Abster's Avatar

Abster

@abbystuller.bsky.social

2,594 Followers  |  345 Following  |  440 Posts  |  Joined: 15.11.2024  |  2.2399

Latest posts by abbystuller.bsky.social on Bluesky

Military pay is guaranteed through Nov. 15 at least.

31.10.2025 00:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They will be paid through the shutdown. I can give you a source, if you want, but I don't know what sources you trust. You should choose your own source and check. Noem stated they were 'essential' and would be paid throughout.

30.10.2025 23:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Money is being spent to keep the lights on. Federal funds go to more than just paychecks. And some paychecks, like military, border patrol, and federal police are still being paid out. (We are really getting somewhere now. Very exciting! No need to bring up the off-topic CR at this point.)

30.10.2025 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Money is clearly being spent, though. The federal government is still functioning, just paychecks have temporarily stopped for many workers and some other things have been shut down. There is still a lot being funded. You can see that, right? Like the FAA won't just stop its work on November 1.

30.10.2025 23:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Who is directing it to be spent illegally?

30.10.2025 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Just so I understand, are you saying that you believe no federal funds will be spent after November 1?

30.10.2025 23:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Lots of federal funds are still being spent. You would agree with that statement, right?

30.10.2025 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Do you actually believe that? Are you arguing in good faith?

30.10.2025 23:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The USDA has an emergency contingency fund. It can use this and is choosing not to understand orders from the president. Were you aware of that?

30.10.2025 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You should read up on this. There is money allocated for SNAP already. The CR stalemate is not relevant.

30.10.2025 21:48 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

How is none of it going to get done? A lot of it is already done in other cities. Are you arguing in good faith?

29.10.2025 19:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Oh yeah, those are totally comparable. Seriously, he has plans laid out and you may think they are unrealistic in totality, but a lot of people will be satisfied if they are only partly achieved. It's a lazy analogy to compare physical or scientific problems to political or economic ones.

29.10.2025 16:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is it a good goal, though?

29.10.2025 11:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think those jobs will come back. But I am sorry that it may take too long for some people. I hope you are able to pay the bills with something you like okay until you can get back to it.

29.10.2025 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, exactly! It's actually the best it will ever be right now.

28.10.2025 10:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a ridiculous plan also! It requires a continuous flow of original work to imitate or it's useless. But the plan is for it to make original work non-profitable. So it will have nothing worthwhile to imitate and will devolve to a boring sameness. Even if it goes perfectly it will be awful.

28.10.2025 02:48 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You nailed this! And once you see things through this lens, virtually every position they have is consistent with it. It makes sense of beliefs they hold that are otherwise seemingly inconsistent with each other.

27.10.2025 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It could, but I am not seeing recent poll movement or anything narrative-changing.

26.10.2025 23:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's not power. It's bullying. Real power is quiet and confident.

26.10.2025 23:48 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The people who feel that way only think giving to certain charities is noble. They usually only like charities that extract a promise of religious belief from the recipient.

26.10.2025 19:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Does it? What am I missing when I look at the polls?

26.10.2025 09:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why?

26.10.2025 09:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, a sixth grade girl somewhere in a state they will never visit isn't getting to play on a volleyball team, so they can rest easy tonight.

26.10.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But they don't know the territory!

25.10.2025 13:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just realized I was very late to this thread and everyone else already made this point. So not crazy.

24.10.2025 12:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think that advertisers prefer discrete population sets over continuous ones. They break up the markets arbitrarily so they can sell targeted campaigns to companies. Crazy, conspiracy theory? Maybe.

24.10.2025 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, that is true. But it is also strange that the dates aren't prominently included by the pollsters in any of their information. That's like a basic rule of political polling.

24.10.2025 11:41 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why are the dates the poll data collected not included? October 1 is very different from October 20 in this race.

24.10.2025 11:13 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Plus it's a stupid philosophy to begin with. They are self-shunning. Why would anyone purposely take themselves out of enjoying the main strengths of humanity, community and cooperation?

23.10.2025 21:16 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you are on the right, criticism from someone above your status, is assumed to be deserved. From someone below you, just ignore or mock it. The left doesn't have everyone lined up like that, so criticism is considered on its merits. That's too painful for a surprisingly large number of people.

22.10.2025 10:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@abbystuller is following 20 prominent accounts