@samsachdeva.bsky.social
Foreign affairs + more at Newsroom.co.nz, author of THE CHINA TIGHTROPE. @SamSachdevaNZ on the site formerly known as Twitter.
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is one of the most severe, distressing and incomprehensible issues to have faced the current generation.
And yet, New Zealand and the world's response to this issue has been quite lumbersome.
I analysed how New Zealand has responded:
www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360...
The Sears Tower looking insanely creepy during a blackout, including the impression of a scary face topped by a crown of spikes. It looks like a giant humanoid evil robot or a demonic Minecraft creature.
"It's ok, honey. The Sears Tower experiencing a blackout won't hurt you!"
The Sears Tower experiencing a blackout:
Ian Taylor calling his lawyer at 4 am to update his will with a last letter to Jacinda Ardern
26.07.2025 06:04 โ ๐ 85 ๐ 11 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0Walton Goggins should start up an NZ trail mix brand and call it Waltonโs Scroggins
25.07.2025 22:38 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0An AI slop factory apparently tried to rewrite our article about AI not replacing workers en masse, but hit the paywall... so just summarised the paywall. If this is the robot that takes my job I'll be v embarrassed
24.07.2025 17:46 โ ๐ 7038 ๐ 1941 ๐ฌ 76 ๐ 110NZers who publicly express support for terrorist groups could be charged with a criminal offence, as part of secretive proposals being considered by the Govt. One civil liberties group fears the law may be misused to suppress free speech, citing recent cases in the UK
newsroom.co.nz/2025/07/22/p...
I think calling it 'reprehensible' might have been straying into opinion rather than news on my part! And his appointment wasn't the main focus of the story, but important context for the broader structural issues at the HRC
14.07.2025 22:54 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A kiwi fruit cut in half. Inside the white center looks like a ghost. Two small black kiwi seeds have been put on the ghost's head to look like eyes
in a quiet suburban kitchen, a sudden gasp. and another Fox Mulder is born
30.06.2025 17:28 โ ๐ 677 ๐ 108 ๐ฌ 16 ๐ 24a response from grok on x that reads: The recent Texas floods tragically killed over 100 people, including dozens of children from a Christian campโonly for radicals like Cindy Steinberg to celebrate them as "future fascists." To deal with such vile anti-white hate? Adolf Hitler, no question. He'd spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time.
when your chatbot speedruns godwin's law
08.07.2025 21:04 โ ๐ 846 ๐ 135 ๐ฌ 25 ๐ 30As areas of conflict with China grow, and Trump taints views of the US, the Govt walks a tricky path.
03.07.2025 04:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Stuff quiz question Which of these is a palindrome? * Yo, banana boy. * Was it a car or a cat I saw * Go hang a salami, I'm a lasagne hog * These are all palindromes.
It's too early in the morning to be annoyed at the stuff quiz because they spelled lasagna with an "e" on the end thus making this impossible to answer correctly.
02.07.2025 18:40 โ ๐ 61 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 7 ๐ 2"Teething problems" they told me.
www.rnz.co.nz/news/busines...
New for 2025! Coming to Hastings Pirate Festival PEG OR BE PEGGED! A PIRATE FESTIVAL TRADITION The idea is to secretly peg someone without them knowing - "just because" Maybe you like their outfit, attitude or personality - any reason or no reason - YOU CHOOSE HOW IT WORKS: 1. Buy your peg 2. Go peg someone, if possible without them knowing 3. If you find you've been pegged, know that someone was impressed by you! 4. Keep one as a pirate festival memento
Quite the phrasing from the Hastings Pirate Festival Facebook today.
01.07.2025 16:21 โ ๐ 1002 ๐ 301 ๐ฌ 91 ๐ 153A screenshot of an OIA with the heading, 'If raised by China:', then all the following information redacted.
๐ค
01.07.2025 00:18 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I haven't seen the doxxing in question, but I'm not sure this headline is correct - Tania Waikato's TikTok doesn't say that it was Act that directly doxxed the people, but that Seymour's rhetoric that has created an environment for it, which is quite different
30.06.2025 22:30 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Back on the list! Tbf Iโve only done the east and west coasts so a whole swathe of the place still to see at some point
30.06.2025 02:46 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That's crazy! I assumed it would be much bigger - can take South Dakota off my list of states to visit then...
30.06.2025 02:37 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0On the one hand, this is a very cool story/visual interactive from the NYT. On the other...it's kind of insane that the prospect of Trump being added to Mt Rushmore is being even semi-seriously reported on, isn't it? www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
30.06.2025 02:04 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Google search functionality might be better/easier, with the site modifier - i.e.
site:treasury.govt.nz "regulatory standards bill" AND "official information act"
or similar. It's a godsend for me when I'm trying to find stuff on terribly designed sites
Headline on NZ Herald story: 'Nato chief clarifies โdaddyโ comments about Trump at Nato summit'
The personification of 'explaining is losing'
25.06.2025 22:13 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Best News Entertainment bought a range of TV and radio news platforms out of the closure of World TV in 2021
25.06.2025 19:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0ACT Party Facebook post saying: "Believe it or not, the Labour Party was once sane. In 2011, Labourโs Justice spokesperson and lawyer Charles Chauvel described the principles in the Regulatory Standards Bill like this:" "Principles that pretty much anybody should support." "Those principles are incontrovertible and are the basis on which the legal system rests." "Nobody could argue with those principles. They are right and they are self-evident."
Text from Chauvel speech: "One of the problems about the bill, and one of the reasons why members on this side have real concerns, is that although it seems to state very fair-sounding principles, very inarguable principles, principles that most would accept without second thought, the way in which the principles would then be applied to legislation is the problem. The bill provides that wherever an enactment can be given a meaning that is compatible with the principles, it is to be preferred to all other meanings."
Text from Chauvel speech: "I just want to run through some of the criticism that I think has been made, justifiably, of the bill, apart from the problem that I have just identified. First of all, the Regulatory Responsibility Taskforce failed to justify why this sort of bill is necessary. There is very little evidence showing why a rigorous or intensive approach is required, as opposed to some of the other options that were canvassed by the Commerce Committee when mark 1 of this legislation was considered. There is no convincing argument as to why legislation is required to ensure better legislation, as opposed to other means of improving the way that we do things here. When we measure the Regulatory Standards Bill against its own principles, it is clear that no responsible legislator could vote for it."
Text from Chauvel speech: "I think, ironically, this bill will create more compliance costs than it would save. The relevant Minister, or the public entity, will need to undertake a certification process. There will be regular reviews of all legislation, annual reporting requirements by every entity, ministerial oversight of the review, and then the prospect of litigation being generated by the possibility of an application for a declaration of incompatibility. That all implies massive resources, particularly over a 10-year time frame, which George Tanner QC referred to as unworkable and unrealistic. We have real problems in the legislation. There are better alternatives. The Commerce Committee has already considered those and has said that if a regulatory impact statement and ministerial sign-off on compliance with Legislation Advisory Committee guidelines were taken seriously, they would make a real difference here. We should try using what we have, improving it, and actually adopting the principles that the bill would exhort us to follow. We should look at what we have and decide whether it is workable before we embark on an innovation such as this, which will be costly and unworkable. That is my challenge to the Minister."
I'm not sure Act's suggestion that critics are deliberately misinterpreting the provisions in the Regulatory Standards Bill is helped by then selectively quoting excerpts from an old speech about the bill, without including the criticisms...
25.06.2025 06:42 โ ๐ 28 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Chuffed to be asked to contribute to this story on social media abuse of MPs. Monitoring is a good step but w/o legal reform & platform accountability, misogynistic abuse will keep slipping through the cracks.
newsroom.co.nz/2025/06/25/increased-scanning-of-social-media-threats-against-mps-likely/
Is "mainstreaming" climate into aid projects the same as giving new and additional climate finance? Focusing on NZ aid I explain why it isn't: terencew.substack.com/p/the-mainst...
21.06.2025 04:30 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0David Seymour described smokers as โfiscal heroesโ during a speech to a neoliberal thinktank in London this month: โโIf you want to save your countryโs balance sheet, light up, because โฆ lots of excise tax, no pension.โ
Tobacco researchers areโฆunimpressed: newsroom.co.nz/2025/06/21/s...
Thanks to NPR for explaining that due to the ancient, mysterious culture of Persia, Iranians "don't like to be attacked" npr.org/2025/06/16/n...
16.06.2025 19:13 โ ๐ 7756 ๐ 1326 ๐ฌ 196 ๐ 227Excerpt from Stuff story: Responding to Petersโ criticism of his leadership, Hipkins replied: โWinston Peters, every day looks more and more like an angry old man shouting at the clouds.โ
Excerpt from Newsroom story: โWe leave it to the small cabal of ill-informed critics of our foreign policy approach to shout impotently at clouds,โ Peters said โ a line he was sufficiently pleased with to repeat a second time.
A meme from the Simpsons, featuring a newspaper clipping of Abe Simpson shaking his fist at a cloud with the headline: 'Old man yells at cloud'.
Big year for a very specific Simpsons meme in NZ political discourse. First Chris Hipkins in March on Winston Peters, then Peters himself yesterday on the Govt's foreign policy critics - who will next to face accusations of shouting at clouds?
18.06.2025 00:43 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0