Pinesnake

I have answered this, multiple times. They were all AFAB. Do you need help with reading comprehension?

I wonder if her views of enby people have changed

And I have already stated what sex is. You don’t want to accept it, fine. You’re wrong, but you are free to disagree with me.
And this has everything to do with gender when you are erroneously conflating sex with gender.

You do understand that gender =/= sex, right?

@dissonancepod.bsky.social it seems the guys will be pleasantly surprised by this guy again. I think he really has exceeded their expectations

Nothing says all 3 are female but all 3 are AFAB.
Only one of these is able to make any affirmation one way or the other, the other 2 will remain AFAB as they cannot speak for themselves.

I’m assuming you want me to say they have sexual reproductive organs *TYPICALLY* associated with the sex of female, but their reproductive organs does not dictate what sex they are.

The decision is not a social decision. Not having children is in no way anything to do with society

You are making this determination based on being AFAB. Sex is far more complicated than what is between someone’s legs.

I have 4 children thank you very much, however my partner does not and it in no way affects her social status or impact upon society.
Whether someone does or does not have children is in no way a social decision

How can no change in my circumstances change my entire interaction with society? Do you realise how ridiculous your statement is?

What is between your legs does not dictate what sex you are, those are typical sex characteristics and is generally what is used to determine as assigned gender at birth. Sex and gender are not synonyms.

Is in no way a social decision and in no way does one’s personal choice impact society in any way, shape, or form. To claim otherwise is to make assumptions about someone’s worth to society.

Swyer Syndrome is someone who has XY chromosomes, typically something that denotes they are male but also develops a vagina, womb, fallopian tubes and under developed ovaries. They often require medical assistance to start puberty and are not often capable of producing eggs.
Not having children…

Do you mean Swyer syndrome? It’s pretty disturbing you seem to be saying that a persons worth is directly associated with them having children, as if that must be the default and the assumption everyone must make.

Stop Donald Trump from Addressing the UK Parliament Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?

If people sign this petition it will let parliament know the British people do not support what is happening in the US to too many innocent people.

chng.it/fmv5Z52KqK

Stop Donald Trump from Addressing the UK Parliament Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?

Do we really want someone who violates the US constitution, abuses women, incites insurrections, has been found guilty of multiple felonies, steals from charities, and a whole range of other despicable things to speak in parliament?

Lindsay Hoyle has the authority to stop it happening...

Nor is it immutable

Ok, that one’s on me.

And would like to hazard a guess at what those books contained? Ideas on how to effectively mortify the flesh.
If you’d like to engage in apologetics, please don’t bother with me.

Not just analgesics, but also medication that could have saved people’s lives such as antibiotics, that is unless they converted to her faith voluntarily.

I doubt it as that particular Teresa is known for hallucinating and not any great works.
However the Teresa of Calcutta is wrongfully known as someone who cared for the sick and dying.
Plus, when considering the others in that list (such as Dr MLK Jr), it is more likely to be a recent person.

Theresa wasn’t a great aspect of Christianity. She tortured people in their final days by refusing them access to healthcare unless they converted to Christianity.
If they didn’t voluntarily convert to Christianity, she did it done without their consent, violating their own beliefs in the process

@noahlugeons.bsky.social is your dad?!

Technically this is true. There’s laws to reverse the apartheid laws and then some to ensure discrimination doesn’t take hold again

When I buy a thing (music, films, games, books, etc) I want to own a physical copy of it and not just a digital form.
Also, I don’t want a subscription that I have to keep paying without end, I want to buy the product outright.

It seems to me that not “selling out” is only obtainable by a small % of people, ie those that can afford to be strict about their ethical positions.
If I worked for someone like chick fil a, chances are I can’t afford to just quit my job without something lined up already on ethical grounds.

Most of the EU nations have bent over backwards to make it easier for people to get residency (Malta is fill in a simple form and pay a small admin fee), whereas we have made it almost impossible without a lawyer.
It’s truly ridiculous

@criticalcupcake.bsky.social it’s legal to end this madness by any means, right?

Well, as Reform UK is registered as a limited company and not a political party, whoever Nigel Farage (the sole shareholder) decides is the leader.
So much for democracy 🤷‍♂️