This reeks of "let them eat cake" vibes
04.12.2025 20:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@eclecticbella.bsky.social
This reeks of "let them eat cake" vibes
04.12.2025 20:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh it got the state senate to come back on the 8th, but it hasn't won a majority in support of passing it. Sen. Kyke Walker is a no vote. Sen. Mike Bohack is a no, Sen. Jean Leising is a no, Sen. Greg Goode is a no, Sen. Rodric Bray is a no, at least 6 other Repub senators are a no.
01.12.2025 22:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Threats of swatting have had the reverse impact.
01.12.2025 21:20 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No. Read the article.
01.12.2025 17:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Indiana Senate Republicans have repeatedly insisted they donβt have the votes to pass a gerrymander.
The Indiana House Republicans passed the draft map. The state senate isn't backing it.
Indiana Senate Republicans have repeatedly insisted they donβt have the votes to pass a gerrymander.
It's the Indiana House Republicans that passed the draft map.
Awww.. he can resign then if he's overworked
28.11.2025 04:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0None of them would have created a situation where that question would need to be asked.
28.11.2025 04:07 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm curious how this plays out since greenlit the racial gerrymandering in North Carolina
27.11.2025 18:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0News of their deaths is misreported. They are in critical condition. Not deceased
26.11.2025 22:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The courtβs ruling leans heavily on a U.S. Supreme Court decision β also from North Carolina β that bars federal courts from reviewing partisan gerrymandering, leaving Black voters with virtually no federal remedy against extreme, politically engineered maps.
26.11.2025 22:53 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0.....why not just recall Johnson as Speaker then, they did it to Kevin.
24.11.2025 22:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Revoking tax exempt status from a non profit would kill many of them since they would now be required to pay taxes on the income they receive as well as facing state level consequences
24.11.2025 21:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Did you bother to go to his campaign page?
24.11.2025 08:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I didn't miss the point. I saw just another example of someone being interested in what was said, but no effort to take that was being said and find out what they wanted. I saw someone expecting another person to Google "House votes on resolution..."
21.11.2025 23:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's easy to look up. It's also a non-binding resolution
21.11.2025 19:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thousands of people in rural areas, the Republican base, have no options when it comes to healthcare.
19.11.2025 14:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Lol... that only works when people have options. Way to many people live in locations where they only have ONE option that is less than an hour away. Even more people have to drive over an hour for healthcare
19.11.2025 14:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And yet we hound anyone that takes money from bad people; demand politicians return campaign funds etc.
19.11.2025 05:15 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It was texts. The texts are part of the Epstien files and they've been made public by the House Republicans on the oversight committee. Part of their "distract everyone from Trump's involvement" plan.
19.11.2025 05:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They are extremely dangerous idiots.
19.11.2025 05:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So far, a handful of republican controlled states have said. Nope we're not doing it.
19.11.2025 02:04 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0That been drawn based on race. Bondi's own DOJ wrote that official letter, sent to Texas, directing the state to redraw districts using race as the determination. The districts, as they stood, gave non white voters an advantage and had to be reversed.
19.11.2025 02:03 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0But CA explicitly declared their redistricting is based solely on protecting partisan representation,the thing SCOTUS said was okay when North Carolina said that was why THEY redraw districts. Same with Florida. NC and FL both got sued, with the reason being it eliminated districts
19.11.2025 02:03 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 019 states are under GOP control when it comes to Congressional maps.
19.11.2025 01:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Nope. CA explicitly stated in the language for Proposition 50 that their redistricting is to protect partisan representation in Congress.
19.11.2025 01:38 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0I think you're stuck on the position of rewarding behavior you agree with even though the person that did it would glady throw you in the trash or jail the next day. Ask yourself why MTG is taking this stance? She was one of the biggest supporters of Pizzagate.
19.11.2025 01:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0SCOTUS themselves ruled last year partisan maps are legal and allowed, courts can not intervene. The DOJ fucked up when they sent thst letter calling for districts based on race.
19.11.2025 01:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Maybe, most likely not. SCOTUS is ready to strike down districts drawn based on race, thereby effectively killing the VRA. SCOTUS has already ruled courts can't block districts from being partisan gerrymandering
19.11.2025 01:28 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Except the SCOTUS is currently hearing a case arguing to limit race based districts and the conservative majority has strongly singled they are in support of striking diwn maps drawn on race. The DOJ letter explicitly called on Texas to redraw districts based on race.
19.11.2025 01:23 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0