Superb graphics in this
www.wsj.com/economy/jobs...
@ryandedwards.bsky.social
Health Economics, Macro, Labor, Demography @UCSF and @UCBerkeley @berkeleyecon Former faculty @CUNY and @NBERpubs. 2002 Econ Ph.D. & Oakland fan. He/him
Superb graphics in this
www.wsj.com/economy/jobs...
Nancy Mace interviewed on NPR sounding like a well informed and wise person about the Epstein files
12.02.2026 16:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Aw man, what a total bummer. You were the best, Dawson!! I want yore life
11.02.2026 19:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It’s hard to tell, and that’s the point. It sounds like ICE is in public areas of medical centers, or with hospitalized detainees, which are lawful acts.
But terrorizing the health workforce by asking immigration status is unnecessary. It’s like checking teachers
www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...
While independent bookstores are giving out free whistles, hosting protest sign making events, and donating proceeds to mutual aid, Amazon is *checks notes* providing technology that assists ICE in their terrorizing of communities.
Independent bookstores deserve your support. Amazon does not.
Grand Obtuse Pugilists
07.02.2026 03:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“Republicans who want every illegal worker deported cite the rule of law, but they also decline to allow legal pathways to work in the U.S. There are human and economic costs to all this”
www.wsj.com/opinion/flor...
I really miss Brooks and Capehart. Also Shields and Brooks. And Shields and Gigot. And Gergen and Shields
07.02.2026 03:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My manuscript "The Economics of Noncompete Clauses" is now out in the Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Few topics have garnered more debate and policy attention over the last few years. This article brings us up to speed on the debate and the current answers.
pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/...
Disturbing chart. More than forty years ago, I completed an undergrad degree in modern history and economics. Still think that combination was the greatest education/preparation to understand (and in my case write about) the world.
05.02.2026 05:32 — 👍 16 🔁 4 💬 4 📌 0The notion that “Bluey” could ever be described with a political word like “conservative” reveals much more about the critic than the show
Kindness, caring, and growing up aren’t political at all. They’re eternal
www.wsj.com/opinion/free...
A table. The columns are United States, Australia, France The rows are: Drinking while pregnant (Will Kill Baby, Don't Overdo It, Actively Good for You and Probably Baby) Smoking while Pregnant (We're Arresting You Now, Don't Be Stupid, Eh, Don't Overdo It) Exercising while Pregnant (Pretty Good for You, Great For You, Will Kill You and Baby) Being Near a Cat While Pregnant (Wash Your Hands, Why is This On The List?, Most Dangerous Thing You Can Do)
this @kjhealy.co banger came up in Facebook memories and it deserves to live here too
04.02.2026 01:00 — 👍 54 🔁 10 💬 0 📌 1It’s good to keep your word
www.wsj.com/economy/cent...
"On December 2, 1783, then-Commander-in-Chief George Washington penned: “America is open to receive not only the Opulent & respected Stranger, but the oppressed & persecuted of all Nations & Religions.”1 More than two centuries later, Congress reaffirmed President Washington’s vision by establishing the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (TPS statute). It provides humanitarian relief to foreign nationals in the United States who come from disaster-stricken countries. It also brings in substantial revenue, with TPS holders generating $5.2 billion in taxes annually. See Part VI. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem has a different take. [screenshot of tweet].
So says the official responsible for overseeing the TPS program. And one of those (her word) “damn” countries is Haiti. Relevant here, three days before making the above post, Secretary Noem announced she would terminate Haiti’s TPS designation as of February 3, 2026. See 90 Fed. Reg. 54733 (Nov. 28, 2025) (Termination). Plaintiffs are five Haitian TPS holders. They are not, it emerges, “killers, leeches, or entitlement junkies.” They are instead: Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, a neuroscientist researching Alzheimer’s disease, Dkt. 90 (Second Am. Compl. (SAC)) ¶ 1; Rudolph Civil, a software engineer at a national bank, id. ¶ 2; Marlene Gail Noble, a laboratory assistant in a toxicology department, id. ¶ 3; Marica Merline Laguerre, a college economics major, id. ¶ 4; and Vilbrun Dorsainvil, a full-time registered nurse, id. ¶ 5. They claim that Secretary Noem’s decision violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2), and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Government counters that the Court does not have jurisdiction, and, in any case, the Secretary did not violate the law. Plaintiffs seek to stay the Secretary’s decision under 5 U.S.C. § 705 pending the outcome of this litigation. See Dkt. 81 (§ 705 Mot.). To decide their motion, the Court considers first whether it has jurisdiction. It does. See Part II. It then considers: whether Plaintiffs have a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; whether they will be irreparably harmed absent a stay; and whether a merged balance of the equities and public interest analysis favors a stay. See Part III. Each element favors Plaintiffs. See Parts IV, V, and VI. Plaintiffs charge that Secretary Noem preordained her termination decision and did so because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants. This seems substantially likely. Secretary Noem
has terminated every TPS country designation to have reached her desk—twelve countries up, twelve countries down. See Section IV.A.2. Her conclusion that Haiti (a majority nonwhite country) faces merely “concerning” conditions cannot be squared with the “perfect storm of suffering” and “staggering” “humanitarian toll” described in page-after-page of the Certified Administrative Record (CAR). See Section IV.A.3.a. She ignored Congress’s requirement that she “review the conditions” in Haiti only “after” consulting “with appropriate agencies.” 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3)(A); see Section IV.A.1. Indeed, she did not consult other agencies at all. See id. Her “national interest” analysis focuses on Haitians outside the United States or here illegally, ignoring that Haitian TPS holders already live here, and legally so. See Section IV.A.3.b. And though she states that the analysis must include “economic considerations,” she ignores altogether the billions Haitian TPS holders contribute to the economy. See id. The Government’s primary response is that the TPS statute gives the Secretary unbounded discretion to make whatever determination she wants, any way she wants. And, yes, the statute does grant her some discretion. But not unbounded discretion. To the contrary, Congress passed the TPS statute to standardize the then ad hoc temporary protection system—to replace executive whim with statutory predictability. See Section I.A. As to irreparable harm, the Government contends that, at most, the harms to Haitian TPS holders are speculative. But the Department of State (State) warns [screenshot]
Dkt. 100 (§ 705 Reply) at 20–21.4 “Do not travel to Haiti for any reason” does not exactly scream, as Secretary Noem concluded, suitable for return. And so, the Government studiously does not argue that Plaintiffs will suffer no harm if removed to Haiti. Instead, it argues Plaintiffs will not certainly suffer irreparable harm because DHS might not remove them. But this fails to take Secretary Noem at her word: “WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.” See Section IV.B.2.b. Finally, the balance of equities and public interest favor a stay. The Government does not cite any reason termination must occur post haste. Secretary Noem complains of strains unlawful immigrants place on our immigration-enforcement system. Her answer? Turn 352,959 lawful immigrants into unlawful immigrants overnight. She complains of strains to our economy. Her answer? Turn employed lawful immigrants who contribute billions in taxes into the legally unemployable. She complains of strains to our healthcare system. Her answer? Turn the insured into the uninsured. This approach is many things—in the public interest is not one of them. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for a Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705, Dkt. 81.
Even if you don't have time to read all 83 pages of Judge Reyes's opinion barring the Trump administration from rescinding Temporary Protected Status for 350,000+ Haitians, please at least check out the four-page introduction.
It's a tour de force:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
5 papers from the AEA Annual Meeting
www.npr.org/sections/pla...
Mankiw: Back from the abyss
gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2026/01/cong...
The argument that tariffs only increase prices (once) and not inflation strikes me as extremely dumb given the experience of the oil shocks of the 1970s
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/31/o...
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN
31.01.2026 17:39 — 👍 41 🔁 9 💬 3 📌 0“…you can deal with far more dangerous situations with far less force than we’re seeing. I know this. I’ve seen this with my own eyes, and when you see these videos and you have experience dealing with more dangerous situations, trust me, it’s more shocking.”
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/31/o...
And Streets is in D. Perfect key, just lays well for most of us
31.01.2026 17:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0State attorneys general, get those statements. File those lawsuits. RNs would probably line up volunteering to testify against ICE
31.01.2026 17:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0❤️
30.01.2026 19:57 — 👍 28026 🔁 9230 💬 363 📌 762Streets of Minneapolis speak for themselves
Don’t miss Tom Joad
Now Tom said,
“Ma, wherever there's a cop beating a guy
Wherever a hungry newborn baby cries
Where there's a fight against the blood and hatred in the air
Look for me, Mom, I'll be there”
I’m sorry but it’s appalling to me that Justice Alito would repeat the false claim in late December after DOJ filed to dismiss with prejudice in November
He’s got plenty of law clerks to fact check but apparently has little interest in facts
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/29/o...
“The bureau’s bloody-mindedness even after Mr. Guan’s case was widely publicized is further proof that DHS needs new leadership.”
www.wsj.com/opinion/guan...
Jay Powell just described the Supreme Court case about whether Trump can fire Lisa Cook as "perhaps the most important legal case in the Fed's 113 year history."
28.01.2026 20:05 — 👍 974 🔁 219 💬 18 📌 4Screenshot of TruthSocial post by President Trump complaining that Mayor Frey won't enforce federal immigration law, and calling it a "very serious violation of the Law."
In Printz v. United States, #SCOTUS held that the Constitution bars the federal government from forcing or otherwise compelling local or state governments to enforce federal law.
The liberal squish who wrote the majority opinion in that case? Justice Antonin Scalia:
tile.loc.gov/storage-serv...
I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.
Stay free
“So Much For the Mid-Terms” is my favorite nugget
www.wsj.com/health/healt...