of a single value. But, of course, how you choose to sample the interactions matters. So what did we do?
27.02.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Our work applying the local O-information to BOLD data was just accepted to a focus issue on Higher Order Brain Networks in JPhys Complexity!
doi.org/10.1088/2632...
Hereβs a quick thread, which boils down toβ¦ timescale really matters when youβre talking about synergy and redundancy in the brain!
π Weβre officially on Bluesky! π The Women in Network Science (WiNS) Society connects and supports network scientists who identify as underrepresented genders in the field. Follow us for updates on events, opportunities, and exciting research from our community!
#NetworkScience #WiNS
Three more days to apply to the WiNS satellite at NetSci 2025!
Come pitch your project to a multidisciplinary audience!
Website: sites.google.com/view/womenin...
Also! The symposium on higher-order interactions, chaired by @manishsaggar.bsky.social and @lordgrilo.bsky.social, was accepted.
Absolute must-attend if you're at OHBM 2025, with talks from: @popeme.bsky.social, @andreasantoro.bsky.social, and @novelli-leo.bsky.social!
@ohbmofficial.bsky.social