Too many laws passing without 'proper scrutiny', Geoffrey Palmer says
08.12.2025 00:15 — 👍 21 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 1@debtekawa-ao.bsky.social
Ngāti Porou. Kaitono PhD, kāore i te pāti kotahi. E ū ana ki Te Tiriti, te taupatupatu whai hua, me te ōritetanga. Kei te tohe kia whakapai ake te kāwanatanga. Ngā skeet putanga motuhake https://linktr.ee/debtekawa
Too many laws passing without 'proper scrutiny', Geoffrey Palmer says
08.12.2025 00:15 — 👍 21 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 1💜
07.12.2025 23:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0NZDF confirms medals for 85 Cook Islands WWII veterans after decades of denial
07.12.2025 23:00 — 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0Dates now on the record: Police Minister Mark Mitchell was told of a McSkimming complaint on Oct 14 - three weeks before the date he’s given publicly as when he first heard of concerns.
07.12.2025 18:25 — 👍 56 🔁 26 💬 7 📌 3Democracy is about voice and representation on multiple levels. Reducing it to representing our preferences (expressed occasionally by a single yes/no) diminishes our power as citizens, it doesn’t increase it.
07.12.2025 03:02 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Reminder: those diversity and inclusion clauses were also intended to ensure that no appointment outcome was predetermined and that recruitment processes are genuinely competitive.
07.12.2025 00:37 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The research suggests it can create pressure to proceed with an appointment despite reservations, and leave the final decision questionable because there is no genuine choice. Fascinating. Important for Aotearoa because the amendments to the Public Service lean on merit, and remove diversity.
07.12.2025 00:32 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0As I write about merit-based appointments today, I am noticing
how vulnerable a process is to individual candidate issues when a panel has minimal options.
A shortlist of only a few candidates raises genuine questions about whether all suitable candidates were considered and whether the process adequately identified the best person for the role.
07.12.2025 00:27 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0An observation on merit-based appointments: A wider field of qualified candidates provides more reference points for comparison and makes it easier to test selection criteria.
07.12.2025 00:27 — 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Read Nevil Gibson's review of 'Garrison World', in the NBR – 'a career best for Victoria University Professor Emerita Charlotte Macdonald'.
Full review: www.nbr.co.nz/book-review/so...
💜 Magic. Appreciative.
05.12.2025 18:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Our first AI/LLM election awaits us. Wonder what it will bring. Open to recommendations on who to follow so I can adequately judge the quality of the AI/LLM party policies on offer.
05.12.2025 18:20 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Sound of the AI bubble going pop pop. On a related note, hard to know whether our policy advisory system is on top of this: what with budgets assuming in productivity savings, and those charged with overseeing those assumptions, knee deep in the technology.
05.12.2025 18:18 — 👍 14 🔁 5 💬 2 📌 0Today's block words *FIFA* *soccer* *worldcup* Easy. Carry on.
05.12.2025 18:11 — 👍 11 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1And if that is truly all they do - produce content - then the case for their salaries, their privileges, and authority is difficult to sustain. In fact, I know some nztiktokers who would do that job really well.
05.12.2025 02:07 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Also, to frame this as a labour market question, cause only the staffer loses, is to say it is alright for MPs to be content producers rather than representatives who exercise judgement on our behalf.
05.12.2025 02:06 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Successful medical drone delivery could offer faster healthcare access for remote communities
04.12.2025 23:00 — 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0No, I am not being a dick. What we are risking is performative democracy. The appearance of debate, not the substantive work of wrestling with competing interests and difficult trade-offs. You cannot outsource those to rhetorical flourish machines.
04.12.2025 23:00 — 👍 17 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0And .... I thought the purpose of parliamentary deliberation was to exercise judgment on behalf of one's electorate, who knew it was to delegate cognitive labour to an LLM. Yet, here we are.
04.12.2025 22:56 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 2 📌 0I expect some work within the party (and other political parties) on the place of AI in their work. Given that LLMs cannot, by definition, analyse documents I would take a cautionary approach.
04.12.2025 22:50 — 👍 16 🔁 6 💬 2 📌 0willie jack from rez dogs looking disturbed
Pantone: this year’s color is Cloud Dancer white
Natives:
@Ilyndseybelle this is what 50 bucks means to a small business. $50 is nothing to a billion dollar company. start shopping small @meownikaa whoever just placed a $50+ order in my shop, thank you so much that literally just paid for half of my groceries tomorrow
Shopping small is meaningful!
29.11.2025 22:52 — 👍 5947 🔁 2507 💬 12 📌 141Figure 1: The important dimensions of CAILs across research and education; clockwise from 12 o’clock: Con- ceptual Clarity is the idea that terms should refer. Critical Thinking is deep engagement with the relationships between statements about the world. Decoloniality is the process of de-centring and addressing dominant harmful views and practices. Respecting Expertise is the epistemic compact between professionals and society. Slow Science is a disposition towards preferring psychologically, techno-socially, and epistemically healthy practices. The lines between dimensions represent how they are interwoven both directly and indirectly.
New preprint! @marentierra.bsky.social @irisvanrooij.bsky.social & I have been working on what CAIL means to showcase & propagate the idea of thinking very differently to tech industry norms on "artificial intelligence"
Towards Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
1/
Noting, of course, Mulgan's call out in 2012 that officials had vacated the space. Ends x
03.12.2025 19:33 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I am going to offer a hypothesis that narrow partisan agendas are derailing delivery because they lack evidence and the knowledge of what implementation actually takes.
03.12.2025 19:32 — 👍 11 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0I don't know about you, but I would rather we took our heads out of the sand, and rather than moaning about who advises the government, what advice is provided, when and how, we should start to ask what sort of pluralistic advice system we want.
03.12.2025 19:30 — 👍 10 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Governments have increasingly demanded contestability and partisan input for several decades, often sidelining traditional public service advice in favour of external consultants, ministerial advisers, and partisan sources.
03.12.2025 19:29 — 👍 9 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0