Right?? Like was anyone ever saying that it wasnโt? Always felt like such bad faith arguments to me
10.10.2025 22:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@slufaq.bsky.social
Right?? Like was anyone ever saying that it wasnโt? Always felt like such bad faith arguments to me
10.10.2025 22:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0But regardless Iโve seen enough to make it clear to me that vulgar auteurism will not *be* vindicated, but in fact has already *been* vindicated, for a while honestly. Even if you did take issue with the way people talked about the films, the films themselves remain their own justification
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Granted there are also those whose careers are basically dead (Neveldine/Taylor, Rob Zombie). And certain directors who have achieved popular success you can still argue against; Iโve never been totally sold on Snyder, and JCS seems to have pretty much sacrificed any artistic integrity he had
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Collet-Serra made a film last year thatโs in the 10 most-watched Netflix films of all time. If we count Lucas, the prequels have also been completely embraced by the younger generation. Shyamalan remains controversial, but even he is far from the joke he was 10 years ago
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Mann and the Wachowskis both had a film in the last S&S list. Ferrara and Verhoeven make European arthouse movies. Bayโs last movie was โCertified Freshโ on RT. Snyder, though still polarizing, has one of the largest cult followings of any current director
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0In fact, the reason why PWSA is still the poster child for VA if anyone ever brings it up is because heโs one of the *only* major VA-adjacent directors who is still disreputable. I mean, look at the others
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0People balked at the name and some of the rhetoric (bodies in motion, etc), which, fine, itโs a bad name, whatever. And I was late to the trend so maybe I missed some bad thinkpieces. But those films deserved serious defenses and they got them
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And btw whether or not the people defending those films explicitly identified with VA is irrelevant imo- it was always (and still is) useful to me specifically as a descriptor of a trend, not as any kind of radical update of auteurism
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Posting this here where nobody will see it but I think itโs crazy that people still act like vulgar auteurism was this embarrassing aberration when a lot of its battles have actually already been won. No young cinephile would balk at anyone expressing love for Miami Vice, showgirls, or speed racer
10.10.2025 20:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Girlfriend of the year lol
22.01.2025 03:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Musician I like lol
22.01.2025 03:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maybe this will be my only Bluesky post
10.12.2024 22:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I looooove gfoty
10.12.2024 22:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0