David Lea Wrath's Avatar

David Lea Wrath

@davidleawrath.bsky.social

Lapsed Liverpolitan, Lifetime Liverpudlian, Low-key Londoner, Lugubrious Layabout, Lachrymose Lummox. Forest Hillbilly. Hispanophile. Cricket scorer. Fond of a crisp.

163 Followers  |  259 Following  |  204 Posts  |  Joined: 27.11.2023  |  1.8791

Latest posts by davidleawrath.bsky.social on Bluesky

It’s Wayne Hennessy I feel sorry for. If only he’d tried this excuse he’d have been fine.

20.01.2025 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A mate of mine did a survey of charity shops a few years after that and it was neck and neck between White Ladder and Sing When You’re Winning.

17.01.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh my Shrubsole and my Brunt long ago

17.01.2025 02:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh my Shrubsole and my Brunt long ago #womensashes

17.01.2025 02:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s when Australians start saying rancid old toot like β€˜people will feel themselves privileged to have watched us’ that the game will truly have gone.

08.01.2025 20:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I see Piers Morgan is leaving News UK. He’ll leave an enormous, gaping hole.

08.01.2025 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 101    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 2

β€œBecause it’s 2015”. I had the same thought earlier.

06.01.2025 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe it’s alphabetical, and tomorrow lots of people whose names start with Li will get Amanda, Amandine and Ammaaandaaaaaa

06.01.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ve had the same today.

06.01.2025 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Shop sign reading PABLO TOBACCO

Shop sign reading PABLO TOBACCO

β€œSome people try to pick up girls,
And get called an asshole,
This never happened to -

02.01.2025 11:18 β€” πŸ‘ 644    πŸ” 106    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 2

WOOF

31.12.2024 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I sympathise. It wasn’t a serious point anyway.

30.12.2024 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not because it was unrealistic πŸ˜†

30.12.2024 20:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ironically, that business park was where I worked at the time of both filming and broadcast. Have since left.

30.12.2024 20:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well they were on a word count. Or something.

30.12.2024 20:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

At working out crimes and who done’em. Once he is cut an unfeasible amount of slack for not being able to do the other bits.

30.12.2024 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Of course not. Never claimed otherwise.

30.12.2024 20:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But didn’t know what many basic terms of art in police work meant.

30.12.2024 20:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

* into him being suddenly incapable of doing his job.

30.12.2024 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

* not working out the man was suddenly incapable of doing his job

30.12.2024 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Again, that’s a valid opinion to hold. β€˜The <unlikely profession> who catches criminals’ is a trope as old as TV and has been mocked many times (Fast Show, etc). But it’s also valid to have a line, and the Guardian reviewer thought it crossed his.

30.12.2024 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And the Thargons thing was a self-deprecating joke. Come on.

30.12.2024 20:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s a mischaracterisation because you say I think they should have noticed he was his twin brother. Who they knew nothing about. I don’t. Never have. They *would* have noticed he was strangely incapable of doing his job and done something about it.

30.12.2024 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Very well, I wrote my dissertation on TlΓΆn, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius. I have emphatically not denied myself speculative fiction. I’m just not that into how that enormous and variable genre has manifested in TV and cinema in the last few decades. And I think it has impacted viewers’ assessments.

30.12.2024 20:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Another mischaracterisation. I’ve had enough.

30.12.2024 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s not unthinking. It’s just different from yours and unpalatable to you. Which I can accept. Social media cuts out the hinterland.
Now, I suggest this is left here before the Thargons from the planet Tharg discover it in the year 3765 πŸ˜†

30.12.2024 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m not sure how you can pronounce with such confidence that I’m some sort of unthinking (a word you’ve used a couple of times) ignoramus who has consumed no fiction of this sort ever.

30.12.2024 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A bit. But not much.

30.12.2024 19:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And @ mentioned in the post.

30.12.2024 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Well you came in and described (a mischaracterisation of) my view as β€˜horseshit’ so it wasn’t going that well from the off, to be fair.

30.12.2024 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@davidleawrath is following 19 prominent accounts