Manufacturing jobs fall as Pres. Trump’s cost-raising policies (tariffs on inputs & deportations of workers) begin to work as expected 🤷♂️
02.08.2025 06:05 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0@baldwinre.bsky.social
Prof of Int’l Econ @IMD_Bschool; Founder & Editor-in-Chief @VoxEU; NonRes Fellow @PIIE Books:The Globotics Upheaval 2019, The Great Upheaval 2016. MIT Econ PhD
Manufacturing jobs fall as Pres. Trump’s cost-raising policies (tariffs on inputs & deportations of workers) begin to work as expected 🤷♂️
02.08.2025 06:05 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0Price hikes aren’t the only way to pass on the tariffs to American consumers 👇
>Levi Strauss will limit items for holiday shopping season
• Limiting selection should mitigate tariff costs, protect margins
• Strategy has been used by other brands including Hasbro, Nike
.📣 @ChrisGiles_
👉 “there was a 16 per cent drop in services exports to the EU in sectors where Brexit imposed new trade frictions “
✍️ @rbrtrmstrng
“Ninety deals in 90, no wait, 113 days, and we’re serious this time”
👉 The deadline, to absolutely no one’s surprise, was no deadline at all.
Talking my eBook "The Great Trade Hack" on CNN International!
video.snapstream.net/Play/1Cje19... @IMD_Bschool @cepr_org
This is why markets look through Trump‘s tariff announcements 🎩 @martinwolf_
09.07.2025 08:24 — 👍 12 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Today is TACO Tuesday!
👉 As predicted in June, Trump chickened out (he lowered tariff rates and postponed his postponement)!
👉GDP growth slowly, inflation rising. He couldn't risk carrying through with his 2 April 2025 tariffs.
Do you think Donald Trump views yesterday tiff announcements as a huge success?
08.07.2025 12:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why did President Trump chicken out yesterday on the deadline (pushed to 1 August) and on the rates (substantially reduced)?
👉 Because tariffs are pushing up retail prices; that can't be good for his base.
New video and discussion - must watch!
Richard Baldwin explores his new e-book, The Great Trade Hack: How Trump’s 2025 Tariff Blitz Fails and the World Moves On @piie.com @cepr.org @baldwinre.bsky.social
www.piie.com/events/2025/...
👉Peter Navarro is a protectionist, anti-China extremist but has no formal power.
👉Economist Hassett (NEC Director) a professor who was a moderate voice on trade in Trump I.
Miran (CEA Chair) is a Fin'l mkts guy who worked for Mnuchin in Trump I (the ultimate moderating voice in Trump I).
👉2 billionaire Fin'l Mkt guys (Bessent, Lutnik)
👉1 billionaire globalist with close biz ties to China.
👉Jamieson Greer was Chief of Staff to nationalist Lighthizer but he's young and a trade lawyer (usually don't push policy personally).
Trump trade advisors super MAGA! (not).
➡️Apart from Navarro, all more moderate on trade than Trump himself.
Trade nerds! Famous 1976 handwritten paper where Victor Norman anticipates the new trade theory, esp. Helpman-Krugman Heckscher-Ohlin-Krugman fusion. He gave it to me in October 1997 in Bergen.
See full story (amazing) in my Factful Friday from 4 October 2024 lnkd.in/e5Buz3WU
Or just the "last advisor in the room" approach to foreign policy? His tariff numbers seem to come from a random number generator, so why not his foreign policy?
22.12.2024 09:25 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0This @baldwinre.bsky.social post is worth reading for those of us thinking about what the 'geopolitical' or 'geoeconomic' turn in international (trade) policy means — and how we can not only understand it but also consider the source of the field's established ideas. www.linkedin.com/posts/richar...
08.01.2025 09:05 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Richard Baldwin is on Bluesky.
Follow him at
@baldwinre.bsky.social
YOU DON’T SAY. “A party that had lined up behind Trump’s ‘America First’ policy agenda to end wars, not start them, was also willing to support his expansionist musings.” www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
13.01.2025 01:10 — 👍 110 🔁 24 💬 9 📌 2A lot to chew on in this issue of AEJ: Applied: #econsky
13.01.2025 04:05 — 👍 16 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1A propos of everything: My book is called The Tech Coup, How To Save Democracy From Silicon Valley ↘️ bookshop.org/p/books/the-...
08.01.2025 13:04 — 👍 71 🔁 25 💬 5 📌 2You ask a lot of questions, and they're always good ones 😉
13.01.2025 13:28 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0In the waning days of the Biden administration, I took one of my last opportunities to comment on U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine Tai's trade policy thoughts (also, I tried to lure her into posting on the IELP blog -- we'll see if she takes me up on it!).
13.01.2025 13:18 — 👍 7 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 1must read
13.01.2025 13:20 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0Read a couple of the news pieces on UK AI plans which leave me none the wiser about what is actually going to be done, so I guess it will all be in the implementation - but in various fields through my career I've always been concerned by something that can't be easily described.
13.01.2025 08:48 — 👍 203 🔁 28 💬 25 📌 2Why Trump tariffs will harm US industrial competitiveness
👉Factful Friday rerun!
US final good tariffs protect final goods firms but tariffs inputs harm them.
🔗https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trumps-tariffs-china-harm-us-manufacturing-richard-baldwin-pmmte/?trackingId=Pmct8VMqME8F24k%2F2iz2Sg%3D%3D
Trade nerds! Famous 1976 handwritten paper where Victor Norman anticipates the new trade theory, esp. Helpman-Krugman Heckscher-Ohlin-Krugman fusion. He gave it to me in October 1997 in Bergen.
See full story (amazing) in my Factful Friday from 4 October 2024 lnkd.in/e5Buz3WU
Or just the "last advisor in the room" approach to foreign policy? His tariff numbers seem to come from a random number generator, so why not his foreign policy?
22.12.2024 09:25 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0