Clem Tillier's Avatar

Clem Tillier

@ctillier.bsky.social

eclectic interests - space science & tech, SF Bay Area transit, HSR, anything on rails πŸš„ or on a rocket πŸš€

764 Followers  |  466 Following  |  666 Posts  |  Joined: 09.10.2023  |  2.1727

Latest posts by ctillier.bsky.social on Bluesky

Stuttgart

13.02.2026 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

accidentally shipped to the wrong Washington

10.02.2026 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably needs a good rail grinding. Extra howl is from corrugation of the rail surface.

05.02.2026 03:11 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Cajon Pass is where electric locomotives paired with existing diesels as slugs (prime mover off) would excel.

05.02.2026 03:02 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Another way of thinking about this is uphill trains can be mostly powered by downhill trains.

05.02.2026 02:59 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Same with step-free level boarding, its primary benefit is not to improve accessibility.

It is to enable shorter station dwells which reduces travel time and thereby … ditto

04.02.2026 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why does the unit number appear twice? Is this some weird number board fetish?

04.02.2026 02:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Masked Assassins Guild of America was right there

28.01.2026 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

An EV will help you avoid issues like having spark plugs

26.01.2026 04:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

How to identify American fascists as stated by our own US government in March of 1945.

16.01.2026 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 92    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2

β€œIt’s expensive to be poor”

17.01.2026 01:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

This is the way

10.01.2026 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Tea is in the board brief www.caltrain.com/media/36365/...

06.01.2026 04:48 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You are such a clazzik

06.01.2026 04:36 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whoa we’re bombing Venezuepstein!

03.01.2026 07:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hard to believe a FIFA Peace Prize laureate would do this.

03.01.2026 06:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1822    πŸ” 358    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 8

Why wouldn’t it make sense at $250k?

03.01.2026 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But that’s okay, the FDR memory chips will tell the story of what happened, however unlikely it was!

02.01.2026 15:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To this I can only say that the best-engineered redundancy schemes can still be undone by an unanticipated common mode failure. The physical layout and routing of 777 wire harnessing is not on the public internet (for good reason!) which makes β€œresearching” this nigh impossible to someone like me.

02.01.2026 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right. So under those hypothetical circumstances, it might make sense to fly for several hours to troubleshoot, although I can’t explain the final destination. (I’ve enjoyed this exchange!)

02.01.2026 07:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Would this be something you rush to try for the first time with over 200 souls on board? Or would you want to take extra time to study the problem, away from a busy airspace in which you can no longer communicate?

02.01.2026 06:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No throttle control might be a bigger problem than no radio (also in the pedestal, by the way) … initial turn is consistent with trying to reach closest airfield, and then possible struggle to figure out how to descend into Penang. But how, with engines stuck at cruise?

02.01.2026 06:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Again, speculating, if the (redundant) wiring routed from the throttle quadrant in the pedestal down to the EE bay is severed, you can fly the plane but you probably lose any control of the engines, which continue at last throttle setting until fuel exhaustion.

02.01.2026 05:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We do know that if a malfunction occurred, its effect could not have been so severe as to make the plane impossible to control. A pilot obviously did fly mh370 for a long while.

02.01.2026 05:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Fascinating read, thank you

02.01.2026 05:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The differential overpressure from a burst bottle would likely cause structural failure of cockpit floor, which probably contains important wire harnesses running between pedestal and EE bay. What would happen if you severed those connections?

02.01.2026 03:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t know enough about the physical layout of B777 avionics and harnessing (few people do, and certainly not pilots) but I suspect there might be a physically reasonable explanation for how a COPV failure leads to loss of ADS-B and other systems located in cockpit pedestal

02.01.2026 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

That timing is indeed a bit odd, but hardly a smoking gun. I don’t have a definite answer, but if a COPV failed on the first flight cycle after a refill, not long after top of climb, would that be odd timing?

02.01.2026 02:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When those memory chips are retrieved from the FDR, things will become obvious in hindsight. The difficulty we have today with foresight of a malfunctions is that complex systems can fail in complex ways.

01.01.2026 23:20 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s right, malfunctions are very difficult to think about, but that difficulty shouldn’t let us become cognitively biased towards easier explanations like hijacking. Something being difficult to conceive doesn’t make it less likely… or less obvious when hindsight becomes available. Occam fails!

01.01.2026 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@ctillier is following 20 prominent accounts